Boshra Amira Yahia, Aseeri Fatima Ahmad, Alasiry Sharifa, Ahmad Mehrunnisha, Chahal Aksh, Nambi Gopal, Shaphe Mohammad Abu, Sidiq Mohammad, Sharma Abhishek, Kashoo Faizan
College of Nursing, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.
Security Forces Hospital Program, Saudi Arabia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Mar 14;104(11):e41670. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041670.
This cross-sectional study investigates the relationship between nursing leadership styles and patient satisfaction in 4 public hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The nonrandom convenience sampling method was used with 150 nurses who were involved in caring for 180 patients from 4 different hospitals in the central region of Saudi Arabia. Nursing leadership styles were assessed from nurses using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, while patient satisfaction was measured using the Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire. Passive-avoidant (PA) leadership style was most prevalent among nurse managers (62.6%, n = 94) and was associated with the lowest patient satisfaction (m = 1.7, SD = 0.1), with ratings ranging from 0 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a statistically significant difference in patient satisfaction scores among leadership styles (F (3, 176) = 25.421, P < .001). The transactional leadership demonstrated higher mean scores (m = 2.7) compared to both the PA leadership style (m = 2.1) (MD = 0.60, SE = 0.071, P < .001, 95% CI [0.42, 0.79]) and the transformational leadership leadership style (m = 2.2) (MD = 0.54, SE = 0.10, P = .004, 95% CI [0.21, 0.88]). Conversely, the PA leadership style had lower mean scores (m = 2.1) than both the transactional leadership group (MD = 0.60, SE = 0.07, P < .001, 95% CI [0.42, 0.79]) and the outcome leadership style (m = 2.5) (MD = 0.37, SE = 0.09, P = .008, 95% CI [0.09, 0.65]). In Saudi Arabian public hospitals, PA leadership style was found to be the most prevalent among nurse managers, associated with the lowest levels of patient satisfaction. These findings underscore the importance of nursing leadership styles in affecting patient satisfaction. Further research is needed to explore the specific strategies that can be employed to foster effective leadership styles for improved patient outcomes.
这项横断面研究调查了沙特阿拉伯4家公立医院护理领导风格与患者满意度之间的关系。采用非随机便利抽样方法,选取了150名护士,这些护士负责护理沙特阿拉伯中部地区4家不同医院的180名患者。使用多因素领导问卷对护士的护理领导风格进行评估,同时使用护理服务质量患者满意度问卷来衡量患者满意度。消极回避(PA)领导风格在护士长中最为普遍(62.6%,n = 94),且与最低的患者满意度相关(m = 1.7,标准差 = 0.1),评分范围为0(低满意度)至4(高满意度)。方差分析(ANOVA)显示,不同领导风格的患者满意度得分存在统计学显著差异(F(3, 176) = 25.421,P <.001)。与PA领导风格(m = 2.1)(平均差 = 0.60,标准误 = 0.071,P <.001,95%置信区间[0.42, 0.79])和变革型领导风格(m = 2.2)(平均差 = 0.54,标准误 = 0.10,P =.004,95%置信区间[0.21, 0.88])相比,交易型领导的平均得分更高(m = 2.7)。相反,PA领导风格的平均得分(m = 2.1)低于交易型领导组(平均差 = 0.60,标准误 = 0.07,P <.001,95%置信区间[0.42, 0.79])和成果领导风格(m = 2.5)(平均差 = 0.37,标准误 = 0.09,P =.008,95%置信区间[0.09, 0.65])。在沙特阿拉伯的公立医院中,发现PA领导风格在护士长中最为普遍,且与最低水平的患者满意度相关。这些发现强调了护理领导风格对患者满意度的重要性。需要进一步研究以探索可采用的具体策略,以培养有效的领导风格,改善患者结局。