Tauber Mark, Hoffelner Thomas, Lehmann Lars, Kraus Natascha, Scheibel Markus, Moroder Philipp
German Shoulder Center, ATOS Clinic, Munich, Germany.
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 25;11(8):23259671231190411. doi: 10.1177/23259671231190411. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking.
It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment.
Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years.
At no follow-up time point was there a significant difference in Constant score between the surgically and nonsurgically treated patients. Radiographic analysis showed not only an inferior coracoclavicular distance at all follow-up points for surgical treatment but also a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications, without any negative clinical correlation. With regard to complications, 1 patient (3%) in the nonsurgical group underwent secondary surgical ACJ stabilization. The revision rate after surgical treatment was 17% ( < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment.
Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates.
ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154).
目前仍缺乏手术治疗与非手术治疗Rockwood 3型肩锁关节(ACJ)脱位疗效对比的优势证据。
假设手术治疗效果优于非手术治疗。
随机对照试验;证据等级,1级。
从2011年1月1日至2016年3月31日,在4个研究中心开展了一项前瞻性随机试验。共有85例急性Rockwood 3型ACJ脱位患者被随机分配接受非手术或手术治疗。共有70例患者按分配方案接受治疗,8例患者从非手术治疗转为早期手术治疗,最终47例患者接受手术治疗,31例患者接受非手术治疗。所有患者均接受纵向随访,包括采用Constant评分进行临床评估和标准化影像学评估,最终随访时间为2年。
在任何随访时间点,手术治疗组和非手术治疗组患者的Constant评分均无显著差异。影像学分析显示,手术治疗组在所有随访点的喙锁距离均较短,创伤后骨关节炎和异位骨化的发生率也较高,且与临床结果无负相关。关于并发症,非手术组有1例患者(3%)接受了二期ACJ手术稳定治疗。手术治疗后的翻修率为17%(P <.001)。非手术治疗后,初次水平不稳定和年轻患者均未出现较差的临床结果。
手术治疗Rockwood 3型ACJ损伤并未带来更好的功能结果。非手术治疗后,年轻患者和水平不稳定患者均未出现较差的结果。手术治疗导致恢复较慢,并发症和翻修率较高。
ISRCTN注册库(研究编号:ISRCTN92265154)