• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Reliability and validity studies of the comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS).

作者信息

Perris C

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Umeå University, Sweden.

出版信息

Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1979;3(4):413-21. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(79)90056-0.

DOI:10.1016/0364-7722(79)90056-0
PMID:400997
Abstract
  1. The most important properties of a rating instrument aimed at detecting possible changes in psychopathology are as follows: a) communicability to not yet experienced raters; b) satisfactory levels of reliability and validity; and c) sensitivity to changes. Since its construction some years ago these properties of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) have been investigated in several sessions, both experimental, and in the course of clinical drug trials. 2. Raters with a different training background (physicians, psychologists, social workers, nurses), and a different level of experience in ratings have participated in the sessions. 3. In all instances the CPRS has proved to be highly reliable and highly sensitive. It appeared to be easily communicable, also in its international versions, and its content seems to fit very well with different cultural contexts. Information about its validity has been inferred from the studies mentioned above, and, also from correlations with other well known rating instruments.
摘要

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity studies of the comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS).
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1979;3(4):413-21. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(79)90056-0.
2
Construction of a new psychiatric rating instrument, the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS).一种新的精神病学评定工具——综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)的构建。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1979;3(4):405-12. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(79)90055-9.
3
Interprofessional communicability and reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) as assessed by video-taped interviews.通过录像访谈评估综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)的跨专业可沟通性和可靠性。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1979 Aug;60(2):144-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1979.tb03581.x.
4
Comparison between Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) and association for methodology and documentation in psychiatry (AMP) system.综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS)与精神病学方法与文献协会(AMP)系统的比较。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol. 1979;3(4):423-7. doi: 10.1016/0364-7722(79)90057-2.
5
Inter-rater reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale in Japan.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1985 Apr;71(4):388-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02538.x.
6
The comprehensive psychopathological rating scale (CPRS): communicability to, and inter-rater reliability among untrained raters.综合精神病理学评定量表(CPRS):在未经培训的评定者中的可交流性及评定者间信度。
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978(271):63-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1978.tb02363.x.
7
The applicability and the inter-rater reliability of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale in an elderly clinical population.综合精神病理学评定量表在老年临床人群中的适用性及评定者间信度
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;20(1):35-40. doi: 10.1002/gps.1244.
8
Psychopathological Functioning Levels (PFLs) and their possible relevance in psychiatric treatments: a qualitative research project.精神病理功能水平(PFLs)及其在精神科治疗中的潜在相关性:一项定性研究项目。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 20;16:253. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0940-4.
9
The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule for Adult with Developmental Disability (PAS-ADD) Checklist: reliability and validity of French version.成人发育障碍患者精神科评估量表(PAS - ADD)检查表:法语版的信度和效度
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Aug;57(8):758-65. doi: 10.1111/jir.12028. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
10
The interrater reliability of a Dutch version of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale.荷兰版《综合精神病理学评定量表》的评分者间信度。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Mar;83(3):202-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb05525.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune modulation with a staphylococcal preparation in fibromyalgia/chronic fatigue syndrome: relation between antibody levels and clinical improvement.用葡萄球菌制剂对纤维肌痛/慢性疲劳综合征进行免疫调节:抗体水平与临床改善之间的关系
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;23(2):98-105. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-1062-8. Epub 2004 Jan 20.