Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Latest Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND

Survival and surgical benefits of neoadjuvant treatments (NAT) in resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) remains unclear. The role of NAT in providing additional benefits to reduce biological aggressiveness and recurrence is worth elucidating. We assessed the latest randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed including trials published from inception to February 2024 to evaluate survival, surgical, and short-term oncological benefits with RCTs for RPC, comparing NAT with upfront surgery.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with 982 patients were analyzed. RPC treated with NAT conferred better median disease-free survival (DFS) compared to upfront surgery (HR = 0.66, p = 0.01) with a significantly improved R0 resection (RR = 1.20, p = 0.04) and pN0 rate (RR = 1.68, p < 0.001). These benefits did not translate into overall survival benefits (HR = 0.81, p = 0.06). Postoperative major morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between treatment approaches. No significant difference was noted in resection rate (RR = 0.95, p = 0.21). However, a significantly lower surgical exploration rate was exhibited in the NAT group (RR = 0.84, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

NAT conferred better DFS with significantly improved R0 resection rate and pN0 rate compared with upfront surgery. Our findings highlight the potential benefits of NAT in enhancing survival, surgical, and short-term oncological outcomes without increasing postoperative risks.