Suppr超能文献

用于评估围手术期疼痛管理有效性和疗效的测量工具核心结局集:国际IMI-PainCare PROMPT德尔菲共识过程的结果

A core outcome set of measurement instruments for assessing effectiveness and efficacy of perioperative pain management: results of the international IMI-PainCare PROMPT Delphi consensus process.

作者信息

Pogatzki-Zahn Esther M, De Lucia Sarah, Weinmann Claudia, Heitkamp Hauke, Hummelshoj Lone, Liedgens Hiltrud, Meissner Winfried, Vincent Katy, Vollert Jan, Zahn Peter, Kaiser Ulrike, Rosenberger Daniela C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2025 May;134(5):1460-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.01.029. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective perioperative pain management is crucial to prevent patient suffering, delayed recovery, chronic postsurgical pain, and long-term opioid use. However, the heterogeneous use of outcomes in studies complicates evidence synthesis and might not accurately reflect the experiences of individual patients. We initiated a consensus process to establish a core outcome set (COS) of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in postoperative pain, building upon the earlier consensus on a COS of domains.

METHODS

Potential PROMs were identified via systematic literature searches for the domains pain intensity (with subdomains at rest and during activity), physical function, self-efficacy, and adverse events, followed by appraisal of psychometric properties according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology. Then, a consensus meeting was convened, followed by a Delphi process with an international, multiprofessional panel of stakeholders, including those with lived experience. A conclusive consensus meeting approved the final COS of PROMs.

RESULTS

The final COS consists of one unidimensional numerical rating scale for assessing pain intensity on average, worst pain intensity, pain intensity at rest, and procedure-specific pain intensity during activity; one unidimensional scale for pain interfering with activities in bed; one procedure-specific scale for assessing physical function; the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale for assessing self-efficacy; and the IMI-PainCare PROMPT adaptation of the Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale for assessing adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive use of a core outcome set will help harmonise outcome assessment, facilitate comparisons between studies, promote patient-centred research, and improve postoperative pain care.

摘要

背景

有效的围手术期疼痛管理对于防止患者痛苦、延迟恢复、慢性术后疼痛和长期使用阿片类药物至关重要。然而,研究中结果的异质性使用使证据综合变得复杂,可能无法准确反映个体患者的经历。我们启动了一个共识过程,以建立术后疼痛患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的核心结局集(COS),该过程基于早期在领域COS上达成的共识。

方法

通过系统的文献检索确定潜在的PROMs,检索范围涵盖疼痛强度(包括静息和活动时的子领域)、身体功能、自我效能和不良事件等领域,随后根据基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准方法对心理测量特性进行评估。然后召开了一次共识会议,接着进行了德尔菲法,参与的国际多专业利益相关者小组包括有实际经验的人员。最后一次决定性的共识会议批准了PROMs的最终COS。

结果

最终的COS包括一个用于评估平均疼痛强度、最严重疼痛强度、静息时疼痛强度以及活动期间特定手术疼痛强度的单维数字评定量表;一个用于评估疼痛对床上活动干扰的单维量表;一个用于评估身体功能的特定手术量表;关节炎自我效能量表的IMI - PainCare PROMPT改编版用于评估自我效能;以及阿片类药物相关症状困扰量表的IMI - PainCare PROMPT改编版用于评估不良事件。

结论

综合使用核心结局集将有助于统一结局评估,便于研究间的比较,促进以患者为中心的研究,并改善术后疼痛护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ac/12106875/6d0cc6eb6b1e/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验