• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An early evaluation of team consistency and scope optimization in team-based cancer care.基于团队的癌症护理中团队一致性和范围优化的早期评估。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13644-9.
2
Team-based care in specialist practice: a path to improved physician experience in British Columbia.专科医师实践中的团队式照护:提升不列颠哥伦比亚省医师体验的途径。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11482-2.
3
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
4
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
7
Perceived Effectiveness of Home-Based Primary Care Teams in Veterans Health Administration.退伍军人健康管理局中基于家庭的初级保健团队的感知有效性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):494-502. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny174.
8
Processes in healthcare teams that include nurse practitioners: what do patients and families perceive to be effective?包括执业护士在内的医疗团队中的流程:患者和家属认为哪些是有效的?
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Mar;25(5-6):619-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13085. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Do primary care professionals agree about progress with implementation of primary care teams: results from a cross sectional study.基层医疗专业人员对基层医疗团队的实施进展是否达成共识:一项横断面研究的结果
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 22;17(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0541-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Well-Being Parameters and Intention to Leave Current Institution Among Academic Physicians.学术医师的幸福感参数和离开当前机构的意愿。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2347894. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47894.
2
Effect of Surgical Care Team Consistency During Urologic Procedures on Surgical Efficiency and Perioperative Outcomes.泌尿外科手术中外科护理团队一致性对手术效率和围手术期结局的影响。
Urology. 2023 May;175:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
3
Toward Team-Based Cancer Care in the United States: 6 Years Later.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jan;19(1):3-5. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00723. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
4
Scoping Review to Inform the Future Development of a Measure for Team-Based Care in Oncology.范围综述,为肿瘤学中基于团队的照护措施的未来发展提供信息。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jan;19(1):e43-e52. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00308. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
Team-Based Care for Cancer Survivors With Comorbidities: A Systematic Review.基于团队的共病癌症幸存者照护:系统评价。
J Healthc Qual. 2022;44(5):255-268. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000354.
6
Determinants Affecting the Rationing of Nursing Care and Professional Burnout among Oncology Nurses.影响肿瘤专科护士护理分配和职业倦怠的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 11;19(12):7180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127180.
7
Optimizing nurses' enacted scope of practice to its full potential as an integrated strategy for the continuous improvement of clinical performance: A multicentre descriptive analysis.优化护士的实践范围,充分发挥其潜力,作为持续改善临床绩效的综合策略:一项多中心描述性分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jan;30(1):205-213. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13473. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
8
The National Standard of Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace: A Psychometric and Descriptive Study of the Nursing Workforce in British Columbia Hospitals.《工作场所心理健康与安全国家标准:不列颠哥伦比亚省医院护理人员的心理计量学和描述性研究》。
Can J Nurs Res. 2021 Dec;53(4):405-416. doi: 10.1177/0844562120986032. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Team Processes in Canadian Primary Healthcare: A Realist Review.加拿大初级医疗保健中的团队流程:一个现实主义的综述。
Healthc Q. 2020 Jul;23(2):50-57. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2020.26274.
10
Organizational Conditions That Impact the Implementation of Effective Team-Based Models for the Treatment of Diabetes for Low Income Patients-A Scoping Review.组织条件对实施针对低收入患者的糖尿病有效团队治疗模式的影响:范围综述。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 15;11:352. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00352. eCollection 2020.

基于团队的癌症护理中团队一致性和范围优化的早期评估。

An early evaluation of team consistency and scope optimization in team-based cancer care.

作者信息

Lambert Leah K, Havaei Farinaz, Beck Scott M, Ma Andy, Larmet John, Kaur Jagbir, Adhami Nassim, Le Dan, Woods Ryan

机构信息

BC Cancer, Provincial Health Services Authority, Vancouver, Canada.

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13644-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-025-13644-9
PMID:40022018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11869398/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The British Columbia (BC) government has made significant investments towards the implementation of team-based care (TBC) in its provincial comprehensive cancer control program. TBC implementation involves purposeful efforts towards: (a) establishing/expanding multidisciplinary care teams, (b) optimizing scope of practice, and (c) increasing care team consistency. Study objectives include an early-phase evaluation of (i) the association between TBC elements and team effectiveness and (ii) staff perceptions of barrier and facilitators of team effectiveness.

METHODS

A series of five surveys over a 2-year period will be administered to prospectively evaluate the ongoing implementation of TBC. This study draws on data from the first of the five planned surveys, administered in May 2023. Eligible respondents included 299 program employees-spanning various roles such as physicians, nurses, and unit clerks-working within TBC at the time of survey deployment. The survey included both validated and researcher-developed questions that were either closed or open-ended, including measures of team composition, team consistency, team effectiveness, scope of practice, and demographics. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and regression analysis; qualitative data were analyzed guided by interpretive description methodology.

RESULTS

Collected responses totaled 121, with the majority of respondents being women (76%), full-time employees (90%), and working in direct patient care (77%). Regression analyses indicated that (i) higher frequency of consistently working with the same team members and (ii) lower proportion of shifts practicing below scope are both significant predictors of higher team effectiveness ratings. Qualitative data highlighted staffing levels as a driver of under- and over-utilized scopes of practice. Furthermore, effective communication, enhanced knowledge of each team member's scope of practice, and strong interpersonal relationships were highlighted as contributing factors to effectiveness among multidisciplinary care teams.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings from the first of five prospective surveys highlight team consistency and role optimization as drivers of effective teamwork in the early implementation of a team-based model of cancer care. Future research should explore contextual factors that influence cancer care staff and clinicians' perceptions of effectiveness.

摘要

背景

不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)政府已在其省级综合癌症控制项目中对实施团队式护理(TBC)进行了大量投资。TBC的实施涉及有针对性地努力实现以下目标:(a)建立/扩大多学科护理团队,(b)优化执业范围,以及(c)提高护理团队的一致性。研究目标包括对(i)TBC要素与团队有效性之间的关联以及(ii)工作人员对团队有效性的障碍和促进因素的看法进行早期评估。

方法

将在两年内进行一系列五次调查,以前瞻性评估TBC的持续实施情况。本研究借鉴了计划中的五次调查中的第一次调查的数据,该调查于2023年5月进行。符合条件的受访者包括299名项目员工,涵盖医生、护士和科室文员等各种角色,他们在调查开展时在TBC范围内工作。该调查包括经过验证的问题和研究人员开发的问题,这些问题既有封闭式的,也有开放式的,包括团队组成、团队一致性、团队有效性、执业范围和人口统计学等方面的测量。定量数据采用描述性和回归分析进行分析;定性数据采用解释性描述方法进行分析。

结果

共收集到121份回复,大多数受访者为女性(76%)、全职员工(90%),且从事直接患者护理工作(77%)。回归分析表明,(i)与相同团队成员持续合作的频率较高以及(ii)低于执业范围的班次比例较低,都是团队有效性评分较高的重要预测因素。定性数据强调人员配备水平是执业范围利用不足和过度利用的驱动因素。此外,有效的沟通、对每个团队成员执业范围的深入了解以及牢固的人际关系被强调为多学科护理团队有效性的促成因素。

结论

五次前瞻性调查中的第一次调查的初步结果突出了团队一致性和角色优化是基于团队的癌症护理模式早期实施中有效团队合作的驱动因素。未来的研究应探索影响癌症护理人员和临床医生对有效性看法的背景因素。