DeFrancisco Justin, Kim Siyong
Medical Physics Program, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Apr;26(4):e70051. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70051. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
FLASH has been shown to spare normal tissue toxicity while maintaining tumor control. However, existing irradiation platforms and dosimetry are not compatible. Consequently, an abundance of FLASH delivery devices and new dosimetry across all modalities has been created. Many review articles concluded that dosimetry is modality-dependent. Focusing on electrons, researchers have modified clinical LINACs to enable FLASH dose rates. Modified LINACs caused the development of unique control systems that have yet to be characterized. Improvement could be made when considering the organization of reviews.
To systematically perform a literature survey on electron FLASH dosimetry and beam control mechanisms with modified LINACs, detail where articles originated, and organize the results.
A literature survey was performed from two websites using specified keywords and sifted results to find articles that fit the criteria. The results were organized in tables and summaries effectively by matching up dosimeters with their measurement goal, referring to their specific models, outlining the irradiation conditions they were tested in, and detailing their calibration procedure. Furthermore, included was the unique topic of control mechanisms.
Twenty-eight matches were found. Various dosimeters were examined to measure absorbed dose, beam characteristics (BC), dose per pulse (DPP), and pulse counting (PC). Specific detectors and the irradiation conditions are organized and presented in a table. Each model's pros and cons are presented in another table for further consideration. A third table is provided to detail beam control methods.
Dosimetry is majorly film-based for absorbed dose and beam characteristic measurements. Many candidates for dosimeters for the use of DPP and PC have been tested, but they have yet to be tested without limitations. Beam control mechanisms primarily consist of unacceptable delivery errors. Many suggestions for improvement were given, mainly consisting of finding new dosimeters and modulating the dose DPP.
FLASH放疗已被证明在维持肿瘤控制的同时可减少正常组织毒性。然而,现有的照射平台和剂量测定法不兼容。因此,已经开发了大量的FLASH输送设备和适用于所有模式的新剂量测定法。许多综述文章得出结论,剂量测定法依赖于模式。专注于电子放疗,研究人员对临床直线加速器进行了改进,以实现FLASH剂量率。改进后的直线加速器催生了尚未得到充分表征的独特控制系统。在考虑综述的组织方式时可以进行改进。
系统地对使用改进直线加速器的电子FLASH剂量测定法和束流控制机制进行文献调查,详细说明文章的来源,并整理结果。
使用指定关键词在两个网站上进行文献调查,并筛选结果以找到符合标准的文章。通过将剂量计与其测量目标相匹配、参考其特定型号、概述其测试的照射条件并详细说明其校准程序,有效地将结果整理成表格和总结。此外,还包括控制机制这一独特主题。
共找到28篇匹配文章。研究了各种剂量计以测量吸收剂量、束流特性(BC)、每脉冲剂量(DPP)和脉冲计数(PC)。特定探测器和照射条件在一个表格中进行了整理和展示。每个型号的优缺点在另一个表格中列出以供进一步参考。第三个表格详细说明了束流控制方法。
在吸收剂量和束流特性测量方面,剂量测定主要基于胶片。许多用于DPP和PC测量的剂量计候选产品已经过测试,但它们仍存在局限性。束流控制机制主要存在不可接受的输送误差。提出了许多改进建议,主要包括寻找新的剂量计和调节剂量DPP。