Suppr超能文献

使用变色粘合剂将陶瓷和金属托槽粘结到牙釉质上的剪切粘结强度。

Shear bond strength of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to enamel using color-change adhesive.

作者信息

Delavarian Mohadeseh, Rahimi Farshad, Mohammadi Ramin, Imani Mohammad Moslem

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):233-238.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to the enamel using Grengloo color-change adhesive and Transbond XT conventional composite.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this , experimental study, 120 extracted human premolars were divided into four groups: (1) Grengloo with metal brackets, (2) Grengloo with ceramic brackets, (3) Transbond XT with metal brackets, and (4) Transbond XT with ceramic brackets. After bracket bonding, the teeth were subjected to 500 thermal cycles and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The SBS was measured and the data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) scores. was statistically significant ( < 0.001).

RESULTS

The effect of type of bracket (metal/ceramic) on SBS was not statistically significant ( = 0.368). However, the effect of type of composite on SBS was statistically significant ( < 0.001) and the SBS of Grengloo was higher than that of Transbond XT. No significant difference was found in ARI scores among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Regarding the high SBS and the safe region of bond failure in Grengloo composite, this color-change adhesive can be a suitable alternative in cases that require high bond strength. Furthermore, the color contrast of Grengloo can make composite removal easier than Transbond XT with color match of composite and teeth.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较使用Grengloo变色粘合剂和Transbond XT传统复合材料将陶瓷和金属托槽粘结到牙釉质上的剪切粘结强度(SBS)。

材料与方法

在本实验研究中,120颗拔除的人类前磨牙被分为四组:(1)金属托槽搭配Grengloo,(2)陶瓷托槽搭配Grengloo,(3)金属托槽搭配Transbond XT,以及(4)陶瓷托槽搭配Transbond XT。托槽粘结后,牙齿经历500次热循环,并在37°C下孵育24小时。测量SBS并使用双向方差分析对数据进行分析。使用曼-惠特尼U检验比较粘结剂残留指数(ARI)得分。差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。

结果

托槽类型(金属/陶瓷)对SBS的影响无统计学意义(P = 0.368)。然而,复合材料类型对SBS的影响具有统计学意义(P<0.001),且Grengloo的SBS高于Transbond XT。各组之间的ARI得分无显著差异。

结论

鉴于Grengloo复合材料具有较高的SBS以及粘结失败的安全区域,这种变色粘合剂在需要高粘结强度的情况下可以是一种合适的替代品。此外,Grengloo的颜色对比使得复合材料去除比与牙齿颜色匹配的Transbond XT更容易。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d048/6596176/aadafc8f3554/DRJ-16-233-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验