• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性Rockwood 5型肩锁关节脱位患者非手术治疗与关节镜辅助稳定术的临床疗效比较

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Nonoperative Treatment and Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization in Patients With Acute Rockwood Type 5 Acromioclavicular Dislocation.

作者信息

Akgün Doruk, Gebauer Henry, Paksoy Alp, Eckl Larissa, Hayta Agahan, Ücertas Ata, Barthod-Tonnot Nicolas, Dey Hazra Rony-Orijit, Lacheta Lucca, Moroder Philipp, Pawelke Jonas

机构信息

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Sports Orthopedics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 14;12(11):23259671241289117. doi: 10.1177/23259671241289117. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1177/23259671241289117
PMID:39555319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565689/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are initially treated nonoperatively, whereas surgery is recommended for Rockwood type 5 dislocations. However, multiple studies have been published favoring nonoperative approaches in patients with high-grade Rockwood injuries.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with acute Rockwood type 5 AC joint dislocations treated nonoperatively versus with arthroscopically assisted stabilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Included were 48 patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation who were initially treated nonoperatively between June 2010 and June 2022 and 48 patients matched according to age, sex, affected side, and follow-up interval who underwent arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular (CC) stabilization using a suture-button technique, with additional percutaneous AC tape cerclage. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the Subjective Shoulder Value, Nottingham Clavicle Score, Constant score, and visual analog scale for pain. The radiographic assessment included the CC distance, CC difference ratio, and degree of horizontal instability at final follow-up (62 ± 43 months).

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the Constant score was significantly higher in the nonoperative group ( = .02). The operative group had significantly higher pain levels on palpation of the AC joint (1.2 ± 2.2 vs 0.19 ± 0.5 for the nonoperative group; = .003). In the operative group, the mean CC difference ratio was significantly higher at the latest follow-up compared with postoperatively (1.3 ± 0.3 vs 0.67 ± 0.3, respectively; < .001), whereas the CC difference ratio of the nonoperative group was significantly reduced at the latest follow-up compared with postinjury (2.0 ± 0.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.8, respectively; < .001). The operative group had a significantly lower CC difference ratio compared with the nonoperative group at final follow-up ( < .001). More than half of the patients (56%) who were treated operatively had a loss of reduction resulting in a Rockwood type 3 state at the latest follow-up, whereas 54% of patients treated nonoperatively had spontaneous reduction of injury severity from Rockwood type 5 to Rockwood type 3.

CONCLUSION

Although 15% of the nonoperatively treated patients eventually required surgery, successful nonoperative treatment showed similar outcomes to initial operative treatment in patients with acute Rockwood type 5 dislocation.

摘要

背景

目前,Rockwood 3型肩锁关节脱位最初采用非手术治疗,而Rockwood 5型脱位则建议手术治疗。然而,已有多项研究支持对Rockwood损伤程度较高的患者采用非手术方法。

目的

比较急性Rockwood 5型肩锁关节脱位患者非手术治疗与关节镜辅助稳定术的临床和影像学结果。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

纳入2010年6月至2022年6月期间最初接受非手术治疗的48例急性Rockwood 5型脱位患者,以及48例根据年龄、性别、患侧和随访间隔匹配的患者,这些患者采用缝线纽扣技术进行关节镜辅助喙锁(CC)稳定术,并附加经皮肩锁关节胶带环扎术。基于主观肩关节评分、诺丁汉锁骨评分、Constant评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表评估临床结果。影像学评估包括末次随访时(62±43个月)的CC距离、CC差异率和水平不稳定程度。

结果

在末次随访时,非手术组的Constant评分显著更高(P = 0.02)。手术组在触诊肩锁关节时疼痛水平显著更高(手术组为1.2±2.2,非手术组为0.19±0.5;P = 0.003)。在手术组中,与术后相比,最新随访时的平均CC差异率显著更高(分别为1.3±0.3和0.67±0.3;P < 0.001),而非手术组的CC差异率在最新随访时与受伤后相比显著降低(分别为2.0±0.5和2.6±0.8;P < 0.001) 在末次随访时,手术组的CC差异率显著低于非手术组(P < 0.001)。超过一半(56%)接受手术治疗的患者出现复位丢失,在最新随访时导致Rockwood 3型状态,而54%接受非手术治疗的患者损伤严重程度从Rockwood 5型自发减轻至Rockwood 3型。

结论

尽管15%接受非手术治疗的患者最终需要手术,但成功的非手术治疗在急性Rockwood 5型脱位患者中显示出与初始手术治疗相似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1a/11565689/d3d30609f0db/10.1177_23259671241289117-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1a/11565689/0e09b39975d6/10.1177_23259671241289117-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1a/11565689/d3d30609f0db/10.1177_23259671241289117-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1a/11565689/0e09b39975d6/10.1177_23259671241289117-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e1a/11565689/d3d30609f0db/10.1177_23259671241289117-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Nonoperative Treatment and Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization in Patients With Acute Rockwood Type 5 Acromioclavicular Dislocation.急性Rockwood 5型肩锁关节脱位患者非手术治疗与关节镜辅助稳定术的临床疗效比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Nov 14;12(11):23259671241289117. doi: 10.1177/23259671241289117. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.在接受钩板或物理治疗的 III 型和 V 型肩锁关节脱位患者中,2 年随访时临床结果无差异:一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1122-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
3
Results of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment of Rockwood Types III and V Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Prospective, Randomized Trial With an 18- to 20-Year Follow-up.Rockwood Ⅲ型和Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位的手术和非手术治疗结果:一项前瞻性、随机试验,随访 18-20 年。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Dec 11;2(12):2325967114560130. doi: 10.1177/2325967114560130. eCollection 2014 Dec.
4
Treatment options for acute Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular dislocations: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性 Rockwood III-V 型肩锁关节脱位的治疗选择:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):1146-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.039. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
5
Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.手术可改善Rockwood IV型脱位的临床和影像学结果,而Rockwood III型脱位则受益于保守治疗。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06193-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
6
Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: A Prospective Assessment of the Clavicular Hook Plate Versus the Double Double-Button Suture Procedure.急性高等级肩锁关节分离的稳定:锁骨钩板与双双纽扣缝线术的前瞻性评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2725-2734. doi: 10.1177/0363546518788355. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
7
Combined arthroscopically assisted coraco- and acromioclavicular stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.关节镜辅助下治疗急性高分级肩锁关节脱位的锁骨-肩峰端和肩锁关节稳定术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):212-220. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4643-2. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
8
Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomic reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations: 58-month findings.关节镜辅助下急性肩锁关节分离 2 束解剖复位:58 个月随访结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):615-21. doi: 10.1177/0363546512473438. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
9
A Self-Designed Endobutton Installation Device for Coracoclavicular Stabilization in Acute Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.一种用于急性Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位喙锁稳定的自行设计的纽扣钢板植入装置。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Mar;16(3):568-576. doi: 10.1111/os.13995. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
10
Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation Using 2 Clavicular and 1 Coracoid Cortical Fixation Buttons With Suture Tapes.关节镜辅助下使用 2 枚锁骨和 1 枚喙突皮质固定纽扣加缝线固定带重建喙锁韧带治疗急性肩锁关节脱位
Arthroscopy. 2017 Aug;33(8):1458-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joint injuries in contact sports: a narrative review of conservative and surgical treatments.接触性运动中肩锁关节和胸锁关节损伤:保守治疗与手术治疗的叙述性综述
Ann Jt. 2025 Jul 30;10:31. doi: 10.21037/aoj-25-19. eCollection 2025.
2
Surgical treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocations.急性重度肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Mar 10;12(1):e70173. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70173. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury.急性Rockwood 3型肩锁关节损伤手术与非手术治疗的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Aug 25;11(8):23259671231190411. doi: 10.1177/23259671231190411. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Criteria for return to play after operative management of acromioclavicular joint separation: a systematic review.肩锁关节分离手术治疗后重返运动的标准:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Dec 31;2(2):140-148. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.11.005. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Management of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: Comparable Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Bidirectional Arthroscopic-Assisted Stabilization With the Single Low-Profile Suture Button Technique Versus Double-Suture Button Technique.
急性高度肩锁关节脱位的治疗:采用单低轮廓缝线纽扣技术与双缝线纽扣技术双向关节镜辅助稳定术后的临床和放射学结果比较
Arthroscopy. 2023 Nov;39(11):2283-2290. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.015. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment.与延迟手术治疗相比,早期关节镜治疗 IIIb 级和 V 级肩锁关节不稳定的临床效果更好。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6):1185-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.023. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
5
Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery.当前肩锁关节(AC)不稳定的概念——急性和慢性 AC 关节手术的治疗方案建议。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 9;23(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0.
6
Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.关节镜辅助下急性重度肩锁关节脱位的单隧道重建术联合肩锁关节环扎术。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):1185-1192. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03271-6. Epub 2022 May 7.
7
No difference in clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up in patients with type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with hook plate or physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial.在接受钩板或物理治疗的 III 型和 V 型肩锁关节脱位患者中,2 年随访时临床结果无差异:一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Jun;31(6):1122-1136. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
8
High degree of consensus achieved regarding diagnosis and treatment of acromioclavicular joint instability among ESA-ESSKA members.ESSA-ESSKA 成员在肩锁关节不稳定的诊断和治疗方面达成高度共识。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2325-2332. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06286-w. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
9
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.手术与保守干预治疗成人肩锁关节脱位的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 11;10(10):CD007429. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007429.pub3.
10
Factors Predicting the Outcome After Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Acute High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations.关节镜辅助治疗急性高分级肩锁关节脱位的预后预测因素。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Sep;47(11):2670-2677. doi: 10.1177/0363546519862850. Epub 2019 Aug 2.