Wanders Lisa, Gijbels Anouk, Hul Gabby B, Feskens Edith J M, Afman Lydia A, Blaak Ellen E, Hopman Maria T E, Goossens Gijs H, Thijssen Dick H J
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Physiology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
TiFN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2601-2612. doi: 10.1111/dom.16261. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
Individuals with liver insulin-resistant (LIR) or muscle insulin-resistant (MIR) phenotypes may respond differently to dietary interventions. Given the interaction between insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk, this sub-analysis of the PERSON study examined whether a personalized diet according to MIR or LIR phenotypes improves vascular function and cardiovascular disease risk factors.
We randomized 119 participants to a 12-week low-fat, high-protein, high-fibre diet (LFHP; may be optimal for LIR) or Mediterranean diet (high in monounsaturated fat, HMUFA; may be optimal for MIR). Randomization linked the insulin-resistant (IR) phenotype to the proposed optimal diet, leading to PhenoDiet A (MIR-HMUFA and LIR-LFHP) and PhenoDiet B (MIR-LFHP and LIR-HMUFA). Before and after the intervention, vascular function (carotid artery reactivity) and cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and Framingham risk score) were examined. A 7-point oral glucose tolerance test was performed to determine insulin resistance (Matsuda index and HOMA-IR) and disposition index.
Following drop-out (n = 18), 101 participants finished the intervention (54 women, 61 ± 7 years, 27.6 [26.4;30.0] kg/m), with n = 80 available for the primary outcome of vascular function. Overall, the dietary interventions significantly decreased blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and the Framingham risk score (all p < 0.05), while vascular function was not affected (p = 0.485). Insulin resistance (p ≤ 0.001), but not disposition index (p = 0.362), was significantly improved after intervention. The Matsuda index (p = 0.078) tended to increase more and total cholesterol (p = 0.052) tended to decrease more in PhenoDiet group B than A, but other changes in outcome parameters were not significantly different between PhenoDiet groups. The LFHP diet resulted in more pronounced improvements in cholesterol, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and insulin resistance compared with the HMUFA diet (all p < 0.05).
A 12-week diet improves metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, but not vascular function in insulin-resistant adults with overweight or obesity. Whilst the LFHP diet resulted in greater improvements in cardiometabolic risk markers than the HMUFA diet, we found no significant differences between the PhenoDiet groups.
具有肝脏胰岛素抵抗(LIR)或肌肉胰岛素抵抗(MIR)表型的个体对饮食干预的反应可能不同。鉴于胰岛素抵抗与心血管风险之间的相互作用,本项针对PERSON研究的亚分析探讨了根据MIR或LIR表型制定的个性化饮食是否能改善血管功能和心血管疾病风险因素。
我们将119名参与者随机分为两组,一组接受为期12周的低脂、高蛋白、高纤维饮食(LFHP;可能对LIR最为适宜),另一组接受地中海饮食(富含单不饱和脂肪,HMUFA;可能对MIR最为适宜)。随机分组将胰岛素抵抗(IR)表型与建议的最佳饮食相联系,从而形成了表型饮食A(MIR-HMUFA和LIR-LFHP)和表型饮食B(MIR-LFHP和LIR-HMUFA)。在干预前后,检测血管功能(颈动脉反应性)和心血管风险因素(血压、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和弗雷明汉风险评分)。进行7点口服葡萄糖耐量试验以确定胰岛素抵抗(松田指数和稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数)和处置指数。
在18名参与者退出研究后,101名参与者完成了干预(54名女性,年龄61±7岁,体重指数27.6[26.4;30.0]kg/m²),其中80名参与者可用于血管功能这一主要结局的分析。总体而言,饮食干预显著降低了血压、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和弗雷明汉风险评分(均p<0.05),而血管功能未受影响(p=0.485)。干预后胰岛素抵抗显著改善(p≤0.001),但处置指数未改善(p=0.362)。与表型饮食A组相比,表型饮食B组的松田指数升高趋势更明显(p=0.078),总胆固醇降低趋势更明显(p=0.052),但两组间其他结局参数的变化无显著差异。与HMUFA饮食相比,LFHP饮食在胆固醇、舒张压(DBP)和胰岛素抵抗方面的改善更为显著(均p<0.05)。
为期12周的饮食改善了超重或肥胖胰岛素抵抗成年人的代谢和心血管结局,但未改善血管功能。虽然LFHP饮食在改善心脏代谢风险标志物方面比HMUFA饮食更显著,但我们发现表型饮食组之间没有显著差异。