• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践洞察:一项关于心力衰竭患者液体摄入管理的全国性调查。

Insights into clinical practice: A national survey on fluid intake management in heart failure.

作者信息

Höög Linn, Strömberg Anna, Waldréus Nana, Nymark Carolin

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Heart and Vascular Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2769-2779. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15273. Epub 2025 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.15273
PMID:40101704
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12287847/
Abstract

AIMS

Due to insufficient evidence and a lack of cohesive guidelines, the management and use of fluid restriction in patients with heart failure (HF) may vary among healthcare professionals. However, the extent of this variation is unknown. The aim of this study was to describe physicians' and registered nurses' (RN) clinical practice regarding fluid intake and fluid restriction in adult patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Physicians and RNs treating patients with HF at 75 hospitals across all healthcare regions in Sweden were invited to answer a web-based survey regarding management on fluid intake and fluid restriction. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and chi-square test. A total of 646 physicians and RNs across 45 hospitals in Sweden completed the survey. Significant differences in recommendations and management were found in relation to professional role, care setting and work experience. Overall, 93.8% recommend fluid restriction for all or some patients with HF. RNs recommend fluid restriction for all patients with HF to a significantly higher extent compared with physicians (34.5% vs. 14.9%; P < 0.001). Additionally, 49.2% believe that fluid restriction is an effective treatment strategy to prevent congestion, and 29.3% recommend fluid restriction routinely. One-third lacked knowledge of existing local guidelines regarding fluid restriction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there are differences in clinical practice regarding healthcare professionals' recommendations on fluid intake and fluid restriction. These differences may result in patients with HF receiving varied and inconsistent care. Recommendations were primarily based on each healthcare professional's individual opinion rather than on evidence and guidelines.

摘要

目的

由于证据不足且缺乏统一的指南,心力衰竭(HF)患者液体限制的管理和应用在医疗专业人员中可能存在差异。然而,这种差异的程度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是描述医生和注册护士(RN)在成年HF患者液体摄入和液体限制方面的临床实践。

方法与结果

邀请瑞典所有医疗区域75家医院治疗HF患者的医生和RN回答关于液体摄入和液体限制管理的网络调查问卷。数据采用描述性统计和卡方检验进行分析。瑞典45家医院的646名医生和RN完成了调查。在推荐和管理方面,发现与专业角色、护理环境和工作经验有关的显著差异。总体而言,93.8%的人建议对所有或部分HF患者进行液体限制。与医生相比,RN建议对所有HF患者进行液体限制的比例显著更高(34.5%对14.9%;P<0.001)。此外,49.2%的人认为液体限制是预防充血的有效治疗策略,29.3%的人常规推荐液体限制。三分之一的人对现有的关于液体限制的当地指南缺乏了解。

结论

本研究表明,医疗专业人员在液体摄入和液体限制建议方面的临床实践存在差异。这些差异可能导致HF患者接受不同且不一致的护理。建议主要基于每个医疗专业人员的个人意见,而非证据和指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/de74de8efa14/EHF2-12-2769-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/4fc699886f1f/EHF2-12-2769-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/1d41f149a34a/EHF2-12-2769-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/d4bfdf0d90d9/EHF2-12-2769-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/e940ed6fb7cf/EHF2-12-2769-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/de74de8efa14/EHF2-12-2769-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/4fc699886f1f/EHF2-12-2769-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/1d41f149a34a/EHF2-12-2769-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/d4bfdf0d90d9/EHF2-12-2769-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/e940ed6fb7cf/EHF2-12-2769-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d55/12287847/de74de8efa14/EHF2-12-2769-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Insights into clinical practice: A national survey on fluid intake management in heart failure.临床实践洞察:一项关于心力衰竭患者液体摄入管理的全国性调查。
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Aug;12(4):2769-2779. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15273. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
4
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
5
Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.交互式远程医疗:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 7;2015(9):CD002098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002098.pub2.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
10
Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.继续教育会议和研讨会:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD003030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Finerenone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.非奈利酮治疗射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 24;391(16):1475-1485. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2407107. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
2
Dietary sodium and fluid intake in heart failure. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.心力衰竭患者的膳食钠和液体摄入。欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会的临床共识声明。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;26(4):730-741. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3244. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
3
Personalized care of patients with heart failure: are we ready for a REWOLUTION? Insights from two international surveys on healthcare professionals' needs and patients' perceptions.
心力衰竭患者的个体化护理:我们是否准备好迎来一场革命?来自两项国际调查的医疗保健专业人员需求和患者认知的见解。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Mar;25(3):364-372. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2798.
4
Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.达格列净治疗射血分数轻度降低或保留的心力衰竭。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1089-1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
5
What kind of patient education and self-care support do patients with heart failure receive, and by whom? Implementation of the ESC guidelines for heart failure in three European regions.心力衰竭患者接受何种患者教育和自我护理支持,由谁提供?三个欧洲地区心力衰竭 ESC 指南的实施情况。
Heart Lung. 2023 Jan-Feb;57:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.07.013. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
6
Are the recommendation of sodium and fluid restriction in heart failure patients changing over the past years? A systematic review and meta-analysis.心力衰竭患者的钠和液体限制推荐在过去几年中是否发生了变化?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2022年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心力衰竭学会心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2022 May 3;145(18):e895-e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
From guideline to daily practice: Implementation of ESC-guidelines considering multidisciplinary and non-pharmacological care in heart failure in three ESC member states, a case study.从指南到日常实践:在三个欧洲心脏病学会成员国中考虑心力衰竭多学科和非药物治疗的欧洲心脏病学会指南实施情况,一项案例研究
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jan 24;11:20480040221074598. doi: 10.1177/20480040221074598. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.射血分数降低的心力衰竭的药物治疗的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;10(2):73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
10
Things We Do for No Reason™: Fluid Restriction for the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction.
J Hosp Med. 2021 Dec;16(12):754-756. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3639.