用于蛋白质组学和磷酸蛋白质组学的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织与新鲜冷冻匹配组织的重叠

Overlap of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded and Fresh-Frozen Matched Tissues for Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics.

作者信息

Humphries Erin M, Hains Peter G, Robinson Phillip J

机构信息

ProCan, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia.

出版信息

ACS Omega. 2025 Feb 16;10(7):6891-6900. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c09289. eCollection 2025 Feb 25.

Abstract

Many liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) studies have compared formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues with matched fresh-frozen (FF) tissues to examine the effect of preservation techniques on the proteome; however, few studies have included the phosphoproteome. A high degree of overlap and correlation between the two preservation techniques would demonstrate the importance of FFPE tissues as a valuable biomedical resource. Our aim was to quantitatively compare the proteome and phosphoproteome of matched FFPE and FF tissues using data-independent acquisition LC-MS. Four organs from three rats were cut in half to produce matched FFPE and FF tissue pairs. Excellent overlaps of 85-97% for the proteome and 82-98% for the phosphoproteome were observed, depending on the organ type, between the two preservation techniques. Most of the unique identifications were found in FF with less than 0.3% being unique to FFPE tissues. Strong agreement between FFPE and FF matched tissue pairs was observed with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.93-0.97 and 0.79-0.87 for the proteome and phosphoproteome, respectively. Digestion efficiency was slightly higher in FFPE (92-94%) than in FF tissues (86-89%), and a search of a data subset for formaldehyde induced chemical modifications revealed that only 0.05% of precursors were unique to FFPE tissues. This suggests that with quality sample preparation methods it is not necessary to include formaldehyde induced chemical modifications when analyzing FFPE tissues. We attribute the lower number of identifications in FFPE tissues to inaccurate peptide quantitation, which resulted in a lower MS peptide load and tryptic peptide enrichment load. Our results demonstrate that both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses of FFPE and FF tissues are highly comparable and highlight the suitability of FFPE tissues for both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.

摘要

许多液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS)研究已将福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织与匹配的新鲜冷冻(FF)组织进行比较,以研究保存技术对蛋白质组的影响;然而,很少有研究涉及磷酸化蛋白质组。两种保存技术之间的高度重叠和相关性将证明FFPE组织作为一种有价值的生物医学资源的重要性。我们的目的是使用数据非依赖采集LC-MS对匹配的FFPE和FF组织的蛋白质组和磷酸化蛋白质组进行定量比较。将三只大鼠的四个器官切成两半,以产生匹配的FFPE和FF组织对。根据器官类型,两种保存技术之间蛋白质组的重叠率为85%-97%,磷酸化蛋白质组的重叠率为82%-98%。大多数独特的鉴定结果出现在FF中,FFPE组织中独特的鉴定结果不到0.3%。FFPE和FF匹配组织对之间观察到很强的一致性,蛋白质组和磷酸化蛋白质组的皮尔逊相关系数分别为0.93-0.97和0.79-0.87。FFPE中的消化效率(92%-94%)略高于FF组织(86%-89%),对甲醛诱导的化学修饰数据子集的搜索显示,只有0.05%的前体是FFPE组织特有的。这表明,采用高质量的样品制备方法时,分析FFPE组织时无需考虑甲醛诱导的化学修饰。我们将FFPE组织中鉴定数量较少归因于肽定量不准确,这导致较低的质谱肽负荷和胰蛋白酶肽富集负荷。我们的结果表明,FFPE和FF组织的蛋白质组学和磷酸化蛋白质组学分析具有高度可比性,并突出了FFPE组织在蛋白质组学和磷酸化蛋白质组学分析中的适用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a107/11865994/18825bc6d412/ao4c09289_0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索