Da Silva Carlos Eduardo Rosa, Santana Wilian Jesus, Almeida Gustavo, Verame Adriano, Doro Antonio Roberto, Barbosa Eduardo, Lima Leonardo, Dias Helton Magalhães, Zanetti Marcelo Callegari, Junior Aylton Figueira
GETAFIS - São Judas Tadeu University, São Paulo, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 7;16:1533785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533785. eCollection 2025.
Self-selection of aerobic training intensity is an approach that allows practitioners to develop autonomy (choice of pace), improve physical fitness, and contribute to better affective responses and training adherence. However, it is still unclear whether self-selection of training intensity in group settings is comparable to individual training conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of three aerobic training protocols on psychophysiological responses in physically inactive adult obese women.
The sample consisted of 90 women with a mean age of 48.3 ± 5.5 years and BMI of 31.2 ± 4.8 kg/m, who participated in three treadmill aerobic training protocols: 1- Control group (IPI) with individually prescribed intensity (64 to 76% of HRmax), 2- Small group (SGS) with self-selected intensity, and 3- Individual with self-selected intensity (ISS). Heart rate (HR), total session volume (VL), affective valence was determined by feeling scale (FS), enjoyment was determined by Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), intention to repeat the exercise session (INT), and Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale (BPNFS) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way ANOVA for HR and FS, and one-way ANOVA for VL, PACES, INT, and BPNFS with Tukey test and significance criteria ( < 0.05).
The results showed that HR and VL were similar ( > 0.05) between the protocols IPI, SGS and ISS, while FS, PACES, and INT were significantly higher in SGS and ISS than IPI protocols ( < 0.05). BPNFS also presented better results for the SGS and ISS protocols ( < 0.05).
These findings suggest that the intensity and training volume were similar among different protocols. Affective responses were more positive perceived in SGS and ISS protocols.
We conclude that intensity self-selection is a safe, effective, and comparable strategy to prescribed intensity at moderate levels, providing a more enjoyable experience that may contribute to greater adherence to aerobic training.
有氧训练强度的自我选择是一种能让练习者培养自主性(选择节奏)、提高身体素质,并有助于产生更好的情感反应和训练依从性的方法。然而,在团体环境中训练强度的自我选择是否与个体训练条件相当仍不清楚。本研究的目的是比较三种有氧训练方案对缺乏身体活动的成年肥胖女性心理生理反应的影响。
样本包括90名女性,平均年龄48.3±5.5岁,体重指数为31.2±4.8kg/m²,她们参与了三种跑步机有氧训练方案:1-对照组(IPI),采用个体规定强度(最大心率的64%至76%);2-小组组(SGS),采用自我选择强度;3-个体自我选择强度组(ISS)。测定心率(HR)、总训练量(VL),通过感觉量表(FS)确定情感效价,通过体育活动享受量表(PACES)确定享受程度,评估重复训练课的意愿(INT)以及基本心理需求满足量表(BPNFS)。使用双向方差分析对HR和FS进行统计分析,对VL、PACES、INT和BPNFS使用单向方差分析,并进行Tukey检验,显著性标准为(<0.05)。
结果表明,IPI、SGS和ISS方案之间的HR和VL相似(>0.05),而SGS和ISS方案中的FS、PACES和INT显著高于IPI方案(<0.05)。BPNFS在SGS和ISS方案中也呈现出更好的结果(<0.05)。
这些发现表明不同方案之间的强度和训练量相似。在SGS和ISS方案中,情感反应的感知更为积极。
我们得出结论,强度自我选择是一种安全、有效且与中等水平规定强度相当的策略,能提供更愉快的体验,这可能有助于提高有氧训练的依从性。