• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在Instagram上应对猴痘错误信息的纠正方法和标签框架

Correction approaches and hashtag framing in addressing Mpox misinformation on Instagram.

作者信息

Ku Kelly Y L, Li Jiarui, Luo Yueming, Song Yunya

机构信息

Department of Education and Psychology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.

School of Journalism and Communication, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2025 Mar 24;40(2). doi: 10.1093/her/cyaf009.

DOI:10.1093/her/cyaf009
PMID:40126976
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11932142/
Abstract

The rapid spread of health misinformation on social media poses significant challenges to public health crisis. Mpox misinformation has portrayed it as exclusively a sexually transmitted infection, resulting in misperceptions about infection risk and stigmatization of affected groups. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different correction approaches and message framing in reducing misperception and shaping disease-related attitudes, both immediately after exposure and after a 1-day delay. We employed a 2 × 2 design with a control group to test correction approaches (fact-based vs. logic-based) combined with hashtag framing (health literacy vs. inclusivity) through an experiment (N = 274). Findings showed that all corrections reduced misperception both immediately and after 1 day and increased the likelihood of sharing corrective messages. Only corrections with inclusivity hashtags promoted more positive attitudes towards Mpox immediately after exposure. Stereotypes played a significant moderating role where participants with stronger stereotypes showed a greater reduction in misperception when exposed to corrections with inclusivity hashtags but were less likely to share logic-based corrective message. These findings contributed to understanding effective health communication by highlighting the role of social media hashtags in message framing, promoting user sharing of corrective information, and addressing stereotypes when designing interventions against health misinformation.

摘要

健康错误信息在社交媒体上的迅速传播给公共卫生危机带来了重大挑战。猴痘错误信息将其描述为一种仅通过性传播的感染,导致对感染风险的误解以及对受影响群体的污名化。本研究旨在评估不同纠正方法和信息框架在接触后立即以及延迟1天后减少误解和塑造与疾病相关态度方面的有效性。我们采用2×2设计并设置一个对照组,通过一项实验(N = 274)来测试纠正方法(基于事实与基于逻辑)与主题标签框架(健康素养与包容性)的组合。研究结果表明,所有纠正措施在接触后立即和1天后都减少了误解,并增加了分享纠正信息的可能性。只有带有包容性主题标签的纠正措施在接触后立即促进了对猴痘更积极的态度。刻板印象起到了显著的调节作用,即具有较强刻板印象的参与者在接触带有包容性主题标签的纠正信息时,误解减少得更多,但分享基于逻辑的纠正信息的可能性较小。这些发现通过强调社交媒体主题标签在信息框架中的作用、促进用户分享纠正信息以及在设计针对健康错误信息的干预措施时应对刻板印象,有助于理解有效的健康传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aee/11932142/a8cb4431b29b/cyaf009f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aee/11932142/a8cb4431b29b/cyaf009f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aee/11932142/a8cb4431b29b/cyaf009f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Correction approaches and hashtag framing in addressing Mpox misinformation on Instagram.在Instagram上应对猴痘错误信息的纠正方法和标签框架
Health Educ Res. 2025 Mar 24;40(2). doi: 10.1093/her/cyaf009.
2
Credibility of misinformation source moderates the effectiveness of corrective messages on social media.错误信息来源的可信度会影响社交媒体上纠正信息的有效性。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jul;33(5):587-603. doi: 10.1177/09636625231215979. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
3
Gaming with health misinformation: a social capital-based study of corrective information sharing factors in social media.传播健康错误信息的游戏行为:基于社会资本对社交媒体中纠正信息分享因素的研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1351820. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1351820. eCollection 2024.
4
A qualitative review of social media sharing and the 2022 monkeypox outbreak: did early labelling help to curb misinformation or fuel the fire?社交媒体分享与 2022 年猴痘疫情的定性回顾:早期标签是否有助于遏制错误信息传播还是火上浇油?
Sex Health. 2024 Feb;21. doi: 10.1071/SH23158.
5
Media Literacy and Its Potential Influence on Mpox-Related Perceptions and Prevention Intentions in China During the 2022 Multi-Country Outbreak of Mpox.2022年多国猴痘疫情期间,媒介素养及其对中国猴痘相关认知和预防意愿的潜在影响
Health Commun. 2025 Jun;40(7):1341-1351. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2400391. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
6
Collective Value Promotes the Willingness to Share Provaccination Messages on Social Media in China: Randomized Controlled Trial.集体价值观促进中国社交媒体上分享疫苗接种信息的意愿:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 4;6(10):e35744. doi: 10.2196/35744.
7
Predicting User Engagement in Health Misinformation Correction on Social Media Platforms in Taiwan: Content Analysis and Text Mining Study.预测台湾社交媒体平台上健康错误信息纠正中的用户参与度:内容分析与文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e65631. doi: 10.2196/65631.
8
Countering Antivax Misinformation via Social Media: Message-Testing Randomized Experiment for Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Uptake.通过社交媒体对抗反疫苗错误信息:人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率的信息测试随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 24;24(11):e37559. doi: 10.2196/37559.
9
Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention.减轻社交媒体中信息特征对健康错误信息分享意愿的影响:准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117136. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117136. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
10
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.错误信息与美国埃博拉疫情传播危机:分析与引发恐慌的传染病爆发相关的社交媒体信息的真实性和内容
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.

本文引用的文献

1
WHO Director-General declares mpox outbreak a public health emergency of international concern.世界卫生组织总干事宣布猴痘疫情构成“国际关注的突发公共卫生事件”。
Saudi Med J. 2024 Aug;45(9):1002-1003.
2
Mpox-is there a more dangerous new clade?猴痘——是否存在更危险的新分支?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Nov;24(11):e667. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00564-4. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
3
Mpox: "the stigma is as dangerous as the virus". Historical, social, ethical issues and future forthcoming.猴痘:“污名与病毒一样危险”。历史、社会、伦理问题及未来展望。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 1;64(4):E398-E404. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.3144. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
A qualitative review of social media sharing and the 2022 monkeypox outbreak: did early labelling help to curb misinformation or fuel the fire?社交媒体分享与 2022 年猴痘疫情的定性回顾:早期标签是否有助于遏制错误信息传播还是火上浇油?
Sex Health. 2024 Feb;21. doi: 10.1071/SH23158.
5
Mpox stigma among men who have sex with men in the Netherlands: Underlying beliefs and comparisons across other commonly stigmatized infections.在荷兰,男男性行为者中猴痘的污名:与其他常见受污名化感染的比较和潜在信念。
J Med Virol. 2023 Sep;95(9):e29091. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29091.
6
Is Mpox a Sexually Transmitted Infection? Why Narrowing the Scope of This Disease May Be Harmful.猴痘是不是一种性传播感染?为什么将这种疾病的范围收窄可能会带来危害。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Apr 17;76(8):1504-1507. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac962.
7
What can we learn from HIV, COVID-19 and mpox stigma to guide stigma-informed pandemic preparedness?我们可以从艾滋病毒、新冠病毒和猴痘的污名化现象中学到什么,以指导基于污名认知的大流行防范工作?
J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Dec;25(12):e26042. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26042.
8
The #VaccinesWork Hashtag on Twitter in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Network Analysis.推特上的#疫苗有效#标签在新冠疫情背景下的网络分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 28;8(10):e38153. doi: 10.2196/38153.
9
The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic.错误信息对新冠疫情的影响。
AIMS Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;9(2):262-277. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022018. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparisons Between COVID-19 Stigma and Other Stigmas: Distinct in Explicit Attitudes and Similar in Implicit Process.2019冠状病毒病污名与其他污名的比较:显性态度有别,隐性过程相似
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:848993. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848993. eCollection 2022.