Zeng Jinshu, Pojskic Haris, Xu Jing, Xu Yuanhong, Xu Fei
School of Physical Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Sports Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1181646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181646. eCollection 2023.
Although previous research found that small-sided game (SSG) training was more enjoyable than high-intensity interval training (HIT) in various sports, no data were provided during longer training period in basketball. Furthermore, the comparison of internal loads between the two training approaches needs to be further examined. Thus, this study aimed to examine the acute physiological, perceived exertion and enjoyment responses during 4-week progressive basketball SSG or HIT programs.
Nineteen female collegiate basketball players were randomly assigned to two groups that performed either HIT ( = 10) or SSG ( = 9) 3 times per week for 4 continuous weeks. Average and percentage of maximal heart rate (HR and %HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and physical activity enjoyment (PACES) were determined during each training session.
There was a main group effect in PACES ( < 0.001; = 0.44, moderate), and SSG had higher PACES than HIT in each week ( < 0.05). There were no significant interactions or main group effects in HR, %HR or RPE, but a main time effect was found in HR ( = 0.004; = 0.16, minimum), %HR ( < 0.001; = 0.25, minimum), and RPE ( < 0.001; = 0.31, moderate), respectively. In the SSG group, although no significant differences were found in HR responses, %HR was below 90% in week 1 and week 2. Accompanied with changes in %HR, RPE in week 1 and week 2 was lower than that in week 3 and week 4 ( < 0.05).
Our findings suggest that SSG and HIT elicit similar acute HR response and RPE level, but SSG is perceived as more enjoyable and therefore it is more likely to increase exercise motivation and adherence comparing to HIT. Moreover, it seems that half-court, 2 vs. 2 SS Gtraining format with modified rules and lasting ≥ 7.5 min should be prescribed as an enjoyable training alternative to provide optimal cardiovascular stimuli (> 90% of HR) for female basketball players.
尽管先前的研究发现，在各类运动中，小范围比赛（SSG）训练比高强度间歇训练（HIT）更有趣，但在篮球运动较长训练期内却没有相关数据。此外，两种训练方法之间内部负荷的比较还需进一步研究。因此，本研究旨在探讨为期4周的渐进式篮球SSG或HIT训练计划期间的急性生理反应、主观用力感觉和愉悦感反应。
19名大学女子篮球运动员被随机分为两组，一组进行HIT训练（n = 10），另一组进行SSG训练（n = 9），每周训练3次，持续4周。在每次训练期间测定平均心率（HR）和最大心率百分比（%HR）、主观用力感觉等级（RPE）以及身体活动愉悦感（PACES）。
PACES存在主要的组间效应（P < 0.001；η² = 0.44，中等效应量），且在每周的训练中，SSG的PACES均高于HIT（P < 0.05）。在HR、%HR或RPE方面，不存在显著的交互作用或主要组间效应，但在HR方面发现了主要的时间效应（P = 0.004；η² = 0.16，小效应量），在%HR方面（P < 0.001；η² = 0.25，小效应量），以及在RPE方面（P < 0.001；η² = 0.31，中等效应量）。在SSG组中，尽管HR反应未发现显著差异，但在第1周和第2周，%HR低于90%。伴随着%HR的变化，第1周和第2周的RPE低于第3周和第4周（P < 0.05）。
我们的研究结果表明，SSG和HIT引起相似的急性HR反应和RPE水平，但SSG被认为更有趣，因此与HIT相比，它更有可能提高运动动机和依从性。此外，似乎半场、2对2的SSG训练形式，采用修改后的规则且持续时间≥7.5分钟，应作为一种有趣的训练选择，为女子篮球运动员提供最佳的心血管刺激（>90%HR）。
