• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子姑息治疗协调系统以支持危及生命疾病患者的预立医疗计划(PREPARE):一项在英格兰使用常规收集的初级和二级医疗数据的多中心观察性研究方案

Evaluation of Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems to support advance care planning for people living with life-threatening conditions (PREPARE): protocol for a multicentre observational study using routinely collected primary and secondary care data in England.

作者信息

Alied Marcel, Law-Clucas Sophie, Allsop Matthew J, Ramsenthaler Christina, May Peter, Bearne Alastair, Powell Margaret, Rosling John, Kumar Rashmi, Scerri Lisa, Williams Rebekah, Sleeman Katherine E, Laverty Diane, James Denzil, Verne Julia, Saravanakumar Kavitha, Costelloe Ceire E, Droney Joanne, Koffman Jonathan

机构信息

Health Informatics, Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e093175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093175.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093175
PMID:40044196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883539/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems (EPaCCS) are electronic registers that aim to facilitate documentation and sharing of up-to-date information about patients' end-of-life preferences and plans for care among different health services. They aim to improve patients' experiences and outcomes and mitigate costs linked to undesired aggressive care. However, evidence on the equitable delivery of EPaCCS and the extent to which advance care planning (ACP) enhances end-of-life care remains sparse. This study aims to explore the effect of EPaCCS on healthcare outcomes, service utilisation, and costs. It will also estimate the association between social determinants of health and the content and use of EPaCCS.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The PREPARE project is a retrospective observational cohort study conducted in two phases. We will analyse routinely collected data from three EPaCCS registers from London, Bradford and Leeds. The first phase will use descriptive analysis to describe the completeness of EPaCCS, the content of EPaCCS, and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals with EPaCCS, and will model the relationship between social determinants of health and completion of ACP components and the creation of EPaCCS. The second phase will use a natural experiment to compare quality indicators (place of death and hospital use) between individuals with EPaCCS and those without. The control groups will be identified through the Leeds decedent dataset and through linking the London EPaCCS register to an electronic record used in North West London. Also, we will quantify healthcare costs and outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Research approval has been secured from the Health Research Authority (ref 24/LO/0194), London - South East Research Ethics Committee (ref 24/LO/0194) and Confidentiality Advisory Group (ref 24/CAG/0046). Dissemination of findings will occur through peer-reviewed publications, knowledge exchange events and collaborative efforts with patient and public involvement partners.

摘要

引言

电子姑息治疗协调系统(EPaCCS)是电子登记册,旨在促进不同医疗服务之间关于患者临终偏好和护理计划的最新信息的记录与共享。其目的是改善患者体验和结局,并降低与不必要的积极治疗相关的成本。然而,关于EPaCCS公平提供以及预先护理计划(ACP)在多大程度上改善临终护理的证据仍然稀少。本研究旨在探讨EPaCCS对医疗保健结局、服务利用和成本的影响。它还将估计健康的社会决定因素与EPaCCS的内容和使用之间的关联。

方法与分析

PREPARE项目是一项分两个阶段进行的回顾性观察队列研究。我们将分析从伦敦、布拉德福德和利兹的三个EPaCCS登记册中常规收集的数据。第一阶段将使用描述性分析来描述EPaCCS的完整性、EPaCCS的内容以及拥有EPaCCS的个体的社会人口统计学和临床特征,并将对健康的社会决定因素与ACP组件的完成以及EPaCCS的创建之间的关系进行建模。第二阶段将使用自然实验来比较拥有EPaCCS的个体和没有EPaCCS的个体之间的质量指标(死亡地点和医院使用情况)。对照组将通过利兹死者数据集以及将伦敦EPaCCS登记册与伦敦西北部使用的电子记录相链接来确定。此外,我们将量化医疗保健成本和结局。

伦理与传播

已获得健康研究管理局(参考号24/LO/0194)、伦敦 - 东南研究伦理委员会(参考号24/LO/0194)和保密咨询小组(参考号24/CAG/0046)的研究批准。研究结果将通过同行评审出版物、知识交流活动以及与患者和公众参与伙伴的合作努力进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/606e/11883539/e9e86d90715c/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/606e/11883539/e9e86d90715c/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/606e/11883539/e9e86d90715c/bmjopen-15-3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems to support advance care planning for people living with life-threatening conditions (PREPARE): protocol for a multicentre observational study using routinely collected primary and secondary care data in England.评估电子姑息治疗协调系统以支持危及生命疾病患者的预立医疗计划(PREPARE):一项在英格兰使用常规收集的初级和二级医疗数据的多中心观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e093175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093175.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
8
Early palliative care for adults with advanced cancer.晚期癌症成年患者的早期姑息治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 12;6(6):CD011129. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011129.pub2.
9
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
10
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care planning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational cohort study of 73 675 patients' records.2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间的预先护理计划:一项对73675份患者记录的观察性队列研究
BJGP Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0145. Print 2024 Dec.
2
Patient and Family Preferences About Place of End-of-Life Care and Death: An Umbrella Review.患者及其家属对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好:伞式综述。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 May;67(5):e439-e452. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.014. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of palliative care in natural experiments: a systematic review.
自然实验中姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Jan 17. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-003993.
4
Mapping and characterising electronic palliative care coordination systems and their intended impact: A national survey of end-of-life care commissioners.绘制和描述电子姑息治疗协调系统及其预期影响:对临终关怀专员的全国调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0275991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275991. eCollection 2022.
5
Improving Care of People With Serious Medical Illness-An Economic Research Agenda for Palliative Care.改善重症患者的护理——姑息治疗的经济研究议程
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 4;3(1):e214464. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4464.
6
"Natural Experiments" in Health Care Research.医疗保健研究中的“自然实验”
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jun 4;2(6):e210290. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0290.
7
Intensity of care in cancer patients in the last year of life: a retrospective data linkage study.癌症患者生命终末期的护理强度:一项回顾性数据链接研究。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Sep;127(4):712-719. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01828-0. Epub 2022 May 11.
8
Report of the Lancet Commission on the Value of Death: bringing death back into life.《柳叶刀》死亡价值委员会报告:让死亡回归生命。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):837-884. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02314-X. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
An introduction to inverse probability of treatment weighting in observational research.观察性研究中治疗权重逆概率法简介。
Clin Kidney J. 2021 Aug 26;15(1):14-20. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab158. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
What's Wrong With Advance Care Planning?预先护理规划存在什么问题?
JAMA. 2021 Oct 26;326(16):1575-1576. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16430.