Suppr超能文献

四个电子健康记录数据库中161家美国医院按种族和性别划分的动脉血气检测差异。

Differences in Arterial Blood Gas Testing by Race and Sex across 161 U.S. Hospitals in Four Electronic Health Record Databases.

作者信息

Matos João, Alwakeel Mahmoud, Hao Sicheng, Naamani Dana, Struja Tristan, Gichoya Judy Wawira, Celi Leo Anthony, McMahon Timothy, King Heather A, Cox Christopher E, Kibbe Warren A, Hong Chuan, Wong An-Kwok Ian

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine.

Respiratory Institute, Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;211(6):1049-1058. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202406-1242OC.

Abstract

Pulse oximetry accuracy varies across races, underscoring the importance of routine arterial blood gas (ABG) testing, the gold standard for assessing oxygen saturation. This study aimed to assess disparities in ABG testing among critically ill patients by race and sex. Records from 2001 to 2019 in 161 U.S. hospitals were analyzed, including Duke, MIMIC-III (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care), MIMIC-IV, and the eICU Collaborative Research Database. The study evaluated ABG test incidence; time to first test; and frequency of subsequent tests, adjusting for confounders, including the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, hospital, and age. Subgroup analyses focused on patients with arterial lines and mechanical ventilation. The cohort included 184,178 ICU admissions (35.0% with ABG test results; 1.9% Asian, 16.5% Black, 3.5% Hispanic or Latino, 78.1% White, 45.7% female). Compared with White patients, Asian, Black, and Hispanic or Latino patients were less likely to have an ABG test (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)], 0.807 [0.741, 0.879]; 0.859 [0.830, 0.888]; 0.919 [0.865, 0.976], respectively), experienced delays to initial ABG testing (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI], Asian, 0.855 [0.803, 0.911]; Black, 0.833 [0.814, 0.853];  < 0.001), and were less likely to have repeated ABG tests (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], Asian 0.913 [0.845, 0.986]; Black 0.913 [0.887, 0.940]). Compared with male patients, female patients underwent fewer ABG tests (OR [95% CI], 0.926 [0.905, 0.948]), had delays in initial testing (HR [95% CI], 0.958 [0.942, 0.974]), and had fewer repeated ABG tests (incidence rate ratio [95% CI], 0.951 (0.931, 0.971)). These findings were consistent among patients who were mechanically ventilated and had arterial lines placed. Asian, Black, and female patients had significantly reduced and delayed rates of ABG testing. Inequitable ABG testing may exacerbate the prevalence of hidden hypoxemia. Until skin tone-corrected pulse oximeters are available, equitable ABG testing remains the best strategy to mitigate hidden hypoxemia.

摘要

脉搏血氧饱和度测定的准确性因种族而异,这凸显了常规动脉血气(ABG)检测的重要性,ABG检测是评估血氧饱和度的金标准。本研究旨在评估危重症患者中按种族和性别划分的ABG检测差异。分析了美国161家医院2001年至2019年的记录,包括杜克大学、MIMIC - III(重症监护医学信息集市)、MIMIC - IV和电子重症监护病房协作研究数据库。该研究评估了ABG检测发生率;首次检测时间;以及后续检测频率,并对包括序贯器官衰竭评估、医院和年龄等混杂因素进行了调整。亚组分析聚焦于有动脉置管和机械通气的患者。该队列包括184178例重症监护病房入院患者(35.0%有ABG检测结果;1.9%为亚洲人,16.5%为黑人,3.5%为西班牙裔或拉丁裔,78.1%为白人,45.7%为女性)。与白人患者相比,亚洲、黑人和西班牙裔或拉丁裔患者进行ABG检测的可能性较小(比值比[OR][95%置信区间(CI)]分别为0.807[0.741, 0.879];0.859[0.830, 0.888];0.919[0.865, 0.976]),初始ABG检测有延迟(风险比[HR][95%CI],亚洲人为0.855[0.803, 0.911];黑人为0.833[0.814, 0.853];<0.001),且重复进行ABG检测的可能性较小(发病率比[95%CI],亚洲人为0.913[0.845, 0.986];黑人为0.913[0.887, 0.940])。与男性患者相比,女性患者进行的ABG检测较少(OR[95%CI],0.926[0.905, 0.948]),初始检测有延迟(HR[95%CI],0.958[0.942, 0.974]),且重复ABG检测较少(发病率比[95%CI],0.951(0.931, 0.971))。这些发现在接受机械通气和有动脉置管的患者中是一致的。亚洲、黑人和女性患者的ABG检测率显著降低且有延迟。不公平的ABG检测可能会加剧隐匿性低氧血症的患病率。在肤色校正的脉搏血氧仪可用之前,公平的ABG检测仍然是减轻隐匿性低氧血症的最佳策略。

相似文献

4
Racial Inequities and Access to COVID-19 Treatment.种族不平等与获得新冠病毒治疗的机会
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2518459. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.18459.

本文引用的文献

2
BOLD: Blood-gas and Oximetry Linked Dataset.BOLD:血气和血氧饱和度关联数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 May 24;11(1):535. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03225-z.
4
Participant flow diagrams for health equity in AI.人工智能健康公平性的参与者流程图。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Apr;152:104631. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104631. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Disparities among patients with respiratory failure.呼吸衰竭患者的差异。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Oct 1;29(5):493-504. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001079. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验