Zhao Mengting, Law Andrew, Su Chang, Jennings Sion, Bourgon Alain, Jia Wenjun, Larose Marie-Hélène, Bowness David, Zeng Yong
Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering, Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Flight Research Laboratory, Aerospace Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Front Neuroergon. 2025 Mar 5;6:1472693. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2025.1472693. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to investigate the relationship between the subjective performance evaluations on pilot trainees' aircraft control abilities and their brainwave dynamics reflected in the results from EEG microstate analysis. Specifically, we seek to identify correlations between distinct microstate patterns and each dimension included in the subjective flight control evaluations, shedding light on the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying aviation expertise and possible directions for future improvements in pilot training.
Proficiency in aircraft control is crucial for aviation safety and modern aviation where pilots need to maneuver aircraft through an array of situations, ranging from routine takeoffs and landings to complex weather conditions and emergencies. However, the neurophysiological aspects of aviation expertise remain largely unexplored. This research bridges the gap by examining the relationship between pilot trainees' specific brainwave patterns and their subjective evaluations of flight control levels, offering insights into the cognitive underpinnings of pilot skill efficiency and development.
EEG microstate analysis was employed to examine the brainwave dynamics of pilot trainees while they performed aircraft control tasks under a flight simulator-based pilot training process. Trainees' control performance was evaluated by experienced instructors across five dimensions and their EEG data were analyzed to investigate the associations between the parameters of specific microstates with successful aircraft control.
The experimental results revealed significant associations between aircraft control levels and the parameters of distinct EEG microstates. Notably, these associations varied across control dimensions, highlighting the multifaceted nature of control proficiency. Noteworthy correlations included positive correlations between microstate class E and class G with aircraft control, emphasizing the role of attentional processes, perceptual integration, working memory, cognitive flexibility, decision-making, and executive control in aviation expertise. Conversely, negative correlations between microstate class C and class F with aircraft control indicated links between pilot trainees' cognitive control and their control performance on flight tasks.
The findings underscore the multidimensional nature of aircraft control proficiency and emphasize the significance of attentional and cognitive processes in achieving aviation expertise. These neurophysiological markers offer a basis for designing targeted pilot training programs and interventions to enhance trainees' aircraft control skills.
本研究旨在探讨对飞行学员飞机操控能力的主观绩效评估与脑电图微状态分析结果所反映的脑波动力学之间的关系。具体而言,我们试图确定不同微状态模式与主观飞行操控评估中所包含的各个维度之间的相关性,以揭示航空专业技能背后的神经生理机制以及未来飞行员培训改进的可能方向。
飞机操控能力对于航空安全至关重要,在现代航空中,飞行员需要在一系列情况下操纵飞机,从常规起飞和降落到复杂天气条件及紧急情况。然而,航空专业技能的神经生理方面在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究通过考察飞行学员特定脑波模式与其飞行操控水平主观评估之间的关系,填补了这一空白,为飞行员技能效率和发展的认知基础提供了见解。
在基于飞行模拟器的飞行员培训过程中,当飞行学员执行飞机操控任务时,采用脑电图微状态分析来检查其脑波动力学。经验丰富的教员从五个维度评估学员的操控表现,并对其脑电图数据进行分析,以研究特定微状态参数与成功飞机操控之间的关联。
实验结果揭示了飞机操控水平与不同脑电图微状态参数之间存在显著关联。值得注意的是,这些关联在不同操控维度上有所不同,凸显了操控能力的多面性。值得注意的相关性包括微状态E类和G类与飞机操控之间的正相关,强调了注意力过程、感知整合、工作记忆、认知灵活性、决策和执行控制在航空专业技能中的作用。相反,微状态C类和F类与飞机操控之间的负相关表明飞行学员的认知控制与其飞行任务操控表现之间存在联系。
研究结果强调了飞机操控能力的多维性质,并强调了注意力和认知过程在获得航空专业技能中的重要性。这些神经生理标志物为设计有针对性的飞行员培训计划和干预措施以提高学员的飞机操控技能提供了基础。