• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

批判性思维与创造性思维之间关系的评估:互补的元认知过程还是奇怪的组合?

An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking: Complementary Metacognitive Processes or Strange Bedfellows?

作者信息

Dwyer Christopher P, Campbell Deaglán, Seery Niall

机构信息

Technology Education Research Group (TERG), Department of Technology Education, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, N37 HD68 Westmeath, Ireland.

出版信息

J Intell. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):23. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13020023.

DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13020023
PMID:39997174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11856445/
Abstract

Though both critical thinking and creative thinking are often cited and promoted as important cognitive processes in personal, academic and professional settings, common misconceptualisation of both often leads to confusion for non-experts; for example, with respect to lumping them together erroneously as much the same thing, completely confusing them for one another or, on the other hand, distinguishing them to such an extent that all genuine overlap is ignored. Given the importance of these processes in real-world scenarios, quality education and 'metaeducation' is necessary to ensure their appropriate translation to students and educators, alike. Thus, the aim of the current review is to discuss various perspectives on both critical and creative thinking with particular focus paid to addressing such common misconceptualisation. Detailed discussion is provided with respect to important ways in which they are distinct and overlap. Recommendations for what contexts application of each are appropriate are also provided. Furthermore, implications for such enhanced understanding are discussed, in light of both theory and research.

摘要

尽管批判性思维和创造性思维在个人、学术和专业领域中经常被提及并被视为重要的认知过程,但对这两者的常见误解常常使非专业人士感到困惑;例如,错误地将它们混为一谈,完全把它们彼此混淆,或者另一方面,将它们区分到忽略所有真正重叠之处的程度。鉴于这些过程在现实场景中的重要性,高质量的教育和“元教育”对于确保它们能被恰当地传授给学生和教育工作者而言是必要的。因此,本综述的目的是讨论关于批判性思维和创造性思维的各种观点,特别着重于解决此类常见的误解。文中详细讨论了它们不同和重叠的重要方式。还提供了关于每种思维在何种情境下适用的建议。此外,结合理论和研究探讨了这种深入理解所带来的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce6c/11856445/a3d5737a3c94/jintelligence-13-00023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce6c/11856445/1d6391fd183e/jintelligence-13-00023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce6c/11856445/a3d5737a3c94/jintelligence-13-00023-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce6c/11856445/1d6391fd183e/jintelligence-13-00023-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce6c/11856445/a3d5737a3c94/jintelligence-13-00023-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking: Complementary Metacognitive Processes or Strange Bedfellows?批判性思维与创造性思维之间关系的评估:互补的元认知过程还是奇怪的组合?
J Intell. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):23. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13020023.
2
The Role of Metacognitive Components in Creative Thinking.元认知成分在创造性思维中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 24;10:2404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02404. eCollection 2019.
3
Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self-regulated learning theory.在护理实践中促进认知和元认知反思推理技能:自我调节学习理论
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Feb;45(4):381-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.x.
4
A mixed method evaluation of an integrated course in improving critical thinking and creative self-efficacy among nursing students.一项混合方法评估,评估一门综合课程对提高护理学生批判性思维和创新自我效能的效果。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Nov;106:105067. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105067. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
5
Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education.高等教育中的元认知策略与批判性思维发展
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 15;13:913219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219. eCollection 2022.
6
Thinking about Kindergarten thinking: A mixed methods study.关于幼儿园思维的思考:一项混合方法研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:933541. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.933541. eCollection 2022.
7
An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings.对教育及现实世界环境中批判性思维障碍的评估性综述
J Intell. 2023 May 31;11(6):105. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060105.
8
The Role of Metacognitive Strategy Monitoring and Control in the Relationship between Creative Mindsets and Divergent Thinking Performance.元认知策略监控与控制在创造性思维定式和发散性思维表现之间关系中的作用。
J Intell. 2022 Jun 16;10(2):35. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10020035.
9
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
10
Exploring medical students' metacognitive and regulatory dimensions of diagnostic problem solving.探讨医学生在诊断问题解决中的元认知和调节维度。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2210804. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2210804.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensory Modality in Students Enrolled in a Specialized Training Program for Security Forces and Its Impact on Karate Performance Indicators.参加安全部队专业培训项目的学生的感觉模态及其对空手道表现指标的影响。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Mar 28;10(2):114. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020114.

本文引用的文献

1
An Evaluative Review of Barriers to Critical Thinking in Educational and Real-World Settings.对教育及现实世界环境中批判性思维障碍的评估性综述
J Intell. 2023 May 31;11(6):105. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11060105.
2
Negative and nonemotional interference with visual working memory in schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者视觉工作记忆的负性和非情绪性干扰。
Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 15;70(12):1159-68. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
3
The impact of anxiety-inducing distraction on cognitive performance: a combined brain imaging and personality investigation.
焦虑诱发分心对认知表现的影响:脑成像与人格联合研究。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 30;5(11):e14150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014150.
4
Sleep deprivation and interference by emotional distracters.睡眠剥夺和情绪干扰。
Sleep. 2010 Oct;33(10):1305-13. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.10.1305.
5
Naturalistic decision making.自然决策
Hum Factors. 2008 Jun;50(3):456-60. doi: 10.1518/001872008X288385.
6
Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: a limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative.做出选择会损害后续的自我控制能力:一种关于决策、自我调节和积极主动性的有限资源观点。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):883-98. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.883.
7
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
8
Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction.介导情绪分心引起认知干扰的脑系统。
J Neurosci. 2006 Feb 15;26(7):2072-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5042-05.2006.
9
Cognitive Continuum Theory in nursing decision-making.护理决策中的认知连续体理论。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Feb;49(4):397-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03303.x.
10
Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis.心理社会因素和学习技能因素能预测大学学业成果吗?一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):261-88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261.