• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生和导乐对阿片类物质使用障碍孕妇治疗中共同决策和决策咨询的看法。

Perspectives of physicians and doulas on shared decision-making and decision counseling in the treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorders.

作者信息

Jeminiwa Ruth, Dadabaev Fadel, Kim Heeyoung, Gannon Megan, Myers Ronald, Abatemarco Diane J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States of America.

Jefferson College of Pharmacy, Thomas Jefferson University, 901 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209526. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209526. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209526
PMID:39343140
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research about the application of shared decision-making (SDM) in the context of Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) for pregnant women with opioid use disorder (OUD) is limited. The objectives of our study were to 1) examine facilitators of and barriers to SDM for the initiation of MAT in clinical practice and 2) evaluate the receptivity of clinicians and doulas involved in the care of women with OUD to the use of an online software application to facilitate SDM about MAT.

METHODS

This qualitative study utilized semi-structured interviews with consenting physicians and doulas who provided care for pregnant women with OUD between November 2021 and May 2022. Participants were asked about factors influencing SDM in practice. In addition, the study asked participants about the feasibility of using the Jefferson Decision Counseling Guide© (JDCG) to educate pregnant women with OUD as to the benefits and risks of undergoing MAT versus no treatment and to help patients clarify their treatment preference. The study recorded the interview and transcribed it verbatim using Rev. transcription services. The study used thematic analyses to code the data and identify key barriers and facilitators of SDM and perceptions of the SDM tool.

RESULTS

Nineteen participants completed interviews. The study identified several barriers to SDM including time constraints, lack of decision counseling tools at points of care, and patients presenting in an actively high state or withdrawing. Peer workers or other trained personnel, giving patients more time, and comfort in decision counseling are examples of facilitators identified by the participants of the study. Participants believed that the counseling tool could facilitate conversations with patients and should be integrated into the workflow.

CONCLUSION

In this qualitative study, we identified several barriers and facilitators of SDM to initiate MAT for pregnant women with OUD. Our findings indicate that there are challenges and opportunities for healthcare systems to increase SDM in this marginalized patient population. Feedback from participants highlighted their receptivity to the use of SDM tools to facilitate meaningful conversations in various settings that can guide decision making about care.

摘要

引言

关于共享决策(SDM)在患有阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)的孕妇药物辅助治疗(MAT)背景下应用的研究有限。我们研究的目的是:1)探讨临床实践中启动MAT时SDM的促进因素和障碍;2)评估参与患有OUD妇女护理的临床医生和助产士对使用在线软件应用程序来促进MAT相关SDM的接受程度。

方法

这项定性研究采用半结构化访谈,对象为2021年11月至2022年5月期间为患有OUD的孕妇提供护理的同意参与的医生和助产士。参与者被问及影响实践中SDM的因素。此外,该研究询问参与者使用杰斐逊决策咨询指南(JDCG)对患有OUD的孕妇进行教育,告知其接受MAT与不接受治疗的益处和风险,并帮助患者明确其治疗偏好的可行性。该研究对访谈进行录音,并使用Rev转录服务逐字转录。该研究使用主题分析对数据进行编码,确定SDM的关键障碍和促进因素以及对SDM工具的看法。

结果

19名参与者完成了访谈。该研究确定了SDM的几个障碍,包括时间限制、护理点缺乏决策咨询工具,以及患者处于积极兴奋状态或正在戒断。同伴工作者或其他受过培训的人员、给患者更多时间以及决策咨询中的舒适度是该研究参与者确定的促进因素的例子。参与者认为咨询工具可以促进与患者的对话,应整合到工作流程中。

结论

在这项定性研究中,我们确定了为患有OUD的孕妇启动MAT时SDM的几个障碍和促进因素。我们的研究结果表明,医疗保健系统在这个边缘化患者群体中增加SDM存在挑战和机遇。参与者的反馈突出了他们对使用SDM工具在各种环境中促进有意义对话的接受程度,这些对话可以指导护理决策。

相似文献

1
Perspectives of physicians and doulas on shared decision-making and decision counseling in the treatment of pregnant women with opioid use disorders.医生和导乐对阿片类物质使用障碍孕妇治疗中共同决策和决策咨询的看法。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2025 Jan;168:209526. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209526. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
"We will be the ones bearing the consequences": A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospital-based maternity care.“我们将是承担后果的人”:一项关于医院产科护理中共同决策的障碍与促进因素的定性研究
Birth. 2024 Sep;51(3):581-594. doi: 10.1111/birt.12812. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
"It's within your own power": shared decision-making to support transitions to buprenorphine.“这掌握在你自己手中”:支持向丁丙诺啡过渡的共同决策。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 7;20(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13722-025-00555-0.
4
Perceptions of shared decision making in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative analysis.胃肠病学和炎症性肠病中共同决策的认知:一项定性分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Oct;115:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107877. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
6
Physician-identified barriers to and facilitators of shared decision-making in the Emergency Department: an exploratory analysis.急诊医师识别的共享决策障碍和促进因素:探索性分析。
Emerg Med J. 2019 Jun;36(6):346-354. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208242. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Barriers and facilitators of healthcare professionals in integrating shared decision-making in pancreatic cancer treatment: A network approach.医疗专业人员在胰腺癌治疗中整合共享决策的障碍和促进因素:网络方法。
Cancer Med. 2024 Oct;13(19):e70218. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70218.
8
Exploring adolescent-facing US clinicians' perceptions of their contraceptive counseling and use of shared decision-making: A qualitative study.探索面向青少年的美国临床医生对其避孕咨询及共同决策使用情况的看法:一项定性研究。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Dec;56(4):337-346. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12283. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
9
Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making: A qualitative study of families who delivered at the cusp of viability.共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对在可存活临界点分娩的家庭的定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Jun;135:108715. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108715. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
10
The Physician-as-Stakeholder: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Physicians' Motivations for Using Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department.作为利益相关者的医生:对急诊科医生使用共同决策动机的探索性定性分析
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1417-1427. doi: 10.1111/acem.13043. Epub 2016 Nov 25.