Suppr超能文献

儿童血糖自我监测的频率与准确性:与血糖控制的关系

Frequency and accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in children: relationship to glycemic control.

作者信息

Wing R R, Lamparski D M, Zaslow S, Betschart J, Siminerio L, Becker D

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1985 May-Jun;8(3):214-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.3.214.

Abstract

We evaluated the long-term effects of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control in a large unselected group of insulin-dependent diabetic (IDD) children and adolescents (N = 282) treated at a diabetes clinic. Among those who had been taught SMBG techniques (N = 229) and reported frequency of use (N = 209), only 26% reported monitoring three or more times per day. HbA1 levels of patients who monitored their blood most frequently did not differ from those who monitored blood less frequently or those who monitored only urine. Likewise, HbA1 levels of patients who monitored with machines did not differ from Chemstrip bG users. Accuracy was assessed in a subsample of 100 randomly selected Chemstrip bG users by comparing their Chemstrip reading with a laboratory value. Fifty-eight percent of the readings were within 20% of the laboratory value. Accuracy did not relate to frequency of monitoring or to HbA1 levels. These data suggest that frequency and accuracy of SMBG are independent and that neither ensures good glycemic control.

摘要

我们评估了血糖自我监测(SMBG)对一家糖尿病诊所治疗的大量未经过筛选的胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(IDD)儿童及青少年(N = 282)血糖控制的长期影响。在那些已学会SMBG技术的患者中(N = 229)并报告了使用频率的患者中(N = 209),只有26%的患者报告每天监测三次或更多次。血糖监测最频繁的患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)水平与监测较不频繁的患者或仅监测尿糖的患者并无差异。同样,使用血糖仪监测的患者的HbA1水平与使用Chemstrip bG试纸条的患者也没有差异。通过将100名随机选择的Chemstrip bG试纸条使用者的试纸条读数与实验室值进行比较,在一个子样本中评估了准确性。58%的读数在实验室值的20%范围内。准确性与监测频率或HbA1水平无关。这些数据表明,SMBG的频率和准确性是相互独立的,且两者均不能确保良好的血糖控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验