Crowl Logan, Dutta Sujan, KhudaBukhsh Ashiqur R, Severnini Edson, Nagin Daniel S
Heinz College of Information Systems and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Mar 4;122(9):e2418821122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418821122. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
High-profile incidents of police violence against Black citizens over the past decade have spawned contentious debates in the United States on the role of police. This debate has played out prominently in the news media, leading to a perception that media outlets have become more critical of the police. There is currently, however, little empirical evidence supporting this perceived shift. We construct a large dataset of local news reporting on the police from 2013 to 2023 in 10 politically diverse U.S. cities. Leveraging advanced language models, we measure criticism by analyzing whether reporting supports or is critical of two contentions: 1) that the police protect citizens and 2) that the police are racist. To validate this approach, we collect labels from members of different political parties. We find that contrary to public perceptions, local media criticism of the police has remained relatively stable along these two dimensions over the past decade. While criticism spiked in the aftermath of high-profile police killings, such as George Floyd's murder, these events did not produce sustained increases in negative police news. In fact, reporting supportive of police effectiveness has increased slightly since Floyd's death. We find only small differences in coverage trends in more conservative and more liberal cities, undermining the idea that local outlets cater to the politics of their audiences. Last, although Republicans are more likely to view a piece of news as supportive of the police than Democrats, readers across parties see reporting as no more critical than it was a decade ago.
在过去十年中,警察对黑人公民实施暴力的备受瞩目的事件在美国引发了关于警察角色的激烈辩论。这场辩论在新闻媒体上显著展开,导致一种看法,即媒体机构对警察变得更加批评。然而,目前几乎没有实证证据支持这种感知到的转变。我们构建了一个关于2013年至2023年美国10个政治多元化城市的警察的地方新闻报道的大型数据集。利用先进的语言模型,我们通过分析报道是否支持或批评两个论点来衡量批评程度:1)警察保护公民;2)警察是种族主义者。为了验证这种方法,我们从不同政党的成员那里收集标签。我们发现,与公众认知相反,在过去十年中,地方媒体对警察的批评在这两个维度上一直相对稳定。虽然在诸如乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀等备受瞩目的警察杀人事件之后批评激增,但这些事件并没有导致负面警察新闻的持续增加。事实上,自弗洛伊德去世以来,支持警察效能的报道略有增加。我们发现在较为保守和较为自由的城市中,报道趋势只有很小的差异,这削弱了地方媒体迎合其受众政治立场的观点。最后,尽管共和党人比民主党人更有可能将一则新闻视为支持警察,但各党派的读者都认为报道并不比十年前更具批判性。