Vaferi Behzad, Dehbashi Mohsen, Yousefzadeh Reza, Alibak Ali Hosin
Department of Chemical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
Halal Research Center of IRI, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 6;15(1):7806. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92459-x.
Chemicals transfer from the packaging materials and their dissolution in food and water can create health risks. Due to the costly and time-intensive nature of experimental measurements, employing artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies is beneficial. This research uses five renowned AI-based techniques (namely, long short-term memory, gradient boosting regressor, multi-layer perceptron, Random Forest, and convolutional neural networks) to anticipate chemical migration from packaging materials to the food/water structure, considering variables such as temperature, chemical characteristics, and packaging/food types. The relevance analysis has been employed for monitoring the way that these explanatory variables impact the chemical migration from packaging materials into foods and water. Optimizing the hyperparameters, evaluating the prediction accuracy, and comparing the performance of these AI models reveal that the gradient boosting regressor (GBR) is the superior method for this simulation. The proposed GBR model accurately predicts 1847 experimental datasets, showcasing mean squared error, mean absolute error, root mean squared error, relative absolute error percent, and regressing coefficient, of 0.06, 0.15, 0.24, 6.46%, and 0.9961 respectively. Additionally, implementing a leverage algorithm for outlier detection further affirms the reliability of this modeling study.
化学物质从包装材料中迁移出来并溶解在食物和水中会产生健康风险。由于实验测量成本高且耗时,采用人工智能(AI)方法是有益的。本研究使用了五种著名的基于AI的技术(即长短期记忆网络、梯度提升回归器、多层感知器、随机森林和卷积神经网络)来预测化学物质从包装材料向食物/水结构中的迁移,同时考虑温度、化学特性以及包装/食物类型等变量。相关性分析用于监测这些解释变量影响化学物质从包装材料迁移到食物和水中的方式。对这些AI模型进行超参数优化、预测准确性评估和性能比较后发现,梯度提升回归器(GBR)是该模拟的最优方法。所提出的GBR模型准确预测了1847个实验数据集,其均方误差、平均绝对误差、均方根误差、相对绝对误差百分比和回归系数分别为0.06、0.15、0.24、6.46%和0.9961。此外,实施杠杆算法进行异常值检测进一步证实了该建模研究的可靠性。