Singh Madhurbain, Chatzinakos Chris, Barr Peter B, Gentry Amanda Elswick, Bigdeli Tim B, Webb Bradley T, Peterson Roseann E
Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
medRxiv. 2025 Feb 24:2025.02.22.25322721. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.22.25322721.
Most genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of depression focus on broad, heterogeneous outcomes, limiting the discovery of genomic risk loci specific to major depressive disorder (MDD). Previous UK Biobank (UKB) studies had limited ability to pinpoint MDD-associated loci due to a smaller sample with strictly defined MDD outcomes and further exclusion of many participants based on ancestry or relatedness, significantly underutilizing this resource's potential for elucidating the genetic architecture of MDD. Here, we present novel genomic insights into MDD by fully utilizing existing UKB data through (1) a trans-ancestry GWAS pipeline using two complementary approaches controlling for population structure and relatedness and (2) an increased sample with MDD symptom-level data across two mental health assessments. We identified strict MDD outcomes among 211,535 participants, representing a 38% increase in eligible participants from prior studies with only one assessment. Ancestrally inclusive analyses yielded 61 genomic risk loci across depression phenotypes, compared to 47 in the analyses restricted to participants genetically similar to European ancestry. Fourteen of these loci, including five novel, were associated with strict MDD phenotypes, whereas only one locus has been previously reported in UKB. MDD-associated genomic loci and predicted gene expression levels showed little overlap with broad depression, indicating higher specificity. Notably, polygenic scores based on these results were significantly associated with depression diagnoses across ancestry groups in the Research Program, highlighting the shared genetic architecture across populations. While the trans-ancestry analyses, which included non-European participants, increased the number of associated loci, the discovery of non-European ancestry-specific loci was limited, underscoring the need for larger, globally representative studies of MDD. Importantly, beyond these results, our GWAS pipeline will facilitate inclusive analyses of other traits and disorders, helping improve statistical power, representation, and generalizability in genomic studies.
大多数抑郁症的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)都聚焦于宽泛、异质性的结果,限制了对重度抑郁症(MDD)特异性基因组风险位点的发现。先前英国生物银行(UKB)的研究由于样本量较小且MDD结果定义严格,以及基于血统或亲属关系进一步排除了许多参与者,因此确定MDD相关位点的能力有限,大大未充分利用该资源阐明MDD遗传结构的潜力。在此,我们通过充分利用现有的UKB数据,对MDD提出了新的基因组见解:(1)采用控制群体结构和亲属关系的两种互补方法的跨血统GWAS流程;(2)在两次心理健康评估中增加具有MDD症状水平数据的样本。我们在211,535名参与者中确定了严格的MDD结果,这比之前仅进行一次评估的研究中符合条件的参与者增加了38%。跨血统分析在抑郁症表型中产生了61个基因组风险位点,而在仅限于与欧洲血统基因相似的参与者的分析中为47个。其中14个位点,包括5个新位点,与严格的MDD表型相关,而之前在UKB中仅报道过1个位点。与MDD相关的基因组位点和预测的基因表达水平与宽泛的抑郁症几乎没有重叠,表明特异性更高。值得注意的是,基于这些结果的多基因评分与研究项目中各血统组的抑郁症诊断显著相关,突出了不同人群共享的遗传结构。虽然纳入了非欧洲参与者的跨血统分析增加了相关位点的数量,但对非欧洲血统特异性位点的发现有限,这凸显了开展更大规模、具有全球代表性的MDD研究的必要性。重要的是,除了这些结果之外,我们的GWAS流程将有助于对其他性状和疾病进行包容性分析,有助于提高基因组研究的统计效力、代表性和普遍性。