• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估远程医疗对糖尿病患者血糖管理的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Assessing the impact of telehealth on blood glucose management among patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Getie Addisu, Amlak Baye Tsegaye, Ayenew Temesgen, Gedfew Mihretie

机构信息

Department of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12401-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12401-9
PMID:39979923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11840977/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellites (DM), especially type 2 diabetes mellitus, presents significant challenges for healthcare systems. Effective blood glucose management is essential for preventing serious complications, and telehealth offers a promising approach to improve patient engagement and adherence. The effectiveness of telehealth on blood glucose management should be investigated. The evaluated metric for diabetes management plans in this study was the change in blood glucose levels, specifically HbA1c, as an indicator of glycemic control. The impact of telehealth interventions on these outcomes was analyzed across various patient groups. This review conducts a comprehensive analysis of the current literature to offer insights that can guide clinical practices and inform policymakers about the advantages of telehealth in managing diabetes.

METHODS

In this study, several evidence-based databases and relevant clinical trial registries were searched to evaluate the effects of telehealth on blood glucose management among patients with diabetes. The included studies were randomized controlled trials that compared telehealth with traditional in-person management. Microsoft Excel was used to extract and sort the data before it was exported to STATA/MP 17.0 for analysis. A weighted inverse variance random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval was employed to pool the data. Egger's test and Cochrane I statistics were used to assess publication bias and heterogeneity, respectively.

RESULT

This review identified six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 3,995 patients, with 2,022 in the telehealth intervention group and 1,973 in the control group, conducted across the USA, Asia, and Europe. The analysis showed a significant improvement in blood glucose control for patients using telehealth, evidenced by a Standard Mean Difference (SMD) of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.10-0.29; p < 0.001), with USA studies reflecting the highest SMD of 0.24 and diabetic veterans showing an even greater SMD of 0.41.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This study demonstrates that telehealth interventions significantly enhance blood glucose management among patients with diabetes. The findings highlight the need for healthcare systems to prioritize telehealth integration into diabetes management protocols while developing tailored interventions to meet the diverse needs of various patient populations.

摘要

引言

糖尿病,尤其是2型糖尿病的患病率不断上升,给医疗系统带来了重大挑战。有效的血糖管理对于预防严重并发症至关重要,而远程医疗为提高患者参与度和依从性提供了一种很有前景的方法。应研究远程医疗在血糖管理方面的有效性。本研究中糖尿病管理计划的评估指标是血糖水平的变化,特别是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),作为血糖控制的指标。在不同患者群体中分析了远程医疗干预对这些结果的影响。本综述对当前文献进行了全面分析,以提供可指导临床实践的见解,并让政策制定者了解远程医疗在糖尿病管理中的优势。

方法

在本研究中,检索了几个循证数据库和相关临床试验注册库,以评估远程医疗对糖尿病患者血糖管理的影响。纳入的研究是将远程医疗与传统面对面管理进行比较的随机对照试验。在将数据导出到STATA/MP 17.0进行分析之前,使用Microsoft Excel提取和整理数据。采用具有95%置信区间的加权逆方差随机效应模型汇总数据。分别使用Egger检验和Cochrane I统计量评估发表偏倚和异质性。

结果

本综述确定了六项随机对照试验(RCT),共涉及3995名患者,其中远程医疗干预组2022名,对照组1973名,试验在美国、亚洲和欧洲开展。分析表明,使用远程医疗的患者血糖控制有显著改善,标准化均数差(SMD)为0.20(95%CI:0.10 - 0.29;p < 0.001),美国的研究显示最高SMD为0.24,糖尿病退伍军人的SMD更高,为0.41。

结论与建议

本研究表明,远程医疗干预可显著改善糖尿病患者的血糖管理。研究结果强调,医疗系统在制定满足不同患者群体多样化需求的定制干预措施时,需要将远程医疗纳入糖尿病管理方案的优先事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/bcd6932aa3dd/12913_2025_12401_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/fead02042753/12913_2025_12401_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/eaf2b8b5df73/12913_2025_12401_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/6969121daee8/12913_2025_12401_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/e714a3ccabe9/12913_2025_12401_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/d06d765f537a/12913_2025_12401_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/bcd6932aa3dd/12913_2025_12401_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/fead02042753/12913_2025_12401_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/eaf2b8b5df73/12913_2025_12401_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/6969121daee8/12913_2025_12401_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/e714a3ccabe9/12913_2025_12401_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/d06d765f537a/12913_2025_12401_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8914/11840977/bcd6932aa3dd/12913_2025_12401_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of telehealth on blood glucose management among patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.评估远程医疗对糖尿病患者血糖管理的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 20;25(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12401-9.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Telemedicine in Improving Glycemic Control Among Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远程医疗在改善 1 型糖尿病患儿血糖控制中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 9;26:e51538. doi: 10.2196/51538.
4
Effect of Multimodal App-Based Interventions on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于应用程序的多模式干预对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 24;27:e54324. doi: 10.2196/54324.
5
The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.远程医疗远程患者监测对2型糖尿病血糖控制的影响:随机对照试验系统评价的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3274-8.
6
Effect of probiotics at different intervention time on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同干预时间的益生菌对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 24;15:1392306. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1392306. eCollection 2024.
7
Effectiveness of shared decision-making for glycaemic control among type 2 diabetes mellitus adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.共享决策对 2 型糖尿病成年患者血糖控制效果的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306296. eCollection 2024.
8
The Impact of Resistance Exercise Training on Glycemic Control Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.抗阻运动训练对 2 型糖尿病成人血糖控制的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Biol Res Nurs. 2024 Oct;26(4):597-623. doi: 10.1177/10998004241246272. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre-existing diabetes.孕前患有糖尿病的女性孕期血糖监测技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 11;6(6):CD009613. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009613.pub3.
10
Effectiveness of remote monitoring for glycemic control on maternal-fetal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis.远程监测对妊娠期糖尿病母婴结局血糖控制效果的Meta 分析。
Birth. 2024 Mar;51(1):13-27. doi: 10.1111/birt.12769. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Adherence for Oral Combination Therapies in Diabetes Management: A Scoping Review.糖尿病管理中口服联合疗法的患者依从性:一项范围综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;8(5):e70780. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70780. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of telemedicine intervention in the self-management of patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.远程医疗干预对 2 型糖尿病患者自我管理效果的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 21;12:1405770. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1405770. eCollection 2024.
2
Effectiveness of a comprehensive telemedicine intervention replacing standard care in gestational diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.综合远程医疗干预替代妊娠期糖尿病标准护理的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Aug;60(8):1037-1044. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02099-8. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials.
JBI 偏倚风险评估工具修订版用于评估随机对照试验的偏倚风险。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):494-506. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00430.
4
A randomized trial of comparing video telecare education vs. in-person education on dietary regimen compliance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a support for clinical telehealth Providers.一项比较视频远程医疗教育与面对面教育对 2 型糖尿病患者饮食方案依从性影响的随机试验:为临床远程医疗服务提供者提供支持。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2022 May 2;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01032-4.
5
Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine care for patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间对2型糖尿病控制不佳患者进行远程医疗护理的成本效益
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2021 Sep 8;12:20406223211042542. doi: 10.1177/20406223211042542. eCollection 2021.
6
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明的扩展。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 26;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
7
Trends in the Use of Telehealth During the Emergence of the COVID-19 Pandemic - United States, January-March 2020.COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗使用趋势 - 美国,2020 年 1 月至 3 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595-1599. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3.
8
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.修订后的 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)显示出较低的评分者间可靠性和应用方面的挑战。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.Meta 分析中固定效应模型和随机效应模型的基本介绍。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):97-111. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.12. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.