Vesley D, Lillquist D R, Le C T
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 May;49(5):1067-71. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1067-1071.1985.
A method has been described which can compare the efficacy of different nongermicidal handwashing protocols for removal of transient microbial flora without the necessity of establishing or relying on a previously determined baseline for an individual subject. The wash effluent is collected, and colony counts for the effluent reflect the number removed by the wash protocol. A second standard wash in a handwashing machine is performed, and the test criterion is the percent removed in the test wash based on the sum of total CFU recovered from the two washes. The method was used to compare an 8-s cycle for a newly developed handwashing machine with a conventional 15-s Ivory soap wash. When machine pressure was adequate (42 lb/in2), there was no statistically significant difference in the percent removal of transient flora by the two methods (48.8% from the machine versus 45.1% from the Ivory soap wash). At 32 lb/in2, the Ivory soap wash recovered 60.3%, whereas the machine recovered 45.1%.
已经描述了一种方法,该方法可以比较不同非杀菌洗手方案去除短暂性微生物菌群的效果,而无需为个体受试者建立或依赖先前确定的基线。收集洗涤流出物,流出物的菌落计数反映了洗手方案去除的数量。在洗手机器中进行第二次标准洗涤,测试标准是基于两次洗涤中回收的总CFU之和,计算测试洗涤中去除的百分比。该方法用于比较新开发的洗手机器的8秒周期与传统的15秒象牙皂洗手。当机器压力足够(42磅/平方英寸)时,两种方法去除短暂性菌群的百分比没有统计学上的显著差异(机器洗涤为48.8%,象牙皂洗涤为45.1%)。在32磅/平方英寸时,象牙皂洗涤回收了60.3%,而机器洗涤回收了45.1%。