Córdova Manuel, Torres Ricardo da Silva, Helmond Aloysius van, Kootstra Gert
Agricultural Biosystems Engineering Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Artificial Intelligence Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 4;25(5):1570. doi: 10.3390/s25051570.
To support the sustainable use of marine resources, regulations have been proposed to reduce fish discards focusing on the registration of all listed species. To comply with such regulations, computer vision methods have been developed. Nevertheless, current approaches are constrained by their closed-set nature, where they are designed only to recognize fish species that were present during training. In the real world, however, samples of unknown fish species may appear in different fishing regions or seasons, requiring fish classification to be treated as an open-set problem. This work focuses on the assessment of open-set recognition to automate the registration process of fish. The state-of-the-art Multiple Gaussian Prototype Learning (MGPL) was compared with the simple yet powerful Open-Set Nearest Neighbor (OSNN) and the Probability of Inclusion Support Vector Machine (PISVM). For the experiments, the Fish Detection and Weight Estimation dataset, containing images of 2216 fish instances from nine species, was used. Experimental results demonstrated that OSNN and PISVM outperformed MGPL in both recognizing known and unknown species. OSNN achieved the best results when classifying samples as either one of the known species or as an unknown species with an F1-macro of 0.79±0.05 and an AUROC score of 0.92±0.01 surpassing PISVM by 0.05 and 0.03, respectively.
为支持海洋资源的可持续利用,已提出相关规定以减少鱼类丢弃量,重点是对所有列入清单的物种进行登记。为遵守此类规定,已开发出计算机视觉方法。然而,当前方法受其封闭集性质的限制,即它们仅设计用于识别训练期间出现的鱼类物种。然而,在现实世界中,未知鱼类物种的样本可能出现在不同的捕捞区域或季节,这就要求鱼类分类被视为一个开放集问题。这项工作专注于评估开放集识别,以实现鱼类登记过程的自动化。将最先进的多高斯原型学习(MGPL)与简单但强大的开放集最近邻(OSNN)和包含支持向量机(PISVM)进行了比较。在实验中,使用了鱼类检测和重量估计数据集,该数据集包含来自九个物种的2216条鱼实例的图像。实验结果表明,在识别已知和未知物种方面,OSNN和PISVM均优于MGPL。当将样本分类为已知物种之一或未知物种时,OSNN取得了最佳结果,其F1宏值为0.79±0.05,AUROC得分为0.92±0.01,分别比PISVM高出0.05和0.03。