一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈试点研究。
A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes.
作者信息
Channon S, Smith V J, Gregory J W
机构信息
Department of Child Psychology, University Hospital of Wales, UK.
出版信息
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Aug;88(8):680-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.8.680.
Abstract
AIMS
To obtain preliminary data on the impact of motivational interviewing, a counselling approach to behaviour change, on glycaemic control, wellbeing, and self-care of adolescents with diabetes.
METHODS
Twenty two patients aged 14-18 years participated in motivational interviewing sessions during a six month intervention. The effects of the intervention on HbA1c and a range of psychological factors were assessed.
RESULTS
Mean HbA1c decreased from 10.8% to 9.7% during the study and remained significantly lower after the end of the study. Fear of hypoglycaemia was reduced and diabetes was perceived as easier to live with. There were no other significant changes in the psychological measures. By contrast no reduction in HbA1c values was observed in a comparison group who did not receive the motivational interviewing intervention.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this pilot study indicate that motivational interviewing may be a useful intervention in helping adolescents improve their glycaemic control. A larger, longer term randomised controlled study is indicated to clarify the mechanisms and extent of these benefits.
摘要
目的
获取关于动机性访谈（一种行为改变的咨询方法）对糖尿病青少年的血糖控制、健康状况和自我护理影响的初步数据。
方法
22名年龄在14 - 18岁的患者在为期六个月的干预期间参加了动机性访谈课程。评估了干预对糖化血红蛋白（HbA1c）和一系列心理因素的影响。
结果
在研究期间，平均糖化血红蛋白从10.8%降至9.7%，并且在研究结束后仍显著降低。低血糖恐惧减少，且认为糖尿病更易于应对。心理测量指标没有其他显著变化。相比之下，未接受动机性访谈干预的对照组中糖化血红蛋白值没有降低。
结论
这项初步研究的结果表明，动机性访谈可能是帮助青少年改善血糖控制的一种有用干预措施。需要进行更大规模、更长期的随机对照研究以阐明这些益处的机制和程度。
相似文献
1
A pilot study of motivational interviewing in adolescents with diabetes.一项针对青少年糖尿病患者的动机性访谈试点研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2003 Aug;88(8):680-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.8.680.
2
A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy and motivational interviewing for people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus with persistent sub-optimal glycaemic control: a Diabetes and Psychological Therapies (ADaPT) study.一项针对血糖控制持续不佳的 1 型糖尿病患者的认知行为疗法和动机访谈的随机对照试验：一项糖尿病和心理治疗（ADaPT）研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(22):1-101, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14220.
3
Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a pilot study.以动机/解决方案为导向的干预措施可改善1型糖尿病青少年的糖化血红蛋白水平：一项试点研究。
Diabet Med. 2003 Sep;20(9):739-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00995.x.
4
Themes elicited during motivational interviewing to improve glycaemic control in adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.动机性访谈以改善 1 型糖尿病成人血糖控制的主题。
Diabet Med. 2012 Jan;29(1):148-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03384.x.
5
Motivational Interviewing and Self-Care in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Study Protocol.动机性访谈联合自我护理在 1 型糖尿病患者中的应用：一项随机对照临床试验研究方案。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Dec 10;11:574312. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574312. eCollection 2020.
6
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果：系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
7
The effect of motivational interviewing on glycaemic control and perceived competence of diabetes self-management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus after attending a group education programme: a randomised controlled trial.参加团体教育计划后，动机性访谈对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和自我管理能力的影响：一项随机对照试验。
Diabetologia. 2011 Jul;54(7):1620-9. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2120-x. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
8
Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.动机性访谈对血糖控制不佳的青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的影响：一项随机对照初步试验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 12;12:639507. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507. eCollection 2021.
9
Guided self-determination-young versus standard care in the treatment of young females with type 1 diabetes: study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.引导式自主抉择——1型糖尿病年轻女性患者治疗中青少年组与标准治疗组的对比：一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Nov 24;18(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2296-6.
10
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变：一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
引用本文的文献
1
Skeletal health in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: results from a randomized controlled trial.1型糖尿病控制不佳的青少年的骨骼健康：一项随机对照试验的结果
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2025 Sep 14;13(5):e005134. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005134.
2
Frontiers Review: Severe Asthma in Adolescents.前沿综述：青少年重度哮喘
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 7;10:930196. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.930196. eCollection 2022.
3
Transition to adult services: the current and potential role of the UK hospital pharmacist.过渡至成人医疗服务：英国医院药剂师的当前和潜在作用。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Mar;30(e1):e70-e75. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003254. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Motivational Interviewing and Glycemic Control in Adolescents With Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.动机性访谈对血糖控制不佳的青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的影响：一项随机对照初步试验。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 12;12:639507. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.639507. eCollection 2021.
5
Motivational Interview to improve vascular health in Adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 Diabetes (MIAD): a randomized controlled trial.动机性访谈改善 1 型糖尿病控制不佳青少年血管健康的研究（MIAD）：一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001216.
6
Continuous glucose monitoring reduces pubertal hyperglycemia of type 1 diabetes.连续血糖监测可降低 1 型糖尿病青春期高血糖。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jul 28;33(7):865-872. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2020-0057.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果：系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
Impact of Motivational Interviewing on Self-Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.动机性访谈对2型糖尿病患者自我管理的影响：一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Mar 31;9(3):e15709. doi: 10.2196/15709.
9
An integrated intervention for chronic care management in rural Nepal: protocol of a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.尼泊尔农村慢性护理管理综合干预：2 型混合有效性实施研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jan 29;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4063-3.
10
Intrinsic Motivation in Ethnic Minority Youth with Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病少数民族青少年的内在动机
Child Health Care. 2017;46(3):215-229. doi: 10.1080/02739615.2015.1124777. Epub 2016 May 13.
本文引用的文献
1
Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to a behavioral weight-control program for older obese women with NIDDM. A pilot study.动机性访谈对改善患有非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病的老年肥胖女性坚持行为体重控制计划的效果：一项试点研究。
Diabetes Care. 1997 Jan;20(1):52-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.1.52.
2
Professional responses to innovation in clinical method: diabetes care and negotiating skills.对临床方法创新的专业应对：糖尿病护理与沟通技巧
Patient Educ Couns. 1996 Oct;29(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(96)00935-4.
3
Motivational interviewing: research, practice, and puzzles.动机性访谈：研究、实践与谜题
Addict Behav. 1996 Nov-Dec;21(6):835-42. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(96)00044-5.
4
Reliability and validity of the Diabetes Family Behavior Scale (DFBS).糖尿病家庭行为量表（DFBS）的信度和效度
Diabetes Educ. 1993 Mar-Apr;19(2):125-32. doi: 10.1177/014572179301900206.
5
Development of the diabetes knowledge (DKN) scales: forms DKNA, DKNB, and DKNC.糖尿病知识（DKN）量表的开发：DKNA、DKNB和DKNC表格。
Diabetes Care. 1984 Jan-Feb;7(1):36-41. doi: 10.2337/diacare.7.1.36.
6
Frequency and accuracy of self-monitoring of blood glucose in children: relationship to glycemic control.儿童血糖自我监测的频率与准确性：与血糖控制的关系
Diabetes Care. 1985 May-Jun;8(3):214-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.8.3.214.
7
Psychosocial aspects of diabetes in childhood and adolescence.儿童和青少年糖尿病的社会心理因素
Pediatr Ann. 1987 Sep;16(9):728-33, 736-40. doi: 10.3928/0090-4481-19870901-09.
8
Impaired insulin action in puberty. A contributing factor to poor glycemic control in adolescents with diabetes.青春期胰岛素作用受损。这是糖尿病青少年血糖控制不佳的一个促成因素。
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jul 24;315(4):215-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198607243150402.
9
Personal models of diabetes and their relations to self-care activities.糖尿病的个人模式及其与自我护理活动的关系。
Health Psychol. 1990;9(5):632-46. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.9.5.632.
Zotero 插件