Khairat Saif, Morelli Jennifer, Qin Qiyao, Wu Xiaoyu, Fakhreddin Randy, Edson Barbara S, Williams Mauri
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 May;91:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.02.024. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
Nursing shortages lead to longer emergency department (ED) wait times and incomplete documentation. US health systems are rapidly implementing virtual nursing, a new care delivery model, to improve care and alleviate nursing burden by providing nursing care and expertise via telehealth.
To evaluate the association of using virtual nursing for patients admitted via the ED with quality outcomes, namely, wait time, admission assessment duration, documentation completeness, and number of interruptions.
Non-randomized retrospective cohort study of adult patients over the age of 18 seen in the ED and subsequently admitted to one of six hospitals.
Patients who had in-person admission assessments median wait time was 525.5 min (IQR: 332.9-969.8), while the median wait time for patients using virtual nursing for admission assessments was 429.5 min (IQR: 292.6-954.5). In-person admissions had a median duration of 24.0 min (IQR: 15.0-36.0), while virtual nursing admissions median duration was 29.0 min (IQR: 18.0-42.0). The average number of uncompleted documentation fields for in-person admissions was 0.4 ± 1.5, while the average for virtual nursing admissions was 0.2 ± 0.5. Finally, the average number of interruptions during admission for in-person was 1.8 ± 1.5 interruptions, while virtual nursing admissions averaged 1.4 ± 1.3 interruptions.
Virtual nursing was associated with shorter wait times, more complete nursing documentation, and fewer interruptions during admission assessments for patients admitted via the ED.
Virtual nursing is a promising care delivery model that may lead to reduced nursing burnout and enhanced patient care coordination.
护理人员短缺导致急诊科(ED)等待时间延长和文件记录不完整。美国医疗系统正在迅速实施虚拟护理这一新型护理模式,通过远程医疗提供护理服务和专业知识,以改善护理质量并减轻护理负担。
评估对通过急诊科收治的患者使用虚拟护理与质量结果之间的关联,即等待时间、入院评估时长、文件记录完整性和中断次数。
对18岁以上在急诊科就诊并随后入住六家医院之一的成年患者进行非随机回顾性队列研究。
进行面对面入院评估的患者中位等待时间为525.5分钟(四分位间距:332.9 - 96�.8),而使用虚拟护理进行入院评估的患者中位等待时间为429.5分钟(四分位间距:292.6 - 954.5)。面对面入院评估的中位时长为24.0分钟(四分位间距:15.0 - 36.0),而虚拟护理入院评估的中位时长为29.0分钟(四分位间距:18.0 - 42.0)。面对面入院时未完成文件记录字段的平均数量为0.4 ± 1.5,而虚拟护理入院时的平均数量为0.2 ± 0.5。最后,面对面入院期间的平均中断次数为1.8 ± 1.5次,而虚拟护理入院的平均中断次数为1.4 ± 1.3次。
对于通过急诊科收治的患者,虚拟护理与更短的等待时间、更完整的护理文件记录以及入院评估期间更少的中断次数相关。
虚拟护理是一种有前景的护理模式,可能会减少护理人员的倦怠并加强患者护理协调。