Alshahrani Mohammed, Parikh Vedant, Foley Brandon, Raisinghani Nishank, Verkhivker Gennady
Keck Center for Science and Engineering, Graduate Program in Computational and Data Sciences, Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USA.
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Biomolecules. 2025 Feb 8;15(2):249. doi: 10.3390/biom15020249.
A growing body of experimental and computational studies suggests that the cross-neutralization antibody activity against Omicron variants may be driven by the balance and tradeoff between multiple energetic factors and interaction contributions of the evolving escape hotspots involved in antigenic drift and convergent evolution. However, the dynamic and energetic details quantifying the balance and contribution of these factors, particularly the balancing nature of specific interactions formed by antibodies with epitope residues, remain largely uncharacterized. In this study, we performed molecular dynamics simulations, an ensemble-based deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 spike residues, and binding free energy computations for two distinct groups of broadly neutralizing antibodies: the E1 group (BD55-3152, BD55-3546, and BD5-5840) and the F3 group (BD55-3372, BD55-4637, and BD55-5514). Using these approaches, we examined the energetic determinants by which broadly potent antibodies can largely evade immune resistance. Our analysis revealed the emergence of a small number of immune escape positions for E1 group antibodies that correspond to the R346 and K444 positions in which the strong van der Waals and interactions act synchronously, leading to the large binding contribution. According to our results, the E1 and F3 groups of Abs effectively exploit binding hotspot clusters of hydrophobic sites that are critical for spike functions along with the selective complementary targeting of positively charged sites that are important for ACE2 binding. Together with targeting conserved epitopes, these groups of antibodies can lead expand the breadth and resilience of neutralization to the antigenic shifts associated with viral evolution. The results of this study and the energetic analysis demonstrate excellent qualitative agreement between the predicted binding hotspots and critical mutations with respect to the latest experiments on average antibody escape scores. We argue that the E1 and F3 groups of antibodies targeting binding epitopes may leverage strong hydrophobic interactions with the binding epitope hotspots that are critical for the spike stability and ACE2 binding, while escape mutations tend to emerge in sites associated with synergistically strong hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.
越来越多的实验和计算研究表明,针对奥密克戎变体的交叉中和抗体活性可能由多种能量因素以及抗原漂移和趋同进化中不断演变的逃逸热点的相互作用贡献之间的平衡和权衡所驱动。然而,量化这些因素的平衡和贡献的动态和能量细节,特别是抗体与表位残基形成的特定相互作用的平衡性质,在很大程度上仍未得到表征。在本研究中,我们进行了分子动力学模拟、基于整体的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)刺突残基深度突变扫描,以及针对两组不同的广泛中和抗体的结合自由能计算:E1组(BD55-3152、BD55-3546和BD5-5840)和F3组(BD55-3372、BD55-4637和BD55-5514)。使用这些方法,我们研究了广泛有效的抗体能够在很大程度上规避免疫抗性的能量决定因素。我们的分析揭示了E1组抗体出现了少量免疫逃逸位点,这些位点对应于R346和K444位置,其中强范德华力和相互作用同步起作用,导致较大的结合贡献。根据我们的结果,E1和F3组抗体有效地利用了对刺突功能至关重要的疏水位点的结合热点簇,以及对血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)结合很重要的带正电位点的选择性互补靶向。连同靶向保守表位,这些组别的抗体可以扩大中和对与病毒进化相关的抗原转变的广度和弹性。本研究结果和能量分析表明,预测的结合热点和关键突变与最新的平均抗体逃逸分数实验在定性上具有出色的一致性。我们认为,靶向结合表位的E1和F3组抗体可能利用与对刺突稳定性和ACE2结合至关重要的结合表位热点的强疏水相互作用,而逃逸突变往往出现在与协同强疏水和静电相互作用相关的位点。