• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育技术在全纳小学教育中的应用:系统评价方案

Use of Educational Technology in Inclusive Primary Education: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

作者信息

Ranzato Erica, Holloway Catherine, Bandukda Maryam

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 25;14:e65045. doi: 10.2196/65045.

DOI:10.2196/65045
PMID:39999433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11897662/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Educational technology (EdTech) has been instrumental in the last few decades in promoting inclusive education by overcoming various learning barriers and offering tools and opportunities to all students, including those with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). However, there is limited understanding of current classroom practices and policies and of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on EdTech use in the inclusive classroom.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to outline the current knowledge on the use of EdTech to support the learning of students with SEND in inclusive primary schools in high-income countries.

METHODS

We followed the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) and the Generalized Systematic Review Registration Form in reporting the details of this protocol. The inclusion criteria for the systematic review require that studies focus on students with SEND who are attending the primary stage of school in high-income countries. The studies can be qualitative or quantitative and should explore the design and use of EdTech with these students. Eligible studies must be published between 2016 and 2024, be peer-reviewed, and be available in English. We systematically searched the ACM, Directory of Open Access Journals, British Educational Index, ERIC, Google Scholar (first 100 records), IEEE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The titles and abstracts of all records will be screened for relevance according to the inclusion criteria. Following this, the full text of the articles will be screened. To ensure the reliability of the screening process, an independent reviewer will screen a percentage of the records for the first screening round. The data extraction process for this systematic review will start with a pilot stage to validate and eventually update the list of entities to be extracted. Following the pilot stage, the final data extraction will be undertaken. An independent reviewer will extract data from a subsample of the records to ensure the reliability of the data extraction process.

RESULTS

The database search was conducted in July 2024. The database search identified a total of 547 records. It is anticipated that the study findings will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal by the end of January 2025.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will provide up-to-date evidence of the use of EdTech in inclusive primary school settings in high-income countries and will describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use of EdTech with students with SEND.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/65045.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年里,教育技术(EdTech)通过克服各种学习障碍并为所有学生,包括有特殊教育需求和残疾的学生(SEND)提供工具和机会,在促进全纳教育方面发挥了重要作用。然而,对于当前的课堂实践和政策以及新冠疫情对全纳课堂中教育技术使用的影响,人们的了解有限。

目的

本系统评价旨在概述关于在高收入国家的全纳小学中使用教育技术支持有特殊教育需求和残疾学生学习的现有知识。

方法

我们按照系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)以及广义系统评价注册表格来报告本方案的详细信息。系统评价的纳入标准要求研究聚焦于在高收入国家小学阶段就读的有特殊教育需求和残疾的学生。这些研究可以是定性的或定量的,并且应探索与这些学生相关的教育技术的设计和使用。符合条件的研究必须在2016年至2024年之间发表,经过同行评审,并且以英文提供。我们系统地检索了美国计算机协会(ACM)、开放获取期刊目录、英国教育索引、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、谷歌学术(前100条记录)、电气和电子工程师协会(IEEE)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO)、Scopus以及科学引文索引数据库(Web of Science)。将根据纳入标准筛选所有记录的标题和摘要以确定其相关性。在此之后,将对文章全文进行筛选。为确保筛选过程的可靠性,一名独立评审员将在第一轮筛选中对一定比例的记录进行筛选。本系统评价的数据提取过程将从试点阶段开始,以验证并最终更新要提取的实体列表。试点阶段之后,将进行最终的数据提取。一名独立评审员将从记录的子样本中提取数据,以确保数据提取过程的可靠性。

结果

数据库检索于2024年7月进行。数据库检索共识别出547条记录。预计研究结果将于2025年1月底提交至同行评审期刊发表。

结论

本研究将提供高收入国家全纳小学环境中教育技术使用的最新证据,并将描述新冠疫情对有特殊教育需求和残疾学生使用教育技术的影响。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/65045

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548e/11897662/6b9821174b44/resprot_v14i1e65045_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548e/11897662/6b9821174b44/resprot_v14i1e65045_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/548e/11897662/6b9821174b44/resprot_v14i1e65045_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Educational Technology in Inclusive Primary Education: Protocol for a Systematic Review.教育技术在全纳小学教育中的应用:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 25;14:e65045. doi: 10.2196/65045.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
5
School closures and reopenings during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review protocol.COVID-19 大流行期间学校关闭和重新开放:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):e054292. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054292.
6
Utilizing educational technology in enhancing undergraduate nursing students' engagement and motivation: A scoping review.利用教育技术提高本科护生的参与度和积极性:范围综述。
J Prof Nurs. 2022 Sep-Oct;42:262-275. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Effectiveness of interventions for improving educational outcomes for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.中低收入国家改善残疾人教育成果干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 6;21(1):e70016. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70016. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施所产生的意外后果:一项范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD015397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.pub2.
9
The effects of small class sizes on students' academic achievement, socioemotional development and well-being in special education: A systematic review.小班教学对特殊教育中学生学业成绩、社会情感发展和幸福感的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 14;19(3):e1345. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1345. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing the transparency of systematic reviews: presenting a generalized registration form.提高系统评价透明度:呈现通用注册表格。
Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 22;12(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02281-7.
2
Establishing the effectiveness of technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: a systematic review.技术支持的痴呆症教育对卫生和社会保健从业者的有效性评估:系统综述。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 21;10(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01781-8.
3
Technology-enhanced and game based learning for children with special needs: a systematic mapping study.
针对特殊需求儿童的技术增强型和基于游戏的学习:一项系统映射研究。
Univers Access Inf Soc. 2023;22(1):227-240. doi: 10.1007/s10209-021-00824-0. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches.一种系统的检索方法:一种开发文献检索的高效且完整的方法。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):531-541. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.