Nair-Desai Sameer, Chambers Laura C, Soto Mark J, Behr Caroline, Lovgren Leah, Zandstra Tamsin, Rivkees Scott A, Rosenthal Ning, Beaudoin Francesca L, Tsai Thomas C
Office of the Dean, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
BMJ Public Health. 2023 Nov 7;1(1):e000263. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000263. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Despite complex care needs during critical COVID-19, the associated long-term healthcare spending is poorly understood, limiting the ability of policy-makers to prioritise necessary care and plan for future medical countermeasures.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalised with COVID-19 in the USA (April‒June 2020) using data from the national PINC AI Healthcare Database. Patients were followed for 365 days to measure hospital spending starting on the date of admission. We used a multivariable logistic model to identify characteristics associated with high spending.
Among 73 606 patients hospitalised with COVID-19, 73% were aged ≥50 years, 51% were female, and 37% were non-Hispanic white. Mean hospital spending per patient over 90 days was US$28 712 (SD=US$48 583) and over 365 days was US$31 768 (SD=US$52 811). Patients who received care in the intensive care unit (36% vs 23% no intensive care, p<0.001), received a non-recommended COVID-19 treatment (28% vs 25% no treatment, p<0.001), had a longer length of stay (p<0.001), and had Medicare (27% vs 22% commercial, p<0.001) or Medicaid (25% vs 22% commercial, p<0.001) insurance were associated with a higher predicted probability of high hospital spending over 365 days. Patients who received recommended treatment (21% vs 25% no treatment, p<0.001) and were Hispanic and any race (24% vs 26% non-Hispanic white, p<0.001), non-Hispanic Asian (25% vs 26% non-Hispanic white, p=0.011), 'other' or unknown race and ethnicity (24% vs 26% non-Hispanic white, p<0.001), or female (25% vs 26% male, p<0.001) were associated with a lower predicted probability of high hospital spending.
Most hospital spending incurred over 1 year was for care within 90 days of admission. Patients receiving complex care or non-recommended treatments were associated with higher spending, while those receiving recommended treatments were associated with lower spending. These findings can inform pandemic preparedness planning.
尽管新冠肺炎危重症患者有复杂的护理需求,但与之相关的长期医疗支出却鲜为人知,这限制了政策制定者对必要护理进行优先排序并为未来医疗应对措施进行规划的能力。
我们利用国家PINC AI医疗数据库的数据,对2020年4月至6月在美国因新冠肺炎住院的成年人进行了一项回顾性队列研究。从入院日期开始对患者进行365天的随访,以衡量住院费用。我们使用多变量逻辑模型来确定与高支出相关的特征。
在73606例因新冠肺炎住院的患者中,73%年龄≥50岁,51%为女性,37%为非西班牙裔白人。每位患者90天的平均住院费用为28712美元(标准差=48583美元),365天的平均住院费用为31768美元(标准差=52811美元)。在重症监护病房接受治疗的患者(36%对比未在重症监护病房治疗的23%,p<0.001)、接受了不推荐的新冠肺炎治疗的患者(28%对比未接受治疗的25%,p<0.001)、住院时间更长的患者(p<0.001),以及拥有医疗保险(27%对比商业保险的22%,p<0.001)或医疗补助保险(25%对比商业保险的22%,p<0.001)的患者,其365天内住院高支出的预测概率更高。接受推荐治疗的患者(21%对比未接受治疗的25%,p<0.001),以及西班牙裔和其他任何种族的患者(24%对比非西班牙裔白人的26%,p<0.001)、非西班牙裔亚裔患者(25%对比非西班牙裔白人的26%,p=0.011)、“其他”或种族和族裔未知的患者(24%对比非西班牙裔白人的26%,p<0.001),或女性患者(25%对比男性的26%,p<0.001),其住院高支出的预测概率较低。
1年多的住院费用大多用于入院后90天内的护理。接受复杂护理或不推荐治疗的患者支出较高,而接受推荐治疗的患者支出较低。这些发现可为大流行防范规划提供参考。