Suppr超能文献

交通事故与微出行:基于警方报告对个人移动设备与自行车的比较

Traffic collisions and micromobility: A comparison between personal mobility devices and bicycles based on police reports.

作者信息

Guesneau Marianne, Cherta-Ballester Oscar, Agier Lydiane, Arnoux Pierre-Jean, Wei Wei, Vernet Céline, Honoré Valentin, Bailly Nicolas

机构信息

LBA UMRT24, Aix Marseille Université/Université Gustave Eiffel-IFSTTAR, Marseille, France; IN&MOTION S.A.S., Annecy, France.

IN&MOTION S.A.S., Annecy, France.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2024 Dec;91:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.012. Epub 2024 Sep 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The recent increase in the use of bicycles and personal mobility devices (PMDs), including mostly E-scooters, is associated with a rapid rise in injuries. Understanding the main crash scenarios leading to these injuries is essential to evaluate and improve preventive and protective measures, especially for PMDs, which are often equated with bicycles. The objective of this study is to identify and compare the most common two-party collision scenarios for bicycles and PMDs, and to identify factors affecting injury severity.

METHOD

Crashes involving at least one PMD or one bicycle and another road user were analyzed from the 2019-2022 French police-reported road crashes database. We investigated the rider, the other vehicle, the road, and the crash scenarios characteristics (pre-crash maneuvers, impact zone on vehicles) and their joint effect on injury severity (hospitalization or fatality: yes/no).

RESULTS

We included 16,302 bicycle crashes and 4,118 PMD crashes in the analysis. Most of these collisions (75%) were against a car. The most frequent and the most severe collision scenario was the side-on-head for both bicycles (51%) and PMDs (58%); 67% of both bicycles and PMDs were going straight before the collision. Main factors associated with increased injury severity included colliding with a greater size vehicle, age above 50, and riding on roads with a higher speed limit. Bicycles remained at a higher risk of severe injury than PMDs after accounting for adjustment factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Although collision scenarios appear similar for bicycles and PMDs, differences in other crash characteristics and injury severity suggest that these two modes of transportation should not be equated in crash investigations.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings emphasize the need to primarily investigate side-on-head collisions with a moving car for both PMDs and bicycles in order to develop, evaluate, and improve protective devices to reduce the risk of injuries.

摘要

引言

最近,自行车和个人移动设备(PMD)的使用量有所增加,其中主要是电动滑板车,这与受伤人数的迅速上升有关。了解导致这些伤害的主要碰撞场景对于评估和改进预防及保护措施至关重要,尤其是对于通常被等同于自行车的PMD。本研究的目的是识别和比较自行车和PMD最常见的双方碰撞场景,并确定影响伤害严重程度的因素。

方法

从2019 - 2022年法国警方报告的道路交通事故数据库中分析涉及至少一辆PMD或一辆自行车与另一名道路使用者的事故。我们调查了骑车人、其他车辆、道路以及碰撞场景特征(碰撞前的操作、车辆上的撞击区域)及其对伤害严重程度(住院或死亡:是/否)的联合影响。

结果

我们在分析中纳入了16302起自行车事故和4118起PMD事故。这些碰撞中的大多数(75%)是与汽车相撞。最频繁且最严重的碰撞场景是自行车(51%)和PMD(58%)的侧面头部碰撞;自行车和PMD在碰撞前直行的比例均为67%。与伤害严重程度增加相关的主要因素包括与更大尺寸的车辆相撞、年龄超过50岁以及在限速较高的道路上骑行。在考虑调整因素后,自行车遭受重伤的风险仍然高于PMD。

结论

尽管自行车和PMD的碰撞场景看起来相似,但其他碰撞特征和伤害严重程度的差异表明,在事故调查中不应将这两种交通方式等同看待。

实际意义

这些发现强调,有必要主要调查PMD和自行车与行驶中的汽车的侧面头部碰撞,以便开发、评估和改进保护装置,以降低受伤风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验