Rasmusen Simon Kristoffer Høgh, Mortensen Jann
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Clin Respir J. 2025 Mar 1;12(1):2470002. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2025.2470002. eCollection 2025.
Total lung capacity (TLC) measured with single-breath gas diffusion (TLCsb) is systematically lower than TLC measured with whole-body plethysmography (TLCwbp) especially in patients with obstructive defects. We aimed to develop and validate a regression correction equation to reduce the discrepancy between the two measurements of TLC. Second, we compared the ability to detect restriction (reduced TLC) from adjusted TLC measured by single-breath (TLCsb) with gold standard TLCwbp.
Lung function data from 800 consecutive patients were analysed with multivariable linear regression. A group of 530 were included for model development, and 270 were used for model validation.
TLCsb was found to be on average 1.1 L lower than TLCwbp ( < 0.001). This difference increased with degree of airway obstruction. After adjustment TLCsb did not significantly differ from TLCwbp in obstructive and mixed obstructive-restrictive subjects. TLCsb had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 99% to predict restriction on an individual basis, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [-19.6%; 17.7%] percentage when comparing adjusted values of TLCsb with the true TLCwbp value.
After adjustment TLCsb was no longer significantly underestimated in obstructive and mixed restrictive-obstructive groups compared to TLCwbp. The adjustment can be used on individual subjects to estimate restriction via the TLCsb, thereby making the single-breath gas diffusion method a more valid alternative than without adjustment, when compared with the gold standard whole-body plethysmography to measure TLC.
采用单次呼吸气体扩散法测量的肺总量(TLCsb)系统性低于采用全身体积描记法测量的肺总量(TLCwbp),尤其是在存在阻塞性缺陷的患者中。我们旨在开发并验证一个回归校正方程,以减少TLC两种测量方法之间的差异。其次,我们比较了通过单次呼吸测量的校正后TLC(TLCsb)检测限制性通气功能障碍(TLC降低)与金标准TLCwbp的能力。
对800例连续患者的肺功能数据进行多变量线性回归分析。530例纳入模型开发,270例用于模型验证。
发现TLCsb平均比TLCwbp低1.1L(<0.001)。这种差异随气道阻塞程度增加。校正后,在阻塞性和混合性阻塞-限制性通气功能障碍受试者中,TLCsb与TLCwbp无显著差异。TLCsb预测个体限制性通气功能障碍的敏感性为70%,特异性为99%,将TLCsb校正值与真实TLCwbp值比较时,95%置信区间(CI)为[-19.6%;17.7%]。
校正后,与TLCwbp相比,阻塞性和混合性限制性-阻塞性通气功能障碍组中TLCsb不再被显著低估。该校正可用于个体受试者,通过TLCsb估计限制性通气功能障碍,从而使单次呼吸气体扩散法与测量TLC的金标准全身体积描记法相比,未经校正时成为更有效的替代方法。