Tilley A J
Sleep. 1985;8(2):129-36. doi: 10.1093/sleep/8.2.129.
The sleep of 8 women was restricted to the first half of the night for 1 night on two separate occasions. On each occasion, heavy loss of REM (64%) and stage 2 (60%) with only a relatively light loss (20%) of slow wave sleep resulted. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether or not the circadian timing of recovery sleep, particularly the second 4 h, would affect the response of the sleep system to the differential loss of the sleep stages. Recovery sleep commenced at 2000 h (i.e., after a normal daily span of 16 h of wakefulness) and was either continuous or interrupted after 4 h with 4 h of enforced wakefulness. Thus, the second 4 h of recovery sleep occurred between either 0000-0400 h or 0400-0800 h, two periods of the night normally associated with low and high levels of REM, respectively. The composition of recovery sleep, particularly the level of REM sleep, was found to be relatively unaffected by circadian factors. Instead, the response of the sleep system was mainly determined by stage 4 debt. It was suggested that obtaining a daily stage 4 quota acts as the primary drive mechanism of the sleep system.