• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机器学习的可解释自动非线性计算健康评分系统及围手术期卒中预测应用:回顾性研究

Machine Learning-Based Explainable Automated Nonlinear Computation Scoring System for Health Score and an Application for Prediction of Perioperative Stroke: Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Oh Mi-Young, Kim Hee-Soo, Jung Young Mi, Lee Hyung-Chul, Lee Seung-Bo, Lee Seung Mi

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Sejong General Hospital, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon-si, Republic of Korea.

Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 19;27:e58021. doi: 10.2196/58021.

DOI:10.2196/58021
PMID:40106818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966079/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance performance by capturing nonlinear interactions. However, ML-based models have some limitations in terms of interpretability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop and validate a more comprehensible and efficient ML-based scoring system using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values.

METHODS

We developed and validated the Explainable Automated nonlinear Computation scoring system for Health (EACH) framework score. We developed a CatBoost-based prediction model, identified key features, and automatically detected the top 5 steepest slope change points based on SHAP plots. Subsequently, we developed a scoring system (EACH) and normalized the score. Finally, the EACH score was used to predict perioperative stroke. We developed the EACH score using data from the Seoul National University Hospital cohort and validated it using data from the Boramae Medical Center, which was geographically and temporally different from the development set.

RESULTS

When applied for perioperative stroke prediction among 38,737 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the EACH score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI 0.753-0.892). In the external validation, the EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared with a traditional score (AUC=0.528, 95% CI 0.457-0.619) and another ML-based scoring generator (AUC=0.564, 95% CI 0.516-0.612).

CONCLUSIONS

The EACH score is a more precise, explainable ML-based risk tool, proven effective in real-world data. The EACH score outperformed traditional scoring system and other prediction models based on different ML techniques in predicting perioperative stroke.

摘要

背景

机器学习(ML)有潜力通过捕捉非线性相互作用来提高性能。然而,基于ML的模型在可解释性方面存在一些局限性。

目的

本研究旨在使用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)值开发并验证一个更易理解且高效的基于ML的评分系统。

方法

我们开发并验证了用于健康的可解释自动非线性计算评分系统(EACH)框架分数。我们开发了一个基于CatBoost的预测模型,识别关键特征,并基于SHAP图自动检测出最陡斜率变化点的前5个点。随后,我们开发了一个评分系统(EACH)并对分数进行了标准化。最后,使用EACH分数来预测围手术期卒中。我们使用首尔国立大学医院队列的数据开发了EACH分数,并使用与开发集在地理和时间上不同的博拉梅医疗中心的数据对其进行验证。

结果

在38737例接受非心脏手术的患者中应用于围手术期卒中预测时,EACH分数的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.829(95%CI 0.753 - 0.892)。在外部验证中,与传统分数(AUC = 0.528,95%CI 0.457 - 0.619)和另一个基于ML的评分生成器(AUC = 0.564,95%CI 0.516 - 0.612)相比,EACH分数表现出更好的预测性能,AUC为0.784(95%CI 0.694 - 0.871)。

结论

EACH分数是一种更精确、可解释的基于ML的风险工具,在实际数据中被证明是有效的。在预测围手术期卒中方面,EACH分数优于传统评分系统和基于不同ML技术的其他预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/a094b7eb6ffe/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/f02cca4f050e/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/14059734500f/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/9ff2513e1f8c/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/a094b7eb6ffe/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/f02cca4f050e/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/14059734500f/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/9ff2513e1f8c/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3a6/11966079/a094b7eb6ffe/jmir_v27i1e58021_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning-Based Explainable Automated Nonlinear Computation Scoring System for Health Score and an Application for Prediction of Perioperative Stroke: Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的可解释自动非线性计算健康评分系统及围手术期卒中预测应用:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 19;27:e58021. doi: 10.2196/58021.
2
Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Two Centers in China: Retrospective Study.中国两个中心用于预测非心脏手术后心肌损伤的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jul 26;7:e54872. doi: 10.2196/54872.
3
Developing a Machine Learning Model for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: Retrospective Study.开发用于预测非心脏手术患者30天主要不良心脑血管事件的机器学习模型:回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 9;27:e66366. doi: 10.2196/66366.
4
Prediction for Perioperative Stroke Using Intraoperative Parameters.术中参数预测围手术期卒中。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 20;13(16):e032216. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032216. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
5
Machine learning-based predictive models for perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing noncardiac surgery.基于机器学习的预测模型用于接受非心脏手术的稳定冠状动脉疾病患者围手术期主要不良心血管事件的预测
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2025 Mar;260:108561. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108561. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
6
Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Persistent Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Development and Validation Study.用于预测持续性脓毒症相关急性肾损伤的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 28;27:e62932. doi: 10.2196/62932.
7
A Supervised Explainable Machine Learning Model for Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder in Liver-Transplantation Patients and External Validation on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV Database: Retrospective Study.一种用于肝移植患者围手术期神经认知障碍的监督式可解释机器学习模型及在重症监护医学信息数据库IV上的外部验证:一项回顾性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 15;27:e55046. doi: 10.2196/55046.
8
Tree-based ensemble machine learning models in the prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiac surgery: a multicenter cohort study.基于树的集成机器学习模型在心脏手术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征预测中的应用:一项多中心队列研究。
J Transl Med. 2024 Aug 15;22(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05395-1.
9
Enhancing Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration Prediction by Machine Learning-Based Integration of Novel and Existing, In Silico and Experimental Molecular Parameters from a Standardized Database.通过基于机器学习整合来自标准化数据库的新的和现有的、计算机模拟和实验分子参数来增强血脑屏障穿透预测
J Chem Inf Model. 2025 Mar 24;65(6):2773-2784. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02212. Epub 2025 Mar 4.
10
Machine-learning Models Predict 30-Day Mortality, Cardiovascular Complications, and Respiratory Complications After Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.机器学习模型预测无菌翻修全关节置换术后 30 天死亡率、心血管并发症和呼吸系统并发症。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Nov 1;480(11):2137-2145. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002276. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Embracing the future-is artificial intelligence already better? A comparative study of artificial intelligence performance in diagnostic accuracy and decision-making.拥抱未来——人工智能已经更胜一筹了吗?人工智能在诊断准确性和决策方面的性能比较研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Apr;31(4):e16195. doi: 10.1111/ene.16195. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
2
Prediction models using artificial intelligence and longitudinal data from electronic health records: a systematic methodological review.利用人工智能和电子健康记录的纵向数据进行预测模型:系统的方法学综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):2072-2082. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad168.
3
Artificial intelligence-based methods for fusion of electronic health records and imaging data.
基于人工智能的电子健康记录与医学影像数据融合方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 26;12(1):17981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22514-4.
4
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
AutoScore-Imbalance: An interpretable machine learning tool for development of clinical scores with rare events data.AutoScore-Imbalance:一种具有罕见事件数据的临床评分开发的可解释机器学习工具。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 May;129:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104072. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
A survey on missing data in machine learning.关于机器学习中缺失数据的一项调查。
J Big Data. 2021;8(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
7
Perioperative stroke after non-cardiac, non-neurological surgery.非心脏、非神经外科手术围手术期卒中
BJA Educ. 2021 Feb;21(2):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Role of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Real-Life Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.人工智能应用在实际临床实践中的作用:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 22;23(4):e25759. doi: 10.2196/25759.
9
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
10
AutoScore: A Machine Learning-Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records.自动评分:一种基于机器学习的自动临床评分生成器及其在使用电子健康记录进行死亡率预测中的应用。
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 21;8(10):e21798. doi: 10.2196/21798.