• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估适用于比利时社区环境的D-PRESCRIBE干预措施可行性的方案(END-IT CS研究)。

Protocol to evaluate the feasibility of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention adapted to the Belgian community setting (END-IT CS study).

作者信息

Pétein Catherine, Chevallereau Tina, Aikpitanyi Josephine, Evrard Perrine, Tubeuf Sandy, Henrard Séverine, Spinewine Anne

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacoepidemiology research group, UCLouvain Louvain Drug Research Institute, Brussels, Belgium.

Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 4;15(3):e085434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085434.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085434
PMID:40037665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891543/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRA) deprescribing interventions are needed to tackle high BZRA use in the older population. This study aims to assess the feasibility of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention, adapted from Canada to the Belgian community setting. This pharmacist-led intervention comprises a patient educational brochure and a pharmacist-to-prescriber communication tool.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a feasibility study of a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 8-10 community pharmacies (clusters) and aiming to recruit 56-80 patients (≥65 years). Intervention pharmacies will deliver the adapted D-PRESCRIBE intervention and control pharmacies, usual care. Patients will be blinded to group allocation. Quantitative data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and 6 months through patients' and pharmacists' questionnaires, aiming: (1) to test the feasibility of the intervention, (2) to test the feasibility of the study design needed for its evaluation and (3) to perform an exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis. Hence, data about implementation outcomes, mechanisms of impact (ie, mechanisms through which the intervention is supposed to be effective) and contextual factors will be gathered. Patient-centred outcomes will also be collected as they would be in a full cost-effectiveness trial. The feasibility of the study design will be assessed through participation rate, completeness of the data and a satisfaction survey, sent to participants after the 6-month data collection. Data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. To gain a deeper understanding of pharmacists and patients' experience with the intervention, interviews will be conducted after the 6-month data collection and the Theoretical Domains Framework will be used as a deductive framework for analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of CHU UCL Namur (NUB: B0392023000036). Participants will receive a summary of the results. Results will also be disseminated through the organisation of a local symposium and a peer-reviewed publication.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05929417.

摘要

引言

需要采取苯二氮䓬受体激动剂(BZRA)减药干预措施来解决老年人群中BZRA的高使用量问题。本研究旨在评估从加拿大改编至比利时社区环境的D-PRESCRIBE干预措施的可行性。这项由药剂师主导的干预措施包括一份患者教育手册和一种药剂师与开处方者之间的沟通工具。

方法与分析

我们将进行一项整群随机对照试验的可行性研究,涉及8 - 10家社区药房(群组),目标是招募56 - 80名患者(≥65岁)。干预药房将实施改编后的D-PRESCRIBE干预措施,对照药房提供常规护理。患者将对分组情况不知情。将在基线、3个月和6个月时通过患者和药剂师问卷收集定量数据,目的是:(1)测试干预措施的可行性,(2)测试评估该干预措施所需研究设计的可行性,以及(3)进行探索性成本效益分析。因此,将收集有关实施结果、影响机制(即干预措施预期有效的机制)和背景因素的数据。还将收集以患者为中心的结果,就如同在全面成本效益试验中那样。将通过参与率、数据完整性以及在6个月数据收集后向参与者发送的满意度调查来评估研究设计的可行性。将使用描述性统计方法分析数据。为了更深入地了解药剂师和患者对干预措施的体验,将在6个月数据收集后进行访谈,并将理论领域框架用作演绎分析框架。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得那慕尔大学中心医院伦理委员会批准(编号:B0392023000036)。参与者将收到结果摘要。结果还将通过组织当地研讨会和同行评审出版物进行传播。

试验注册号

NCT05929417。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f2/11891543/580e787cd045/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f2/11891543/580e787cd045/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75f2/11891543/580e787cd045/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Protocol to evaluate the feasibility of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention adapted to the Belgian community setting (END-IT CS study).评估适用于比利时社区环境的D-PRESCRIBE干预措施可行性的方案(END-IT CS研究)。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 4;15(3):e085434. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085434.
2
Interventions to reduce non-prescription antimicrobial sales in community pharmacies.减少社区药房非处方抗菌药物销售的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD013722. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013722.pub2.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Promoting smoking cessation and preventing relapse to tobacco use following a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay (SCEPTRE feasibility study): a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility study protocol.促进戒烟并防止无烟心理健康住院治疗后复吸烟草(SCEPTRE可行性研究):一项多中心随机对照可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):e094441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094441.
8
Timely post-discharge medication reviews to Improve Continuity-the Transitions Of Care stewardship (TIC TOC) study in rural and regional Australia: a parallel-group randomised controlled trial study protocol.澳大利亚农村和地区的及时出院后药物审查以改善连续性——护理过渡管理(TIC TOC)研究:一项平行组随机对照试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e100588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100588.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
A Stop Smoking In Schools Trial in three culturally different middle-income countries (ASSIST global): protocol for a randomised feasibility study.在三个文化背景不同的中等收入国家开展的学校戒烟试验(ASSIST全球):一项随机可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 22;15(6):e096963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096963.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of a theory-based intervention towards benzodiazepine deprescribing in Belgian nursing homes: protocol of the END-IT NH cluster-randomised controlled trial.基于理论的干预措施降低比利时养老院苯二氮䓬类药物处方的可行性:END-IT NH 群组随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e085435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085435.
2
Deprescribing benzodiazepine receptor agonists in older adults: a mixed-methods study to adapt the Canadian D-PRESCRIBE intervention to the Belgian community setting.在老年人中停用苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂:一项适应加拿大 D-PRESCRIBE 干预措施至比利时社区环境的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 17;14(8):e085396. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085396.
3
CompreHensive geriAtRician-led MEdication Review (CHARMER): protocol for a feasibility study of a hospital deprescribing behaviour change intervention.
综合老年医学主导的药物审查(CHARMER):一项医院药物减量行为改变干预措施可行性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 4;13(8):e075795. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075795.
4
Adaptation and validation of the revised Patients' Attitudes towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire for benzodiazepine receptor agonists.修订版患者对减停苯二氮䓬类药物态度问卷(rPATD)在苯二氮䓬类受体激动剂中的适应和验证。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Sep;19(9):1278-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
5
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 3.老年人潜在不适当处方的 STOPP/START 标准:第 3 版。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2023 Aug;14(4):625-632. doi: 10.1007/s41999-023-00777-y. Epub 2023 May 31.
6
A systematic review of randomised-controlled trials on deprescribing outcomes in older adults with polypharmacy.一项关于减少老年多病患者用药的随机对照试验结果的系统评价。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 Jun 30;31(4):349-368. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad025.
7
American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults.美国老年医学学会 2023 年更新了老年人潜在不适当药物使用的 AGS Beers 标准®。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jul;71(7):2052-2081. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18372. Epub 2023 May 4.
8
A protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing Sleepwell, EMPOWER, and treatment-as-usual for benzodiazepine receptor agonist discontinuation in older adults: the your answers when needing sleep in New Brunswick (YAWNS NB) study.一项随机对照试验方案,比较Sleepwell、EMPOWER与常规治疗在老年成人停用苯二氮䓬受体激动剂方面的效果:新不伦瑞克省睡眠需求时的答案(YAWNS NB)研究
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Aug 3;7:100164. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100164. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Belgium.比利时的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):823-836. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00353-3. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.