• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经合组织(OECD)国家和金砖国家(BRICS)中新冠疫情前后国家卫生政策、战略和计划的比较内容分析

Comparative content analysis of national health policies, strategies and plans before and after COVID-19 among OECD and BRICS countries.

作者信息

Song Jialu, Zhu Ziqi, Li Qi, Chen Ying, Wang Zhebin, Zhou Shuduo, Xu Ming, Zheng Zhi-Jie

机构信息

Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 10034, China.

Peking University School of Public Health, 38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.

出版信息

Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Feb 21;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00400-y.

DOI:10.1186/s41256-024-00400-y
PMID:39985012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11843992/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed significant limitations in health systems worldwide and emphasized the need for updated National Health Policies, Strategies, and Plans (NHPSPs). This study aimed to evaluate the NHPSPs of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, it explored each country's commitment to strengthening health systems to address health threats and analyzed the specific changes made.

METHODS

NHPSP documents from the WHO document repository and official governmental websites were systematically searched. Data were extracted using a standardized template. A coding framework was inductively developed to sort qualitative texts into categories, with frequencies calculated and weighting evaluated, followed by organizing underlying content into subthemes.

RESULTS

Out of 154 documents initially identified, 36 met the screening criteria, covering 14 OECD and 3 BRICS countries. The most predominant theme was prevention (88.9% pre-pandemic, 99.4% post-pandemic), which was addressed as a primary theme in 26 included NHPSPs. After the COVID-19 pandemic, 6 out of 14 analyzed themes saw higher occurrences, among which infection prevention and control (22.2-50.0%) and resilience to health crisis (22.2-44.4%) increased most significantly. Themes mainstreamed in post-pandemic NHPSPs included prevention (94.4%), health research and technology (61.1%), and One Health (66.7%). Primary healthcare emerged as the most concerned subtheme under prevention. Notably, OECD countries displayed more increased occurrences of themes (13 out of 14) or increased emphasis on themes with similar occurrences before and after COVID-19, while BRICS countries only differed in infection control. Additionally, OECD and BRICS countries varied in their subthemes and specific actions under similar primary themes.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 exposed vulnerabilities in many countries' health systems, highlighting the need to build resilient health infrastructures through the optimization of NHPSPs. However, only about half of the OECD and BRICS countries have implemented new NHPSPs since the pandemic. Our findings highlight the critical need for global health system reforms and offer actionable recommendations for other countries in formulating their NHPSPs.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情暴露出全球卫生系统存在的重大局限性,并凸显了更新国家卫生政策、战略和计划(NHPSPs)的必要性。本研究旨在评估经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家以及金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)在新冠疫情前后的NHPSPs。具体而言,本研究探讨了各国在加强卫生系统以应对卫生威胁方面的承诺,并分析了所做出的具体变化。

方法

系统检索了世界卫生组织文件库和官方政府网站中的NHPSP文件。使用标准化模板提取数据。归纳制定了一个编码框架,将定性文本分类,计算频率并评估权重,然后将基础内容组织成子主题。

结果

在最初识别的154份文件中,36份符合筛选标准,涵盖14个经合组织国家和3个金砖国家。最主要的主题是预防(疫情前为88.9%,疫情后为99.4%),在纳入的26份NHPSP文件中被视为主要主题。新冠疫情后,在分析的14个主题中,有6个主题出现频率更高,其中感染预防与控制(从22.2%增至50.0%)和卫生危机应对能力(从22.2%增至44.4%)增幅最为显著。疫情后NHPSP文件中主流化的主题包括预防(94.4%)、卫生研究与技术(61.1%)以及“同一健康”理念(66.7%)。初级卫生保健成为预防主题下最受关注的子主题。值得注意的是,经合组织国家在新冠疫情前后,更多主题出现频率增加(14个主题中有13个)或对出现频率相似的主题的重视程度增加,而金砖国家仅在感染控制方面有所不同。此外,经合组织国家和金砖国家在相似的主要主题下的子主题和具体行动也存在差异。

结论

新冠疫情暴露了许多国家卫生系统的脆弱性,凸显了通过优化NHPSP来构建有韧性的卫生基础设施的必要性。然而,自疫情以来,经合组织国家和金砖国家中只有约一半实施了新的NHPSP。我们的研究结果凸显了全球卫生系统改革的迫切需求,并为其他国家制定NHPSP提供了可操作的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d212/11843992/5b00503cfb2a/41256_2024_400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d212/11843992/d4a99e2f4faa/41256_2024_400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d212/11843992/5b00503cfb2a/41256_2024_400_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d212/11843992/d4a99e2f4faa/41256_2024_400_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d212/11843992/5b00503cfb2a/41256_2024_400_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative content analysis of national health policies, strategies and plans before and after COVID-19 among OECD and BRICS countries.经合组织(OECD)国家和金砖国家(BRICS)中新冠疫情前后国家卫生政策、战略和计划的比较内容分析
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Feb 21;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00400-y.
2
Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries.金砖国家应对 COVID-19 的核心政策差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 20;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z.
3
COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS countries and its association with socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response.金砖国家的 COVID-19 大流行及其与社会经济和人口特征、健康脆弱性、资源和政策应对的关联。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 8;10(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00881-w.
4
Time trends in thermal burns incidence among Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS), an age-period-cohort analysis from the GBD 2019.巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)热烧伤发病率的时间趋势,一项基于全球疾病负担研究(GBD)2019的年龄-时期-队列分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90935-y.
5
Future health spending forecast in leading emerging BRICS markets in 2030: health policy implications.2030 年金砖五国主要新兴市场的未来卫生支出预测:对卫生政策的影响。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 19;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00822-5.
6
'BRICS without straw'? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies' influence in global health.“金砖无足轻重”?对新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力的系统文献回顾。
Global Health. 2013 Apr 15;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-15.
7
Trends in mortality due to tracheal, bronchial, and lung cancer across the BRICS: An age-period-cohort analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019.金砖国家气管、支气管和肺癌死亡率趋势:基于1990 - 2019年全球疾病负担研究的年龄-时期-队列分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Dec 5;137(23):2860-2867. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002977. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
8
Time trends in anxiety disorders incidence across the BRICS: an age-period-cohort analysis for the GBD 2021.BRICS 国家焦虑障碍发病率的时间趋势:基于 GBD 2021 的年龄-时期-队列分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 7;12:1467385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467385. eCollection 2024.
9
Secular trends in chronic respiratory diseases mortality in Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa: a comparative study across main BRICS countries from 1990 to 2019.巴西、俄罗斯、中国和南非慢性呼吸道疾病死亡率的长期趋势:1990 年至 2019 年主要金砖国家的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;22(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12484-z.
10
Time trends in the incidence of interstitial lung disease across Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) from 1990 to 2019: An age-period-cohort analysis.1990 年至 2019 年巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)间质性肺病发病率的时间趋势:一项年龄-时期-队列分析。
Respirology. 2024 Oct;29(10):888-896. doi: 10.1111/resp.14785. Epub 2024 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Surveillance strategies for SARS-CoV-2 infections through one health approach.通过“同一健康”方法对新冠病毒感染进行监测的策略。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(17):e37128. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37128. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
2
One Health policy for combatting African trypanocide resistance.抗击非洲锥虫病耐药性的一体化健康政策。
One Health. 2024 Aug 5;19:100871. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100871. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Reviewing essential public health functions in the Eastern Mediterranean Region post COVID-19 pandemic: a foundation for system resilience.
回顾 COVID-19 大流行后东地中海区域的基本公共卫生职能:增强系统弹性的基础。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Mar 28;9(3):e013782. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013782.
4
Post-COVID health policy responses to healthcare workforce capacities: A comparative analysis of health system resilience in six European countries.后 COVID-19 时期医疗政策对医疗劳动力能力的应对措施:六个欧洲国家卫生系统弹性的比较分析。
Health Policy. 2024 Jan;139:104962. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104962. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
After 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic, translating One Health into action is urgent.在新冠疫情爆发两年后,将“同一健康”理念付诸行动刻不容缓。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 4;401(10378):789-794. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01840-2. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
6
Context and priorities for health systems strengthening for pain and disability in low- and middle-income countries: a secondary qualitative study and content analysis of health policies.中低收入国家加强疼痛和残疾相关卫生系统的背景、优先事项:卫生政策的二次定性研究和内容分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):129-149. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac061.
7
COVID-19 Spurs Transplant Vaccination Policy.COVID-19 推动了移植疫苗接种政策。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Dec;21(12):3817-3818. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16055.
8
Evidence-based COVID-19 policy-making in schools.基于证据的学校 COVID-19 政策制定。
Nat Med. 2021 Dec;27(12):2078-2079. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01585-2.
9
Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries.应对 COVID-19 大流行的卫生系统韧性:28 个国家的经验教训。
Nat Med. 2021 Jun;27(6):964-980. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y. Epub 2021 May 17.
10
The Anticipated Future of Public Health Services Post COVID-19: Viewpoint.后 COVID-19 时代公共卫生服务的预期未来:观点。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 18;7(6):e26267. doi: 10.2196/26267.