Zhou Zhongrui, Kardas Khalid, Gue Ying Xuan, Najm Ali, Tirawi Anas, Goode Rachel, Frodsham Robert, Kavanagh Rory, Rao Archana, Dobson Rebecca, Wright David, Kahn Matthew
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK.
Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jan 28;12(2):50. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020050.
The management of heart failure (HF) has undergone a paradigm shift from conventional stepwise methods of initiation and the up-titration of HF therapy towards an early, more intensive initiation of pharmacotherapy to improve the prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients at the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (LHCH), with new diagnosis of HF, who were reviewed by the inpatient heart failure team (HFT), compared to patients that were not reviewed. A retrospective review of the electronic records of patients admitted with a new diagnosis of HF to the LHCH from May to December 2023 was performed. Admission drugs were similar, apart from betablockers, which were more frequent in the non-HFT group (58% vs. 24.2%; = 0.002). The length of inpatient stay was longer in the HFT group (median 5.5 days vs. 3 days; = 0.001) and more likely to be on all four pillars of HF medical therapy (96.8% vs. 0; < 0.001) within 30 days of discharge. The 30-day and 6-month mortality outcomes were not significantly different. Patients reviewed by the HFT were significantly more likely to receive the four pillars of HF therapy within 30 days of their diagnosis compared to their counterparts at the expense of a longer length of stay.
心力衰竭(HF)的管理已发生了范式转变,从传统的逐步启动和滴定HF治疗方法转向早期、更强化的药物治疗启动,以改善预后。本研究的目的是比较利物浦心脏与胸部医院(LHCH)新诊断为HF的患者,经住院心力衰竭团队(HFT)评估与未评估患者的结局。对2023年5月至12月在LHCH新诊断为HF的患者的电子记录进行了回顾性审查。除β受体阻滞剂外,两组入院时使用的药物相似,非HFT组β受体阻滞剂的使用频率更高(58%对24.2%;P = 0.002)。HFT组的住院时间更长(中位数5.5天对3天;P = 0.001),出院后30天内更有可能接受HF药物治疗的所有四个关键治疗(96.8%对0;P < 0.001)。30天和6个月的死亡率结果无显著差异。与未接受HFT评估的患者相比,接受HFT评估的患者在诊断后30天内接受HF治疗四个关键治疗的可能性显著更高,但住院时间更长。