• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代建制度下房地产企业与城市投资建设公司竞合关系的演变

Evolution of coopetition between real estate enterprises and urban investment construction companies under an agent construction system.

作者信息

Li Shaoliang, Zheng Xiazhong, Yan Kesheng, Xue Xinxin

机构信息

Hubei Key Laboratory of Hydropower Engineering Construction and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.

College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, 443002, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92853-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-92853-5
PMID:40113822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11926094/
Abstract

In recent years, the agent construction system has introduced novel mechanisms for coopetition between Urban Investment and Construction Companies (UICCs) and Real Estate Enterprises (REEs) in China's real estate market. However, the dynamic evolutionary patterns of such interactions remain poorly understood. Under concurrent competition and cooperation, the interplay between UICCs and REEs has grown increasingly complex, involving multidimensional shifts in information transmission and mutual influence, which traditional methodologies struggle to comprehensively capture and analyze. This study constructs a dual-layer heterogeneous network model, integrating prospect theory (PT) and mental accounting (MA) with coopetition game theory, to rigorously analyze multilevel interdependencies between UICCs and REEs. The objective is to uncover evolutionary dynamics of coopetition under the agent construction system and accurately reflect multidimensional interactive behaviors among enterprises. Key findings include: (1) Synergistic enhancements in network connectivity and initial cooperation willingness significantly promote the deep diffusion of cooperative behaviors. However, REEs exhibit greater sensitivity to fluctuations in cooperation willingness compared to UICCs; (2) A nonlinear relationship between agency fees and project premium rates reveals REEs' "preference for independent development" under brand advantages, whereas UICCs demonstrate strong reliance on balanced equity allocation. These conclusions offer managerial implications for governments to refine agent construction policies and for enterprises to formulate dynamic coopetition strategies.

摘要

近年来,代建制度在中国房地产市场引入了城市投资建设公司(UICCs)与房地产企业(REEs)之间的新型竞合机制。然而,这种互动的动态演化模式仍知之甚少。在竞争与合作并存的情况下,UICCs与REEs之间的相互作用日益复杂,涉及信息传递和相互影响的多维转变,传统方法难以全面捕捉和分析。本研究构建了一个双层异质网络模型,将前景理论(PT)和心理账户(MA)与竞合博弈理论相结合,以严格分析UICCs与REEs之间的多层次相互依存关系。目的是揭示代建制度下竞合的演化动态,并准确反映企业间的多维互动行为。主要研究结果包括:(1)网络连通性和初始合作意愿的协同增强显著促进了合作行为的深度扩散。然而,与UICCs相比,REEs对合作意愿的波动表现出更高的敏感性;(2)代理费与项目溢价率之间的非线性关系揭示了REEs在品牌优势下的“自主开发偏好”,而UICCs则表现出对平衡股权分配的强烈依赖。这些结论为政府完善代建政策和企业制定动态竞合策略提供了管理启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/6d4b131b57cd/41598_2025_92853_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/62e9a60eb965/41598_2025_92853_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/0799808b4de8/41598_2025_92853_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/0b72962c31d6/41598_2025_92853_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/fa52d94cd15d/41598_2025_92853_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/072368f0cb11/41598_2025_92853_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/fc92118693d7/41598_2025_92853_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/6d4b131b57cd/41598_2025_92853_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/62e9a60eb965/41598_2025_92853_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/0799808b4de8/41598_2025_92853_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/0b72962c31d6/41598_2025_92853_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/fa52d94cd15d/41598_2025_92853_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/072368f0cb11/41598_2025_92853_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/fc92118693d7/41598_2025_92853_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7640/11926094/6d4b131b57cd/41598_2025_92853_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of coopetition between real estate enterprises and urban investment construction companies under an agent construction system.代建制度下房地产企业与城市投资建设公司竞合关系的演变
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92853-5.
2
How supply chain enterprises achieve coordination between green transition and profitability under the carbon trading framework.供应链企业如何在碳交易框架下实现绿色转型与盈利能力之间的协调。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Mar;377:124588. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124588. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Horizontal Tourism Coopetition Strategy for Marketing Performance - Evidence From Theme Parks.基于主题公园证据的营销绩效横向旅游合作竞争策略
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 19;13:917435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917435. eCollection 2022.
4
Dynamic coopetition game between private label and national brand under carbon trading policy.碳交易政策下自有品牌与全国性品牌之间的动态合作竞争博弈
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 8;9(3):e14348. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14348. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Hyper-competition, collusion, free riding or coopetition: basins of attraction when firms simultaneously compete and cooperate.超竞争、合谋、搭便车或合作竞争:企业同时竞争与合作时的吸引域
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2013 Jan;17(1):133-57.
6
A study on the promotion effect of government guidance on the construction of a national unified market logistics channel.关于政府引导对全国统一市场物流通道建设的促进作用的研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0293969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293969. eCollection 2023.
7
Evolutionary Game Research on Green Construction Considering Consumers' Preference under Government Supervision.政府监管下考虑消费者偏好的绿色建筑演化博弈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 13;19(24):16743. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416743.
8
Does the green finance policy affect the efficiency of corporate investment? Evidence from China's green finance reform and innovation pilot zones.绿色金融政策是否会影响企业投资效率?来自中国绿色金融改革创新试验区的证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0313861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313861. eCollection 2024.
9
Evolutionary game model of construction enterprises and construction material manufacturers in the construction and demolition waste resource utilization.建筑企业与建材制造商在建筑和拆除废物资源利用中的演化博弈模型。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Feb;41(2):477-495. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221122548. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
10
Coopetition in health care: A multi-level analysis of its individual and organizational determinants.医疗保健领域的合作竞争:个体和组织决定因素的多层次分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;186:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.051. Epub 2017 May 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Steady-state analysis of social responsibility strategy of coal power enterprises from the perspective of game theory.基于博弈论视角的煤电企业社会责任战略稳态分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 2;10(1):e23124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23124. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
An evolutionary game analysis of supervision behavior in public-private partnership projects: Insights from prospect theory and mental accounting.公私合营项目中监管行为的演化博弈分析:来自前景理论和心理账户的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1023945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023945. eCollection 2022.
3
Moderating Role of Information Asymmetry Between Cognitive Biases and Investment Decisions: A Mediating Effect of Risk Perception.
认知偏差与投资决策之间信息不对称的调节作用:风险感知的中介效应
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 22;13:828956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828956. eCollection 2022.
4
An evolutionary inspection game with labour unions on small-world networks.小世界网络上与工会相关的进化检查博弈
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 6;5:8881. doi: 10.1038/srep08881.
5
Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.“小世界”网络的集体动力学
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2. doi: 10.1038/30918.
6
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.决策的框架与选择的心理学。
Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.