Vale Pires Cristiana, Curado Adriana, Fuertes Ricardo, Carvalho Maria Carmo, Valente Helena
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Education and Psychology, CEDH - Research Centre for Human Development, Porto, Portugal.
Kosmicare, Porto, Portugal.
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Mar 12;22(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01179-y.
The COVID-19 pandemic health crisis and its potential implications for people who use drugs (PWUD) created permissive conditions toward social innovation and experimentation. Still, it also exposed gaps in harm reduction approaches. Harm reduction responsiveness was informed by the priorities defined at the local level, so it was not applied uniformly in different regions. This paper intends to contribute to the analysis of harm reduction responsiveness during the COVID-19 outbreak by comparing the adaptations and implementation of harm reduction and municipal services to support street-involved (SI) PWUD in two Portuguese cities- Porto and Lisbon. This study aims to shed light on the city-level implementation of drug policies in Portugal.
This study is based on a comparative qualitative analysis based on the experiences of PWUD and Harm Reduction (HR) professionals regarding the implementation of harm reduction responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Porto and Lisbon. The study is based on interviews with SI PWUD (n = 22, 12 in Porto and 10 in Lisbon) and online focus groups with harm reduction professionals (N = 12, 6 in Porto and 6 in Lisbon).
Harm reduction teams in Porto and Lisbon implemented contingency plans and proactive adaptations to respond to the pandemic-related emerging needs. However, the study revealed contrasting experiences in the city-level support to harm reduction and responsiveness to the impacts of COVID-19 among SI PWUD in Porto and Lisbon. There were relevant differences in the support they received from the City Council and the city-level responses implemented to support SI PWUD. While the approach in Porto was described as restrictive and zero-tolerance towards drug use, Lisbon´s strategy was harm reduction-focused and inclusive. The study participants revealed better results in Lisbon regarding the harm reduction responsiveness to the pandemic health crisis and the accessibility and adherence of SI PWUD to services.
The pandemic constraints and adaptations must be contextualized in the ongoing city-level debates regarding drug policies and harm reduction in Portugal. Moreover, city-level drug policies and local support are crucial to map the opportunities and challenges of implementing the Portuguese Drug Decriminalization Model in different contexts.
新冠疫情引发的健康危机及其对吸毒者可能产生的影响,为社会创新和试验创造了宽松条件。然而,这也暴露了减少伤害方法中存在的差距。减少伤害措施的响应是根据地方层面确定的优先事项制定的,因此在不同地区并未得到统一应用。本文旨在通过比较葡萄牙两个城市——波尔图和里斯本为支持街头吸毒者而采取的减少伤害措施及市政服务的调整与实施情况,来分析新冠疫情期间减少伤害措施的响应情况。本研究旨在阐明葡萄牙城市层面毒品政策的实施情况。
本研究基于一项比较性定性分析,该分析基于吸毒者和减少伤害专业人员在新冠疫情期间于波尔图和里斯本实施减少伤害措施的经验。该研究基于对街头吸毒者的访谈(n = 22,波尔图12人,里斯本10人)以及与减少伤害专业人员的在线焦点小组访谈(N = 12,波尔图6人,里斯本6人)。
波尔图和里斯本的减少伤害团队实施了应急计划并积极进行调整,以应对与疫情相关的新出现的需求。然而,该研究揭示了在城市层面支持减少伤害以及对波尔图和里斯本的街头吸毒者应对新冠疫情影响方面存在截然不同的经历。他们从市议会获得的支持以及为支持街头吸毒者而实施的城市层面应对措施存在显著差异。虽然波尔图的做法被描述为对吸毒采取限制和零容忍态度,但里斯本的策略是以减少伤害为重点且具有包容性。研究参与者表示,在减少伤害对疫情健康危机的响应以及街头吸毒者获得服务的可及性和对服务的依从性方面,里斯本取得了更好的成果。
疫情带来的限制和调整必须结合葡萄牙正在进行的关于城市层面毒品政策和减少伤害的辩论来考量。此外,城市层面的毒品政策和地方支持对于明确在不同背景下实施葡萄牙毒品非刑事化模式的机遇和挑战至关重要。