Savini Federico
Department of Geography, Planning and International Development Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Plan Theory. 2025 May;24(2):141-162. doi: 10.1177/14730952241258693. Epub 2024 May 31.
Degrowth is gaining traction as a viable alternative to mainstream approaches to sustainability. However, translating degrowth insights into concrete strategies of collective action remains a challenge. To address this challenge, this paper develops a degrowth perspective for strategic spatial planning as well as a strategic approach for degrowth. I argue that a degrowth transition needs to address three strategic issues: depth, agency, and trajectory. Degrowth strategies aim for satiation, the satisfaction of all essential needs in a particular society. To do so, they rely on diffused societal power, raising from existing practices of reduction. Strategies also follow a nonlinear trajectory that seeks to prefigure satiation, popularize it among the masses, and then pressure existing institutions. Strategic spatial planning offers important insights for dealing with these challenges but needs to embrace satiation as a strategic goal. It can do so by creating complementarities between prefigurative practices that perform satiation. The article defines and illustrates these processes by looking at the making of Amsterdam's 'doughnut' strategy.
去增长作为可持续发展主流方法的一种可行替代方案正越来越受到关注。然而,将去增长的见解转化为集体行动的具体策略仍然是一项挑战。为应对这一挑战,本文为战略空间规划提出了一种去增长视角,并提出了一种去增长的战略方法。我认为,去增长转型需要解决三个战略问题:深度、能动性和轨迹。去增长战略旨在实现满足,即满足特定社会中所有基本需求。为此,它们依赖于分散的社会力量,这种力量源于现有的减少实践。这些战略还遵循一条非线性轨迹,旨在预先塑造满足、在大众中普及满足,然后向现有机构施压。战略空间规划为应对这些挑战提供了重要见解,但需要将满足作为一个战略目标。它可以通过在执行满足的预塑实践之间创造互补性来做到这一点。本文通过审视阿姆斯特丹“甜甜圈”战略的制定过程来定义和阐释这些过程。