• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对在可存活临界点分娩的家庭的定性研究。

Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making: A qualitative study of families who delivered at the cusp of viability.

作者信息

Schneiderman Katarina S, Henderson Alexa P, Himes Katherine P

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jun;135:108715. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108715. Epub 2025 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108715
PMID:40048823
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is limited data regarding patients' experiences with periviable counseling. Exploring patient perspectives helps us improve provider communication and may aid in supporting high-quality decision-making. Our study explored patient-identified sources of support and conflict during discussions with their healthcare team when delivering during the periviable period with the goal of improving high-quality shared decision making (SDM).

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews of birthing people who delivered between 20 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks gestational age from 2010 to 2014. Interviews focused on shared decision making at the time of periviable birth with an emphasis on the three-talk model of SDM. Interviews were coded to perform thematic analysis.

RESULTS

We interviewed 20 patients who delivered during the periviable period and 6 important others. Participants valued providers aiding in their emotional processing. Conversely, participants identified lack of clarity during counseling and an emphasis on hopelessness as barriers to SDM.

CONCLUSION(S): Participants highlighted the importance of using easy-to-understand language and focusing on hope. Finally, families emphasized the importance of explicitly eliciting values that might inform their choice and the positive impact of nursing staff.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our findings underscore the importance of using a SDM model for periviability counseling and highlight areas for improvement.

摘要

目的

关于可存活期咨询患者体验的数据有限。探索患者观点有助于我们改善医护人员沟通,并可能有助于支持高质量决策。我们的研究探讨了患者在可存活期分娩期间与医护团队讨论时确定的支持和冲突来源,目的是改善高质量的共同决策(SDM)。

方法

我们对2010年至2014年孕龄在20 0/7至25 6/7周之间分娩的产妇进行了半结构化访谈。访谈重点是可存活期分娩时的共同决策,强调SDM的三谈模式。对访谈进行编码以进行主题分析。

结果

我们采访了20名在可存活期分娩的患者和6名其他重要人员。参与者重视医护人员帮助他们进行情绪处理。相反,参与者认为咨询过程中缺乏清晰度以及强调绝望是SDM的障碍。

结论

参与者强调了使用易懂语言和关注希望的重要性。最后,家庭强调了明确引出可能影响其选择的价值观的重要性以及护理人员的积极影响。

实践意义

我们的研究结果强调了使用SDM模型进行可存活期咨询的重要性,并突出了改进领域。

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making: A qualitative study of families who delivered at the cusp of viability.共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对在可存活临界点分娩的家庭的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jun;135:108715. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108715. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Perspectives of physicians and doulas on shared decision-making and decision counseling in the treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorders.医生和导乐对阿片类物质使用障碍孕妇治疗中共同决策和决策咨询的看法。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209526. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209526. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
3
Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography.社区康复中共同决策的经验:聚焦民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4.
4
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.超越利弊 - 开发患者决策辅助工具以培养对话建立关系:来自定性研究和决策辅助工具开发的见解。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5.
5
Evaluating shared decision-making in periviable counseling using objective structured clinical examinations.使用客观结构化临床考试评估极早产儿咨询中的共同决策。
J Perinatol. 2019 Jun;39(6):857-865. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0366-1. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
7
"We will be the ones bearing the consequences": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care.“我们将是承担后果的人”:一项关于医院产科护理中共同决策的障碍与促进因素的定性研究
Birth. 2024 Sep;51(3):581-594. doi: 10.1111/birt.12812. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Perceptions of shared decision making in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative analysis.胃肠病学和炎症性肠病中共同决策的认知:一项定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Oct;115:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107877. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
9
Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.探索面向青少年的美国临床医生对其避孕咨询及共同决策使用情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
10
Exploring patient centredness, communication and shared decision-making under a new model of care: Community rehabilitation in canada.探索以新的医疗模式为背景下的以患者为中心、沟通和共同决策:加拿大社区康复。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 May;30(3):1051-1063. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13304. Epub 2021 Apr 6.