Madsen Benedicte Grøngaard, Tsuchiya Emma Atsuko, Christensen Gustav Borghegn Blak, Heiberg Johan, Krag Mette
Department of Anaesthesia, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70013. doi: 10.1111/aas.70013.
Nasotracheal intubation is commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgeries due to its improved access to the surgical field. However, the technique can lead to complications like epistaxis and mucosal injuries. The choice of tube and other equipment may impact patient outcomes. This review aims to explore how different tubes and equipment affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) statement, we plan to carry out a scoping review of studies examining the impact of different tubes and equipment on patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation in adults. We will assess study design, population, type of tube and equipment, and patient outcomes across the included studies.
We plan to provide descriptive analyses of the included studies accompanied by tabulated results to summarize key findings and identify patterns in the data.
This scoping review will summarize the existing evidence on how tube and equipment choices affect patient outcomes during nasotracheal intubation.
由于经鼻气管插管能更好地暴露手术视野，因此在口腔颌面外科手术中常用。然而，该技术可能导致鼻出血和黏膜损伤等并发症。导管及其他设备的选择可能会影响患者的预后。本综述旨在探讨不同的导管及设备在经鼻气管插管过程中如何影响患者的预后。
根据系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述报告规范（PRISMA-ScR）声明，我们计划对研究不同导管及设备对成人经鼻气管插管患者预后影响的研究进行范围综述。我们将评估纳入研究的研究设计、研究对象、导管及设备类型和患者预后。
我们计划对纳入研究进行描述性分析，并以表格形式呈现结果，以总结主要发现并识别数据中的模式。
本范围综述将总结关于导管及设备选择如何影响经鼻气管插管患者预后的现有证据。
