• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型肿瘤药物同情用药计划分析

An analysis of compassionate access programmes for novel oncology drugs.

作者信息

Kelly Sarah A, Ronan Karine E, Zameer Mohammed, Brown Jennifer, Johnston Grainne, Adams Ruth, Murphy Dearbhla, Kelly Deirdre, Darwish Waseem, McCaffery John, Coyne Geraldine O'Sullivan, Harrold Emily, Iqbal Shahid, Cowzer Darren, Duffy Austin G

机构信息

School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun;194(3):807-815. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03930-7. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-03930-7
PMID:40117035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12276104/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the rise in the number of approved novel oncology drugs, just over half of all new cancer medicines approved by the EMA between 2017 and 2021 were granted reimbursement in Ireland by the HSE. Compassionate access programmes (CAPs) are a means of providing managed access to drugs which are of proven benefit but have not yet received full approval for reimbursement by the state, or where the requested indication has not been yet been authorised/licensed.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients attending The Mater hospital for treatment of advanced malignancy who availed of a CAP between August 2012 and July 2022. Clinical data collected included disease type, treatment received, duration of treatment received, and best response to treatment. To categorize outcome "Clinical Benefit" was defined as a radiological complete, partial, or stable disease response to treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirteen patients were included in the study. Ninety-three received at least one dose of CAP treatment. Treatment duration ranged from 0 to 112 months, with 12 patients on treatment for ≥ 2 years. N = 47 (42%) experienced a Clinical Benefit. Of these, N = 7 experienced a complete response [CR]. Thirty patients (27%) did not receive a planned treatment or died within 3 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review of a decade of CAPs at our institution we observed that a significant proportion of patients derived a clinical benefit from CAP treatment. Unfortunately, however, a significant proportion of patients did not receive a planned treatment due to disease progression or died within 3 months of treatment suggesting availability came too late. While CAPs can provide meaningful benefit, they are not a substitute for timely approval of novel agents.

摘要

背景

尽管获批的新型肿瘤药物数量有所增加,但2017年至2021年间欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的所有新型癌症药物中,只有略超过一半在爱尔兰获得了卫生服务局(HSE)的报销。同情用药计划(CAPs)是一种提供对已证明有益但尚未获得国家全额报销批准的药物进行管理性获取的方式,或者是针对尚未获得授权/许可的所请求适应症的药物。

方法

对2012年8月至2022年7月期间在圣母医院接受晚期恶性肿瘤治疗并使用了同情用药计划的患者进行回顾性研究。收集的临床数据包括疾病类型、接受的治疗、接受治疗的持续时间以及对治疗的最佳反应。为了对结果进行分类,“临床获益”被定义为对治疗的放射学完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定反应。

结果

113名患者纳入研究。93名患者接受了至少一剂同情用药计划治疗。治疗持续时间从0到112个月不等,12名患者治疗时间≥2年。N = 47(42%)患者有临床获益。其中,N = 7名患者有完全缓解[CR]。30名患者(27%)未接受计划治疗或在治疗3个月内死亡。

结论

在对我们机构十年的同情用药计划的回顾中,我们观察到相当一部分患者从同情用药计划治疗中获得了临床获益。然而,不幸的是,相当一部分患者由于疾病进展未接受计划治疗或在治疗3个月内死亡,这表明药物可及性来得太晚。虽然同情用药计划可以提供有意义的益处,但它们不能替代新型药物的及时批准。

相似文献

1
An analysis of compassionate access programmes for novel oncology drugs.新型肿瘤药物同情用药计划分析
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun;194(3):807-815. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03930-7. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
An Open Access Database of Licensed Cancer Drugs.一个获得许可的癌症药物开放获取数据库。
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 11;12:627574. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.627574. eCollection 2021.
2
Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, -Mutated Advanced NSCLC.奥希替尼治疗未经治、-突变型晚期 NSCLC 的总生存期。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):41-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913662. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.
全球癌症生存趋势监测 2000-14 年(CONCORD-3):对来自 71 个国家 322 个基于人群的登记处的 37513025 名诊断患有 18 种癌症之一的患者的个体记录进行分析。
Lancet. 2018 Mar 17;391(10125):1023-1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
4
Managed Entry Agreements for Oncology Drugs: Lessons from the European Experience to Inform the Future.肿瘤药物的准入管理协议:欧洲经验对未来的启示
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Apr 4;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00171. eCollection 2017.
5
Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).1995 - 2009年全球癌症生存情况监测:对来自67个国家279个基于人群的登记处的25,676,887例患者的个体数据进行分析(CONCORD - 2)
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):977-1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9. Epub 2014 Nov 26.