Suppr超能文献

干扰电流疗法对膝骨关节炎的疗效:一项比较不同载波频率效果的随机双盲初步研究。

The efficacy of interferential current treatment on knee osteoarthritis: A pilot randomized double-blind study comparing the effects of different carrier frequencies.

作者信息

Ata Benil Nesli, Durmaz Berrin, Çınar Ece, Atamaz Calis Funda

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Çiğli Regional Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Türkiye.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 31;70(4):517-524. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12390. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the effects of different carrier frequencies of interferential current (IFC) treatment on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 10-m walk test, and the amount of paracetamol taken.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The double-blind, randomized controlled study included 61 patients (16 males, 45 females; mean age: 63.7±9.8 years; range, 50 to 80 years) with knee osteoarthritis who were randomized to three treatment groups: 2,000 Hz, 4,000 Hz, and 8,000 Hz. The study was conducted between February 2019 and October 2019. Subjects received IFC treatment for 20 min five times per week for three weeks. All subjects were prescribed a home exercise program. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at three and seven weeks. The primary outcome was VAS to assess knee pain.

RESULTS

Treatment with IFC yielded significant results in VAS pain, WOMAC pain, and WOMAC function parameters in all three groups, but no significant difference was shown among the three groups. The WOMAC stiffness parameter was found to benefit from the treatment only in the first group, while the 10-m walk test improved for the first and third groups. The number of paracetamol tablets taken differed significantly neither in nor among the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Previous trials have found a significant reduction in knee pain levels and an increase in function with IFC treatment, although there is no consensus on which carrier frequencies and duration to choose for IFC treatment. In this study, we detected significant benefits for all the different carrier frequency groups but were not able to show any to be superior to the others.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨不同载波频率的干扰电流(IFC)治疗对疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、10米步行试验以及对乙酰氨基酚服用量的影响。

患者与方法

这项双盲、随机对照研究纳入了61例膝骨关节炎患者(16例男性,45例女性;平均年龄:63.7±9.8岁;范围50至80岁),他们被随机分为三个治疗组:2000赫兹、4000赫兹和8000赫兹。研究于2019年2月至2019年10月进行。受试者接受IFC治疗,每周5次,每次20分钟,共3周。所有受试者都被规定了家庭锻炼计划。在基线、3周和7周时对患者进行评估。主要结局指标是用于评估膝关节疼痛的VAS。

结果

IFC治疗在所有三个组的VAS疼痛、WOMAC疼痛和WOMAC功能参数方面均产生了显著效果,但三组之间未显示出显著差异。仅在第一组中发现WOMAC僵硬参数从治疗中获益,而第一组和第三组的10米步行试验有所改善。治疗组内和组间对乙酰氨基酚片的服用数量均无显著差异。

结论

先前的试验发现IFC治疗可显著降低膝关节疼痛水平并提高功能,尽管对于IFC治疗应选择何种载波频率和持续时间尚无共识。在本研究中,我们发现所有不同载波频率组均有显著益处,但未能表明任何一组优于其他组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd29/11868852/78071c9d6510/TJPMR-2024-70-4-517-524-F1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验