• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测心源性眩晕时,穿戴式心电图贴片连续监测72小时与传统动态心电图监测24小时效果相当。

Wearable ECG patch monitoring for 72 h is comparable to conventional Holter monitoring for 24 h to detect cardiogenic vertigo.

作者信息

Kim Hyun Ah, Lee Hyung, Park Hyoung-Seob, Ahn Jinhee, Lee Suk-Min, Choi Seo-Young, Oh Eun Hye, Choi Jae-Hwan, Park Ji-Yun, Choi Kwang-Dong

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92472-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-92472-0
PMID:40044882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883029/
Abstract

We sought to compare the diagnostic efficacy of a 72-hour wearable electrocardiography (ECG) patch monitoring with a conventional 24-hour Holter monitoring for the detection of cardiogenic vertigo. We conducted a prospective multicenter study that recruited 47 patients suspected of cardiogenic vertigo in four referral-based university hospitals between November 2019 and April 2022. Patients received simultaneous ambulatory ECG recordings using a 72-hour wearable ECG patch monitoring and a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor. The primary outcome was the detection rate of arrhythmia events during the entire wearing period. The secondary outcomes included device preference and factors affecting the detection of cardiogenic vertigo. During the 72-hour monitoring period, there was no significant difference in the overall detection rate of arrhythmia events between the wearable patch and conventional Holter monitoring (10 of 47 [21.3%] vs. 8 of 47 [17.0%], p = .500) Most patients (46/47) favored a wearable patch over Holter monitoring. The effectiveness of wearable ECG patch monitoring was comparable to conventional Holter monitoring in detecting cardiogenic vertigo. With its extended monitoring capability and patient preference, wearable patch monitoring holds promise as an alternative method for the diagnosis of cardiogenic vertigo. Limitations of this study include small sample size and selection bias.

摘要

我们旨在比较72小时可穿戴式心电图(ECG)贴片监测与传统24小时动态心电图监测对心源性眩晕的诊断效能。我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心研究,在2019年11月至2022年4月期间,从四家以转诊为基础的大学医院招募了47名疑似心源性眩晕的患者。患者同时使用72小时可穿戴式ECG贴片监测和传统24小时动态心电图监测进行动态心电图记录。主要结局是整个佩戴期间心律失常事件的检出率。次要结局包括设备偏好以及影响心源性眩晕检测的因素。在72小时监测期内,可穿戴贴片与传统动态心电图监测在心律失常事件的总体检出率上无显著差异(47例中的10例[21.3%] vs. 47例中的8例[17.0%],p = 0.500)。大多数患者(46/47)更喜欢可穿戴贴片而非动态心电图监测。在检测心源性眩晕方面,可穿戴式ECG贴片监测的有效性与传统动态心电图监测相当。凭借其延长的监测能力和患者偏好,可穿戴贴片监测有望成为诊断心源性眩晕的替代方法。本研究的局限性包括样本量小和选择偏倚。

相似文献

1
Wearable ECG patch monitoring for 72 h is comparable to conventional Holter monitoring for 24 h to detect cardiogenic vertigo.用于检测心源性眩晕时,穿戴式心电图贴片连续监测72小时与传统动态心电图监测24小时效果相当。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92472-0.
2
Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.24 小时动态心电图监测与 14 天新型粘贴式心电图监测的比较。
Am J Med. 2014 Jan;127(1):95.e11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
3
Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours.使用小型单通道、以P波为中心的胸骨心电图监测贴片与标准三导联动态心电图系统在24小时内进行诊断价值比较。
Am Heart J. 2017 Mar;185:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
4
A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.一种新型可穿戴设备,用于连续动态心电图记录:概念验证和信号质量评估。
Biosensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 21;9(1):17. doi: 10.3390/bios9010017.
5
Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring.比较14天粘贴式贴片与24小时动态心电图监测。
Future Cardiol. 2014 May;10(3):319-22. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.24.
6
Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study.24 小时动态心电图与 72 小时单导联心电贴监测在心房颤动检测中的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 9;24(5):e37970. doi: 10.2196/37970.
7
Intermittent short ECG recording is more effective than 24-hour Holter ECG in detection of arrhythmias.间歇性短时间心电图记录比 24 小时动态心电图 Holter 更有效地检测心律失常。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Apr 1;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-41.
8
Three-Day Monitoring of Adhesive Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Patch for Premature Ventricular Complex: Prospective Study for Diagnosis Validation and Evaluation of Burden Fluctuation. adhesive 单导联心电图贴片的三天监测:用于诊断验证和负荷波动评估的前瞻性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 21;26:e46098. doi: 10.2196/46098.
9
Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device.比较可穿戴贴片设备和传统远程监测设备的连续心电图监测。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;35(44):e363. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e363.
10
Enhanced detection of cardiac arrhythmias utilizing 14-day continuous ECG patch monitoring.利用 14 天连续心电图贴片监测增强心律失常检测。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;332:78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The efficacy of detecting arrhythmia is higher with 7-day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring than with 24-h Holter monitoring.与24小时动态心电图监测相比,7天连续心电图贴片监测检测心律失常的效果更高。
J Arrhythm. 2023 May 8;39(3):422-429. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12865. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Comparison Between the 24-hour Holter Test and 72-hour Single-Lead Electrocardiogram Monitoring With an Adhesive Patch-Type Device for Atrial Fibrillation Detection: Prospective Cohort Study.24 小时动态心电图与 72 小时单导联心电贴监测在心房颤动检测中的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 9;24(5):e37970. doi: 10.2196/37970.
3
Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in the Older Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
老年人群心房颤动筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):558-567. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0038.
4
Cardiogenic vertigo: characteristics and proposed diagnostic criteria.心因性眩晕:特征与诊断标准建议。
J Neurol. 2021 Mar;268(3):1070-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10252-4. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Comparison of arrhythmia detection by conventional Holter and a novel ambulatory ECG system using patch and Android App, over 24 h period.传统动态心电图与一种使用贴片和安卓应用程序的新型动态心电图系统在24小时内心律失常检测的比较。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 Mar-Apr;20(2):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.12.013. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
6
When Is Syncope Arrhythmic?晕厥时的心律失常
Med Clin North Am. 2019 Sep;103(5):793-807. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
7
Did This Patient Have Cardiac Syncope?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.该患者是否发生心因性晕厥?:基于临床实践的系统评价。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2448-2457. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8001.
8
Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope.晕厥患者的评估与管理
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2227-2228. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21992.
9
Syncope: Electrocardiographic and Clinical Correlation.晕厥:心电图与临床的相关性
Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2018 Jun;10(2):371-386. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2018.02.007.
10
Syncope and the risk of sudden cardiac death: Evaluation, management, and prevention.晕厥与心源性猝死风险:评估、管理及预防
J Arrhythm. 2017 Dec;33(6):533-544. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Sep 1.