• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Short Double-J Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time Is Safe and Effective Following Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty: Long-term Results from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.微创肾盂成形术后短双J输尿管支架留置时间安全有效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的长期结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Feb 21;74:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.短期可取出输尿管支架在小儿腹腔镜肾盂成形术中的应用价值
J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):720-5; discussion 725. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.017.
3
One week stenting after pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty; is it enough?小儿腹腔镜肾盂成形术后一周内支架置入;这足够了吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Feb;16(1):98.e1-98.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.10.016. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.470例连续开放性肾盂成形术中外置肾盂输尿管支架与标准支架的疗效分析及成本比较
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.084. Epub 2008 Aug 16.
5
Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.肾盂内成形术与肾盂切开术及腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻的比较
Urology. 2004 Jul;64(1):16-21; discussion 21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.031.
6
Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?利尿肾动态显像上不确定的肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻——有症状的患者应行微创肾盂成形术吗?
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1278-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.100. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Outcomes and costs analysis of Externalized PyeloUreteral versus internal Double-J ureteral stents after paediatric laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.小儿腹腔镜Anderson-Hynes肾盂成形术后外置肾盂输尿管支架与内置双J输尿管支架的疗效及成本分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):232.e1-232.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.006. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
8
Primary pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic obstruction in the USA adult population with or without double-J indwelling ureteral stents. Insurance claims data on contemporary time to removal trends, perioperative complications, health care costs, and re-intervention rates.美国成人人群中肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻,伴或不伴双 J 留置输尿管支架。基于保险索赔数据,探讨当代去除趋势、围手术期并发症、医疗保健费用和再干预率的时间。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Oct;76(5):606-617. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05834-8.
9
Use of double-J ureteric stents post-laparoscopic pyeloplasty to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction in hydronephrosis for pediatric patients: a single-center experience.经腹腔镜肾盂成形术后使用双 J 输尿管支架治疗积水型肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:单中心经验。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Apr;48(4):300060520918781. doi: 10.1177/0300060520918781.
10
External extension of double-J ureteral stent during pyeloplasty: inexpensive stent and non-cystoscopic removal.肾盂成形术中双J输尿管支架管的体外延长:廉价支架及非膀胱镜下取出
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Apr;46(4):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0594-9. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
One- vs 4-week stent placement after laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty: results of a prospective randomised single-centre study.腹腔镜和机器人辅助肾盂成形术后 1 周与 4 周支架置入的比较:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究结果。
BJU Int. 2014 Jun;113(6):931-5. doi: 10.1111/bju.12652.
2
Intraoperative and postoperative complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 236 cases.腹腔镜肾盂成形术的术中及术后并发症:单一手术团队 236 例经验。
J Endourol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1224-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0301. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
3
Peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis only vs continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment in patients with JJ stents: a prospective randomised trial analysing the effect on urinary tract infections and stent-related symptoms.经尿道支架置入术后患者采用介入性抗生素预防治疗与持续低剂量抗生素治疗的前瞻性随机试验:分析对尿路感染和支架相关症状的影响。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):289-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11592.x. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases.119 例连续病例机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗原发性与继发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的分析。
Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):689-94. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.072.
5
Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group.影响微创肾盂成形术结果的因素:多机构腹腔镜和机器人肾盂成形术协作组的结果。
J Urol. 2012 Feb;187(2):522-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.158. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜离断式肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:多中心经验。
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):351-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
Comparison of two different suture methods in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术中两种不同缝合方法的比较
Urol Int. 2011;87(3):304-8. doi: 10.1159/000329368. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
8
Long-term outcome of laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses.腹腔镜肾盂成形术的长期疗效:技术与入路的多中心比较研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jun;21(5):399-403. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0281. Epub 2011 May 11.
9
National practice and outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the United Kingdom.英国腹腔镜肾盂成形术的国家实践和结果。
J Endourol. 2011 Apr;25(4):657-62. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0505. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
10
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: stented versus stentless.成人腹腔镜肾盂成形术:带支架与无支架。
J Endourol. 2011 Apr;25(4):645-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0401. Epub 2011 Mar 7.

微创肾盂成形术后短双J输尿管支架留置时间安全有效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的长期结果

A Short Double-J Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time Is Safe and Effective Following Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty: Long-term Results from a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Birkhäuser Frédéric D, Rütte Thomas von, Moltzahn Felix, Huber Philipp, Zehnder Pascal

机构信息

Urology St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Feb 21;74:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.014. eCollection 2025 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.014
PMID:40066188
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11891597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

During laparoscopic pyeloplasty, double-J ureteral stents are routinely placed to protect the anastomosis from urinary leakage. However, no consensus exists on the optimal double-J ureteral stent indwelling time. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a short compared to a long double-J ureteral stent indwelling time on long-term functional outcomes ans complications following minimally invasive pyeloplasty.

METHODS

A prospective randomized single-surgeon series compared 2- versus 6-wk indwelling time. Renal scintigraphy was performed preoperatively, and at 6 and 24 mo postoperatively. Diuretic renography was performed 3 mo postoperatively. From year 2 to 5, patients were followed mainly with interviews.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The median follow-up was 66 (range 29-104) mo. Preoperatively, all 82 patients were symptomatic and renal scintigraphy revealed an obstruction. Diuretic renography documented regular morphology and kinetics in all patients at 3 mo. Six months postoperatively, renal scintigraphy detected unobstructed drainage in 84% of patients in group A (2 wk) and in 95% of patients in group B (6 wk;  = 0.237). At 2 yr, the rate of unobstructed drainage increased to 97% in group A and 96% in group B ( = 0.962). In patients with scintigraphically delayed tracer transportation, additional diuretic renography proved regular morphology and contrast media kinetics. No stent-related complications and urinary leakage were observed. All patients were asymptomatic at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our long-term data demonstrate that 2 wk of double-J ureteral stenting following pyeloplasty provides similar functional outcome to 6 wk of stenting. Furthermore, no stent-related complications occurred. This finding may safely be applied to all pyeloplasty patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Without comprising overall functional success or increasing the rate of complications, patients following minimally invasive pyeloplasty benefit from a short double-J stent indwelling time.

摘要

背景与目的

在腹腔镜肾盂成形术中,常规放置双J输尿管支架以防止吻合口漏尿。然而,对于双J输尿管支架的最佳留置时间尚无共识。本研究旨在评估与长留置时间相比,短双J输尿管支架留置时间对微创肾盂成形术后长期功能结局和并发症的影响。

方法

一项前瞻性随机单术者系列研究比较了2周与6周的留置时间。术前、术后6个月和24个月进行肾闪烁显像。术后3个月进行利尿肾图检查。从第2年到第5年,主要通过访谈对患者进行随访。

主要发现与局限性

中位随访时间为66(范围29 - 104)个月。术前,所有82例患者均有症状,肾闪烁显像显示梗阻。利尿肾图显示所有患者在术后3个月时形态和动力学正常。术后6个月,肾闪烁显像显示A组(2周)84%的患者和B组(6周)95%的患者引流通畅(P = 0.237)。在2年时,A组引流通畅率增至97%,B组为96%(P = 0.962)。对于肾闪烁显像示示踪剂转运延迟的患者,额外的利尿肾图显示形态和造影剂动力学正常。未观察到与支架相关的并发症和尿漏。在最后一次随访时所有患者均无症状。

结论及临床意义

我们的长期数据表明,肾盂成形术后双J输尿管支架留置2周与留置6周的功能结局相似。此外,未发生与支架相关的并发症。这一发现可安全地应用于所有肾盂成形术患者。

患者总结

在不影响总体功能成功率或增加并发症发生率的情况下,微创肾盂成形术患者受益于短双J支架留置时间。