Suppr超能文献

气流阻塞患者单次呼吸氦气肺容积的校正

Correction of single-breath helium lung volumes in patients with airflow obstruction.

作者信息

Punjabi N M, Shade D, Wise R A

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Chest. 1998 Sep;114(3):907-18. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.3.907.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether alveolar volume (V(A)) measured during the single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DCO) can be used as a substitute measure for the multiple-breath total lung capacity (TLC) in subjects with and without airways obstruction.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of pulmonary function test (PFT) results.

SETTING

Pulmonary function laboratories at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and the Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center (HAAC).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients referred for spirometry, helium lung volumes, and Dco during a single visit between November 1993 and November 1996.

RESULTS

JHAAC patients (n=2,477) were used to assess the relationship between V(A) and TLC. In patients with an FEV1/FVC > or = 0.70, there was good agreement between V(A) and TLC (V(A)/TLC=0.97 to 0.99). However, in patients with an FEV1/FVC <0.70, V(A) systematically underestimated TLC (V(A)/TLC=0.67 to 0.94). The degree of underestimation was related to the severity of airflow obstruction. To predict TLC using V(A) a regression equation was used to "correct" V(A) for the severity of obstruction. This equation was used to predict the multiple-breath TLC for JHH patients (n=2,892). Patients with an FEV1/FVC > or = 0.70 showed a high degree of correlation between V(A) and TLC (Pearson's correlation coefficient [r]=0.96 to 0.99; p<0.05). After adjusting for the severity of airflow obstruction, patients with an FEV1/FVC in the range of 0.40 to 0.70 also had a strong correlation between the corrected V(A) and the multiple-breath TLC (r=0.83 to 0.94; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

V(A) accurately predicts TLC in patients with mild or no airflow obstruction. For patients with moderate to severe obstruction, correcting V(A) for the severity of obstruction improves the accuracy of this relatively simple and rapid technique for measuring TLC.

摘要

研究目的

确定在进行单次呼吸一氧化碳弥散量(DCO)检测时所测得的肺泡容积(V(A))能否替代多呼吸法测定的肺总量(TLC),用于有或无气道阻塞的受试者。

设计

对肺功能测试(PFT)结果进行回顾性分析。

地点

约翰霍普金斯医院(JHH)和约翰霍普金斯哮喘与过敏中心(HAAC)的肺功能实验室。

参与者

1993年11月至1996年11月期间单次就诊时接受肺活量测定、氦稀释法肺容积测定和DCO检测的患者。

结果

JHAAC的患者(n = 2477)用于评估V(A)与TLC之间的关系。在第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)/用力肺活量(FVC)≥0.70的患者中,V(A)与TLC之间具有良好的一致性(V(A)/TLC = 0.97至0.99)。然而,在FEV1/FVC <0.70的患者中,V(A)系统性地低估了TLC(V(A)/TLC = 0.67至0.94)。低估程度与气流阻塞的严重程度相关。为了使用V(A)预测TLC,采用回归方程根据阻塞严重程度对V(A)进行“校正”。该方程用于预测JHH患者(n = 2892)的多呼吸法TLC。FEV1/FVC≥0.70的患者中,V(A)与TLC之间显示出高度相关性(皮尔逊相关系数[r] = 0.96至0.99;p < 0.05)。在调整气流阻塞严重程度后,FEV1/FVC在0.40至0.70范围内的患者,校正后的V(A)与多呼吸法TLC之间也具有很强的相关性(r = 0.83至0.94;p < 0.05)。

结论

V(A)能准确预测轻度气流阻塞或无气流阻塞患者的TLC。对于中度至重度阻塞患者,根据阻塞严重程度校正V(A)可提高这种相对简单快速的TLC测量技术的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验