• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会精神病患者住所中的共享药物协调:为满足当地需求而进行的调整。

Shared medication coordination in a social psychiatric residence: adaptation to meet local requirements.

作者信息

Axelsen Tina Birkeskov, Sørensen Charlotte Arp, Lindelof Anders, Ludvigsen Mette Spliid

机构信息

Hospital Pharmacy, Central Denmark Region, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 240, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.

Regional Psychiatry Randers, Central Denmark Region, Randers, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2
PMID:40050864
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11887218/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared medication coordination (MedCo) is vital yet difficult to manage for residents living with severe mental disorders in residential care, where multidisciplinary teams provide support. A successful Shared MedCo model in one residence included three core components: "shared decision-making," "patient involvement" and "MedCo". This model was effective but transfer to other residential settings needed implementation adaptation. The aim of this study was to meet local MedCo requirements by achieving a good fit between a Shared MedCo intervention core components and a social psychiatric residential context.

METHODS

The methodology was guided by a complex intervention adaptation framework involving co-creation with stakeholders to gather iterative feedback. The intervention was adapted through a systematic four-phase process and tested through shared consultations. Ten residents took part in the test, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability were assessed.

FINDINGS

The adaptation process ensured a good fit between the intervention's core components and the new context. Stakeholder input provided crucial content and contextual insights, while planned adaptations laid the foundation for modulating the individual residence Shared MedCo model. Iterative adaptations during the test phase refined the intervention, leading to near-routine performance by the tenth consultation. Residents gained a stronger voice in their healthcare, and all ten had their medication coordinated and optimised. The intervention was found feasible and acceptable.

CONCLUSION

For effective implementation, complex multidisciplinary Shared MedCo interventions require contextual adaptation and active stakeholder involvement. The shared MedCo intervention offers a guideline for achieving a good fit between the intervention core components and diverse residential contexts, ensuring successful medication coordination for residents living with severe mental disorders.

摘要

背景

对于在提供支持的多学科团队的寄宿护理机构中患有严重精神障碍的居民而言,共享药物协调(MedCo)至关重要但却难以管理。某一寄宿机构中一个成功的共享MedCo模式包含三个核心要素:“共同决策”“患者参与”和“MedCo”。该模式行之有效,但要推广到其他寄宿环境则需要对实施方式进行调整。本研究的目的是通过使共享MedCo干预的核心要素与社会精神病寄宿环境实现良好匹配,以满足当地的MedCo要求。

方法

该方法以一个复杂的干预调整框架为指导,该框架涉及与利益相关者共同创造以收集迭代反馈。通过系统的四个阶段过程对干预措施进行调整,并通过共享协商进行测试。十名居民参与了测试,并对干预措施的可行性和可接受性进行了评估。

结果

调整过程确保了干预措施的核心要素与新环境之间的良好匹配。利益相关者的投入提供了关键的内容和背景见解,而计划中的调整为调整各个寄宿机构的共享MedCo模式奠定了基础。测试阶段的迭代调整对干预措施进行了完善,到第十次协商时已接近常规操作。居民在其医疗保健方面有了更强的话语权,所有十名居民的药物治疗都得到了协调和优化。该干预措施被认为是可行且可接受的。

结论

为有效实施,复杂的多学科共享MedCo干预措施需要根据具体情况进行调整,并让利益相关者积极参与。共享MedCo干预措施为使干预核心要素与不同的寄宿环境实现良好匹配提供了指导方针,确保为患有严重精神障碍的居民成功进行药物协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/1a639ccb5efc/12888_2025_6653_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/90af08905218/12888_2025_6653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/729b4199e56a/12888_2025_6653_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/1a639ccb5efc/12888_2025_6653_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/90af08905218/12888_2025_6653_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/729b4199e56a/12888_2025_6653_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a04d/11887218/1a639ccb5efc/12888_2025_6653_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Shared medication coordination in a social psychiatric residence: adaptation to meet local requirements.社会精神病患者住所中的共享药物协调:为满足当地需求而进行的调整。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06653-2.
2
Person-centred medicine in the care home setting: development of a complex intervention.以人为本的医疗在养老院环境中的应用:一项复杂干预措施的发展。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 27;25(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02437-x.
3
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
4
Using a stakeholder-engaged, iterative, and systematic approach to adapting collaborative decision skills training for implementation in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers.采用利益相关者参与、迭代和系统的方法,对协作决策技能培训进行改编,以便在退伍军人事务部心理康复和恢复中心实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08833-2.
5
A shared decision-making intervention between health care professionals and individuals undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An iterative development process with qualitative methods.医疗专业人员与接受肺康复治疗的个体之间的共同决策干预:采用定性方法的迭代开发过程。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 19;19(8):e0307689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307689. eCollection 2024.
6
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
7
Shared decision making for patients with kidney failure to improve end-of-life care: Development of the DESIRE intervention.为肾衰竭患者进行共同决策以改善临终关怀:DESIRE 干预措施的制定。
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(9):3498-3512. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17209. Epub 2024 May 8.
8
A Mobile Health Intervention to Support Collaborative Decision-Making in Mental Health Care: Development and Usability.一项支持精神卫生保健中共同决策的移动健康干预措施:开发与可用性
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 17;9:e57614. doi: 10.2196/57614.
9
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review.与有复杂护理需求的患者共同决策:范围综述。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Nov 5;25(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02633-9.
2
Shared decision-making in the treatment of bipolar disorder: findings from a nationwide naturalistic cohort study in everyday clinical practice.双相情感障碍治疗中的共同决策:一项日常临床实践中全国性自然队列研究的结果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;60(6):1489-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02761-8. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
A meta-ethnography of shared decision-making in mental health care from the perspective of staff and service users.
从工作人员和服务使用者的角度对精神卫生保健中的共同决策进行的元民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11540-9.
4
Opportunities for nurses to address employee voice in health care providers: a scoping review.护士在医疗服务提供者中表达员工意见的机会:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 13;23(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02331-y.
5
Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.患者参与精神卫生保健-医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点:范围综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;45(8):794-810. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
6
How do nurses advocate for the remaining time of nursing home residents? A critical discourse analysis.护士如何为养老院居民争取剩余时间?一项批评性话语分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 Aug;156:104807. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104807. Epub 2024 May 17.
7
How external and agency characteristics are related to coordination in homecare - findings of the national multicenter, cross-sectional SPOT study.外部和机构特征如何与家庭护理中的协调相关——全国多中心、横断面 SPOT 研究的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10751-4.
8
Life expectancy and years of potential life lost in people with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神障碍患者的预期寿命和潜在寿命损失年数:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Oct 31;65:102294. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102294. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.多学科药物审查和减少老年人用药干预措施在初级保健中为何能良好运行?一项实际审查和综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8.
10
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.