Suppr超能文献

评估用于去除暂住微生物群的非杀菌洗手方案。

Evaluation of nongermicidal handwashing protocols for removal of transient microbial flora.

作者信息

Vesley D, Lillquist D R, Le C T

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 May;49(5):1067-71. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1067-1071.1985.

Abstract

A method has been described which can compare the efficacy of different nongermicidal handwashing protocols for removal of transient microbial flora without the necessity of establishing or relying on a previously determined baseline for an individual subject. The wash effluent is collected, and colony counts for the effluent reflect the number removed by the wash protocol. A second standard wash in a handwashing machine is performed, and the test criterion is the percent removed in the test wash based on the sum of total CFU recovered from the two washes. The method was used to compare an 8-s cycle for a newly developed handwashing machine with a conventional 15-s Ivory soap wash. When machine pressure was adequate (42 lb/in2), there was no statistically significant difference in the percent removal of transient flora by the two methods (48.8% from the machine versus 45.1% from the Ivory soap wash). At 32 lb/in2, the Ivory soap wash recovered 60.3%, whereas the machine recovered 45.1%.

摘要

已经描述了一种方法,该方法可以比较不同非杀菌洗手方案去除短暂性微生物菌群的效果,而无需为个体受试者建立或依赖先前确定的基线。收集洗涤流出物,流出物的菌落计数反映了洗手方案去除的数量。在洗手机器中进行第二次标准洗涤,测试标准是基于两次洗涤中回收的总CFU之和,计算测试洗涤中去除的百分比。该方法用于比较新开发的洗手机器的8秒周期与传统的15秒象牙皂洗手。当机器压力足够(42磅/平方英寸)时,两种方法去除短暂性菌群的百分比没有统计学上的显著差异(机器洗涤为48.8%,象牙皂洗涤为45.1%)。在32磅/平方英寸时,象牙皂洗涤回收了60.3%,而机器洗涤回收了45.1%。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of nongermicidal handwashing protocols for removal of transient microbial flora.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 May;49(5):1067-71. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1067-1071.1985.
2
Statistical comparison of two handwashing protocols.
Stat Med. 1986 Jul-Aug;5(4):393-6. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780050412.
3
Short- and long-term effects of handwashing with antimicrobial or plain soap in the community.
J Community Health. 2003 Apr;28(2):139-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1022699514610.
4
Quantity of soap as a variable in handwashing.
Infect Control. 1987 Sep;8(9):371-5. doi: 10.1017/s0195941700067436.
6
Assessment of the efficacy of a patient hand wipe: development of a test method.
J Hosp Infect. 2018 Apr;98(4):339-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
7
Effect of a 1 min hand wash on the bactericidal efficacy of consecutive surgical hand disinfection with standard alcohols and on skin hydration.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006 May;209(3):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.01.002. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
8
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
10
Studies of the surgical scrub.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1998 Jan;68(1):65-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04639.x.

引用本文的文献

2
New method for determination of efficacy of health care personnel hand wash products.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Oct;27(10):2295-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2295-2299.1989.

本文引用的文献

1
A CULTURAL METHOD OF QUANTITATIVELY STUDYING THE MICROORGANISMS IN THE SKIN.
J Invest Dermatol. 1964 Aug;43:129-37. doi: 10.1038/jid.1964.130.
2
Hand-washing patterns in medical intensive-care units.
N Engl J Med. 1981 Jun 11;304(24):1465-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198106113042404.
3
A microbiological assay technique for hands.
Health Lab Sci. 1973 Jan;10(1):18-22.
4
5
Application of a gloved-hand model for multiparameter measurements of skin-degerming activity.
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Apr;3(4):406-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.4.406-413.1976.
6
Handwashing practices for the prevention of nosocomial infections.
Ann Intern Med. 1975 Nov;83(5):683-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-83-5-683.
7
Comparison of two methods for assessing the removal of total organisms and pathogens from the skin.
J Hyg (Lond). 1975 Oct;75(2):259-74. doi: 10.1017/s002217240004729x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验